Predisent Donald J. Skroob: Episode X: Purple Raining to Impeachment

[Salodin]

I used to be a little bitch, but then I took BG to the knee

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk

[Andalusian girls]

now youse a big ol bitch

[Tokitoki]

I used to be a little bitch, but then I took BG to the knee

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk

True, if BG.

[Tokitoki]

now youse a big ol bitch

Also true.

[Salodin]

now youse a big ol bitch

Big, if true

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk

[Koyangi]

True, Big if

[guartz]

Salodin immediately responded and Zealot followed up with a sarcastic take, but you didn't show up for a few days so I wouldn't expect you to know.

Also, get your Q conspiracy theory shit out of here.

It's a fact that at the time of the call Ukraine didn't know aid was frozen. You guys are straight up lying.

There was testimony that Ukraine learned about it the following month, but Ukraine had no reason to believe it was connected to Trump's request for investigation.

https://time.com/5686788/ukraine-no-...ion-aid-biden/

"Zelensky and his advisers believed that the White House may have frozen the aid package to Ukraine because of the proposed sale of Motor Sich, a Ukrainian factory that produces engines for missiles and jets, to a Chinese company. The U.S. has objected to that sale on national security grounds, and Trump’s then-National Security Adviser John Bolton urged Zelensky and his government to stop the sale during a visit to Kiev in August. “At the time China was more acute,” as an issue in U.S.-Ukrainian relations, than was the question of investigating Biden, says the official."

[guartz]

You guys got any more muddled truth to "dunk" on me?

[kuronosan]

I could come truth all over your face and you'd still believe water is dry.

[Tyche]

Muddled? You said Ukraine didn't know about the aid being frozen. Now, you're moving the window to "Ukraine didn't know at the time of the call..". They knew about a week later. Trump pushed for investigations in the call, which a week later Ukraine finds out that those investigations are tied to aid, which the administration had lied about repeatedly. You denying those facts? Ukraine was well aware of the conditions of the aid being released, which was a public announcement into investigations of his political rivals. That's per testimony of Trump appointed officials. You saying it's a fact that Ukraine didn't know is patently false.

[Dimmauk]

You guys got any more muddled truth to "dunk" on me?

Bro, you are the Shawn Bradley of BG.

[guartz]

Muddled? ... investigations in the call, which a week later Ukraine finds out that those investigations are tied to aid,

"Zelensky and his advisers believed that the White House may have frozen the aid package to Ukraine because of the proposed sale of Motor Sich, a Ukrainian factory that produces engines for missiles and jets, to a Chinese company. The U.S. has objected to that sale on national security grounds, and Trump’s then-National Security Adviser John Bolton urged Zelensky and his government to stop the sale during a visit to Kiev in August. “At the time China was more acute,” as an issue in U.S.-Ukrainian relations, than was the question of investigating Biden, says the official."

don't ignore inconvenient facts Tyche

[guartz]

and you straight up lying again: I said: "Fact: Ukrainians did not know at the time of the call that their funding was on hold. " it's for everyone to read to go back a few pages and read.

[Salodin]

Ukraine knew by the first week of August.

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/23/u...peachment.html

Shut the fuck up, please. This is so dumb. 10 seconds of google would clear this up God damnit

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk

[Tyche]

Quid pro quo only important if it happens in July.

[guartz]

Ukraine knew by the first week of August.

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/23/u...peachment.html

Shut the fuck up, please. This is so dumb. 10 seconds of google would clear this up God damnit

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk

"according to interviews and documents obtained by The New York Times." vs official statements from both governments.

'kay,

but even if it is true, and that's a huge IF, still doesn't change the facts - didn't know at the time of request and there were other issues at play aside from investigating bidens. Stuff like russians gettings technology and Ukraine sellings weapons company to China. But nevermind all that fam, we have a narrative to keep up. Muddled truth.

[Salodin]

Our own ambassadors believed it was a quid pro quo for dirt on the Bidens. And your contention is everyone thought it was a quid pro quo, except the people the quid pro quo was aimed towards?

I learned never to engage you seriously, but the rest of these fools can have at it.

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk

[mallister]

Nah, I'm done.

[guartz]

But speaking of lying and google, compare up search results between google and say like, duckduckgo on "NY times caught lying"

maybe i'm starting to understand why you guys are in such a media bubble.

[guartz]

I learned never to engage you seriously, but the rest of these fools can have at it.

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk

Rich coming from a guy who straight up tried to misrepresent/lie about what I said just a minute ago.