Predisent Donald J. Skroob: Episode X: Purple Raining to Impeachment

[Tyrath]

Lefty sites say they brought cell phones, righty sites say cell phones were collected. How the hell are you guys convinced you know who is telling the truth?

You dumb motherfucker he tweeted from in there.

The picture above notwithstanding.

[Kalmado]

Watching people like Guartz is hilarious. He's the type where he just can't be wrong about anything. He'd argue the sky is purple. God would come down and tell Guartz no, the sky is blue and Guartz would tell the creator of all they are wrong. And then probably call God a libtard.

[kuronosan]

Guartz is either trolling or 100% convinced he's right, and I'm not surprised.

Many places in Russia frown on critical thinking and are all about obeying the state.

[Tyche]

My only disappointment with Guartz is that he disappears when someone shuts his nonsense down, then reappears when convenient. Or maybe his 200k a year salary just has him taking very coincidental and opportune hiatuses.

[Dimmauk]

But Guartz told me Republicans weren't in the hearings

I'm sure now that he knows that the details underpinning his arguments are false he'll change his mind!

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

oh it's like a Benghazi hearing? they had like 5 / 4 dem/repub sit on them or something. Man by the way these guys are complaining you'd figure they are not letting any republicans in. Shit I didn't know Republicans were sitting in on those hearings. Thanks for educating me.

Not sure he was serious about getting educated.

[TsingTao]

White House prepping for election by making sure it's as easy as possible to get hacked.

https://arstechnica.com/information-...romised-again/

"And reflecting on the previous vulnerabilities in White House IT operations, he noted, "given all the changes I've seen in the last three months, I foresee the White House is posturing itself to be electronically compromised once again.""

[guartz]

huh, all this hate because I'm pointing out your own bias.

SO I read the testimony and it's SHOCKING the dems actually found somebody to say there was quid quo pro. Sad there was no actual evidence, it's just a word of a respected individual vs the word of what, 3? other people who said there was no quid quo pro. But those guys are corrupt right guys? They are obviously guilty too, otherwise they'd hate trump too.

What is there even to discuss?


oh right, DoJ Durham/Barr investigation has leveled up into criminal investigation. Non-existing deep state alt right conspiracy theory has even poisoned our DOJ! Clearly Barr is racist KKK white supremacist. I'm trying to fit in here, am I doing it right? lol


Flyn's lawyers are probably gonna get Flyn exonerated (read TOTAL EXONERATION, COMPLETELY INNOCENT)



I'm half expecting Trump to start dabbing in his speeches.

[Eurell]

Sad there was no actual evidence

Do those times his admin admitted it was quid pro quo not count?

[Salodin]

What is there to discuss?

How about everything Taylor said being corroborated by the fact that we read the call between presidents, the ukranian aid was held up improperly by OMB, Mulvaney going on TV and admitting they do quid pro quo all the time, the president going on TV to ask china to investigate THE BIDENS (not corruption).

I guess if you turn your brain off and only look at these things individually, maybe you can miss it. But if you actually look at all the actions around this, it's pretty clearly grounds for impeachment in the house.

Now for Durham, good fucking luck. Every week its "the IG report is gonna be released today!", as if you're sure it's going to be bad for Democrats, even though this Republican IG wont release it /eyeroll. Yet each and everytime it gets magically delayed, until finally Italys PM comes out and says Barr tried to get them to look into the start of the russia investigation, and that they had nothing to offer. Why is the US AG flying to Italy to try and fish for a reason for this investigation? How fucking embarrassing is it that Barr goes on a fishing expedition and the fucking fish are telling him hes stupid and the evidence doesnt exist.

And now this magically nonexistent investigation is turning into a criminal probe? Okay, good luck. The Clinton Email probe ended last week? and no criminal things were found to be done, even if improper things were done.

Idk why I responded to this guy...I'm dumb

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk

[chazzyphizzle]

im still not convinced guartz isnt doing a bit

[Tokitoki]

It's possible, but his talking points aren't uncommon for repubs.

[Zealot]

huh, all this hate because I'm pointing out your own bias.

SO I read the testimony and it's SHOCKING the dems actually found somebody to say there was quid quo pro. Sad there was no actual evidence, it's just a word of a respected individual vs the word of what, 3? other people who said there was no quid quo pro. But those guys are corrupt right guys? They are obviously guilty too, otherwise they'd hate trump too.

What is there even to discuss?


oh right, DoJ Durham/Barr investigation has leveled up into criminal investigation. Non-existing deep state alt right conspiracy theory has even poisoned our DOJ! Clearly Barr is racist KKK white supremacist. I'm trying to fit in here, am I doing it right? lol


Flyn's lawyers are probably gonna get Flyn exonerated (read TOTAL EXONERATION, COMPLETELY INNOCENT)



I'm half expecting Trump to start dabbing in his speeches.

I am shocked, SHOCKED I tell you, that three people who stand to suffer if there was quid pro quo would say there wasn't, except for those times they did but we're not talking about that.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

[Tyche]

I am shocked, SHOCKED I tell you, that three people who stand to suffer if there was quid pro quo would say there wasn't, except for those times they did but we're not talking about that.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

I am shocked that Guartz gets dunked on, escapes the thread, then comes back to claim Michael Flynn is going to get totally exonerated, despite this being his attorney's third time trying this same defense, making the same claims, being debunked the previous two times. The Durham investigation was always expected to go criminal. You say it's leveled up as if there's new information. There's not. They just need subpeona power. Laughing at people questioning Barr is quite rich though, beings this is the same AG that let off multiple instances of treason during the Bush Administration and the investigation into Iran Contra. There's plenty of reasons and precedent to be concerned about prosecutorial malfeasance in a Barr DOJ.

[Dimmauk]

I can't remember, but what country was Flynn working for? Is it the same country that we helped when we turned our backs on the Kurds?

[Salodin]

Yes, yes it is.

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk

[Tokitoki]

I saw that one of Giuliani's clients from Ukraine that was indicted is blocking some evidence from coming to court due to executive privilege. Not suspect at all.

[Zealot]

https://www.politico.com/news/2019/1...mocrats-000299

Total exoneration! But no you can't see it.

Odds are against DOJ complying, I'd be shocked if they haven't already destroyed everything.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

[Karbuncle]

I am shocked, SHOCKED I tell you, that three people who stand to suffer if there was quid pro quo

I know everyone likes to dump on Guartz but damn. They aren't to be trusted at face value obviously but man denying something certainly doesn't mean they're covering something up. I mean, they probably are, but then again both sides have stakes in this.

[Zealot]

Go fuck yourself.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

[Zealot]

But in a thoughtful way.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk