Ok, then we're all on the same calibration here.
Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
Ok, then we're all on the same calibration here.
Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
Anyway, NSA may get hit with a corruption review.
Apparently in 2014-2016 NSA was over collecting data on US persons under rule 702, (https://fas.org/irp/news/2013/06/nsa-sect702.pdf) which was going to lead to a investigation. It was mass data collection and US persons were getting caught up in it. Instead of fixing the issue, Obama and Senate made NSA director an appointed position by the executive branch instead of judicial branch(2016 NSA IG Empowerment Act) and that basically skipped any oversight requirements. How is this relevant today? (I mean, apart from NSA STILL just storing your kindle app/incognito mode or whatever data without oversight)
Relevance?
Adam Schiff's phone record's subpoena, and it's not that he subpoenaed specific numbers from AT&T and Verizon, but the question is how did he obtain that block of numbers? The link to the NSA is just "sources say" and mostly from Fox News, but God help the democrats if evidence comes out it's true.
You just finished your paragraph with a question and an acknowledgement that what you're talking about is 'sources say' and from Fox News.
Why god help the democrats? Where the hell is "God help the 3 letter org" whenever they abuse their power to alienate the rights of colored people? Muslims?
3letter orgs abusing power is nothing new. Quit acting like they only abuse it to hurt Rs instead of them always abusing it to maintain their status quo and complete their investigation, personal freedoms be damned.
Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk
Amen to that, but why dems specifically?
Once again, it's speculation: But if Schiff did use NSA data for that block of numbers, it's reasonable to assume he or somebody else used it before in pursuit of Trump. If you recall the original whistleblower complaint originated from compiled anonymous sources through the NSA office. It would throw kerosene on the deep state fire.
Maybe, but that narrative always seems to exclude abuses of power aimed at keeping minorities down is my point.
Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk
Are you sure about that? The idea that knowledge is power is the driving force behind spycraft, journalism, and marketing.
Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
That's not Foucault, nothing with him is so rudimentary.
edit: Here, found a good quote
‘Truth is a thing of this world: it is produced only by virtue of multiple forms of constraint. And it induces regular effects of power. Each society has its regime of truth, its “general politics” of truth: that is, the types of discourse which it accepts and makes function as true; the mechanisms and instances which enable one to distinguish true and false statements, the means by which each is sanctioned; the techniques and procedures accorded value in the acquisition of truth; the status of those who are charged with saying what counts as true’
Shit man that's basically the plot of Persona 5.
Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
Foucault's conception of power is quite accurate. The thing that everyone forgets is that Foucault admitted that biopower is inevitable and that it can be good in some instances.
It's when you get into theorists who started to try apply biopower to politics and attempt to solve for it that you run into issues.
No more like people like Zizek
Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
Murkowski criticizes McConnell saying the Senate is working with Trump's team on impeachment
Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
Her brow is thoroughly furrowed.
Not much else will happen.
"Senators that historically only vote against their party when their votes aren't needed threaten to vote against their party".
*scoff*