
Originally Posted by
Mertron
i don’t feel like writing a lot
sci-fi and fantasy are usually linked together as far as genres go and you can generally debate the two in various ways. the main distinguisher is whether the major elements of the narrative are “probable/explainable/definable” or not
generally science fiction is explainable, even if not probable. so yes, while we currently do not have access to spaceships and laser swords in the way they are depicted in the series, they are at least scientifically possible or explainable, which generally defines it as science fiction. even if it doesn’t seem totally plausible (time travel in the time machine, reanimating the dead in frankenstein), if it seems like there is some probable way to define the existence of the major plot elements, it’s usually fine to describe it as sci-fi
fantasy is when the elements are not readily explainable, possibly more along the lines of supernatural (or religious). generally fantasy work will have its own mythos to explain the “unexplainable” elements of the story, because “science” can’t do this. fantasy generally takes place in its own “universe” as well because of this, as scientific properties wouldn’t necessarily be the same there, which is why dragons can breath fire and not die in the process
anyway you could literally define Star Wars as either. it definitely has elements of science fiction, but all of the force bullshit and lore behind it and its universe could drive it to fantasy also. and no, i don’t think quigon or however you spell that explaining the force as “midiclorians” or whatever makes that much of a difference
anyway thank you for coming to my ted talk