Predisent Donald J. Skroob: Episode X: Purple Raining to Impeachment

[Cail]

Live impeachment hearings today and this is the Trump thread?

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

Yea, I was expecting at least a couple posts talking about today...but nope

[Tyrath]

Live impeachment hearings today and this is the Trump thread?

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

Because it was the same old shit.

What did we learn today that we didn't already know? Nada. How many Republicans stopped shilling for Trump? None.

[guartz]

Live impeachment hearings today and this is the Trump thread?

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

You mean live impeachment hearsay.

[guartz]

I'm actually sorry people were deceived like this. You guys don't deserve it, democrats are obviously only doing this for negative news for Trump and they don't care who they lead by the nose.

[Zealot]

If the statement is offered as testimony that something was said, not that it is true, it's not hearsay.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

[Zealot]

I'm really sorry for you guartz because you're diving to a level where you're just trying to get a rise out of people now and I had thought that you at least had conviction in your beliefs, no matter what anyone else thought of them.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

[guartz]

If the statement is offered as testimony that something was said, not that it is true, it's not hearsay.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

"In keeping with the three evidentiary requirements, the Hearsay Rule, as outlined in the Federal Rules of Evidence, prohibits most statements made outside a courtroom from being used as evidence in court. This is because statements made out of court normally are not made under oath, a judge or jury cannot personally observe the demeanor of someone who makes a statement outside the courtroom, and an opposing party cannot cross-examine such a declarant (the person making the statement). Out-of-court statements hinder the ability of the judge or jury to probe testimony for inaccuracies caused by Ambiguity, insincerity, faulty perception, or erroneous memory. Thus, statements made out of court are perceived as untrustworthy."

[guartz]

[guartz]

and what's worse, democrats did this to you guys before with Mueller.

[Zealot]

That's great that you can read the rules of evidence, might want to check out Rule 803.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

[6souls]

[Zealot]

and what's worse, democrats did this to you guys before with Mueller.

Incorrect.

I feel super bad for you at this point man.

But keep going anyway.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

[guartz]

I get it, you don't like the guy. Pretty clear for anybody looking is that you impeach him or he takes 2020. Power for your team by any means, right?

[Mrbeansman]

I get it, you don't like the guy. Pretty clear for anybody looking is that you impeach him or he takes 2020. Power for your team by any means, right?

lol republicans suppress votes and accept illegal foreign aid but no its the democrats who take power by any means.

[Dimmauk]

Was this in regards to the Ohio state thing? Jim Jordan is great at turning a blind eye.

[Dimmauk]

I get it, you don't like the guy. Pretty clear for anybody looking is that you impeach him or he takes 2020. Power for your team by any means, right?

Trump will still be around to run for president and when he loses, he will blame everyone but himself. It won't matter because he will be gone and you can go back to overreacting to everything a Democrat president does.

[guartz]

2020 might be the only time I actually consider not voting 3rd party.

[Mythe_Seraph]

Trump will still be around to run for president and when he loses, he will blame everyone but himself. It won't matter because he will be gone and you can go back to overreacting to everything a Democrat president does.

Are you talking about 2020? Or 2024?

[Zealot]

No I mean I feel bad because the topic about banning you has come up repeatedly today and I would never be for it except that you just came in and are bringing up the Mueller report again despite it being exhaustively laid out how bad a result the report was for Trump so at this point you're either remaining aggressively ignorant or just seeing what you can say to get a reaction. Either way, changes my opinion greatly.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

[Zealot]

Also you tried to argue hearsay rules with me and only posted the definition of hearsay itself, not any of its 23 exceptions.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk