You make me sad. So... so... so sad.
You make me sad. So... so... so sad.
The notion that you're engaging in intelligent conversation.
I'm not attempting to hurt your feelings. I'm disappointed people like you contribute to work I have to dredge through and read while you claim nothing of substance is in an argument because it doesn't have numbers and a p value.
Get out of here with that shit.
Edit:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencet...ed-morals.html
https://theconversation.com/how-bein...ard-sex-110745
Source:
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/...111/ssqu.12544
Great example of both how a study weighs its potential limitations and interpretations as well as how different people interpret it.
It purports that liberal ideas, such as abortion choice or sexuality, are actually associated with perceived attractiveness. This contradicts the idea that attractive means conservative, because conservatives oppose these behaviors.
You haven't claimed anything of substance, even in lieu of data. You haven't made a single point aside from trying to dismantle a peer reviewed study - of which if you are correct I suggest you contact the CA and ask their opinion, but being outside my area of expertise I'm reluctant to agree with yours.
Here I'll make it easy, beauty leads to wealth which leads to conservatism. Where do you disagree?
Literally what the fuck, lmao
Kuro... i told you like two pages ago this is what would happen. He is just shitting all over the chessboard and you keep trying to play with him. He has shown his inability to read and understand, multiple times. Go have a drink man, here is to a new year.
I'm in love with the enkidu logic " I'm not an expert in the field and thus neither ever wrong and unable to admit when someone else is possibly right"
Imma use "being outside my area of expertise I'm reluctant to agree with yours."
But seriously, this is a stupid fucking conversation lol. And I'm not reluctant to say that because stupid fucking conversations are my expertise.
I know right? Its like staring into a mirror and laughing at your own reflection!
JK Guys its just a prank don't wake up.
Didn't read the news articles, but the paper is interesting. However, the authors discuss the seeming contradiction:
It also cites a study on attractiveness and egalitarianism (https://www.sciencedirect.com/scienc...91886910005933) that found a negative correlation. So while it adds nuance to the discussion that probably doesn't need to continue, the authors of that article are pretty much in alignment with the authors of the previous article I posted.Originally Posted by Authors
You're missing my point, but thank you for reading it.
"Great example of both how a study weighs its potential limitations and interpretations as well as how different people interpret it."
Wars need ridill more than thfs do!
"thief being outside my area of expertise I'm reluctant to agree with yours."
Bro my paladin was a threat monster with a Ridill. I miss being a kid and having an unreasonable amount of time to devote to the final fantasies.
As far as if someone could use it more than my paladin, no cares, I hunted it with a red mage friend and we got his first and then mine.
To be fair, optimal gear setup was way outside of my area of expertise and I just wanted the shiny sword with extra swings.
literally everyone could use it more than a paladin
(you mean joyeuse)
fuck why did i post who cares god damn it