{COVID-19} Coronavirus Pandemic III: Second Wave Preperation

[Day]

removed from youtube lol

[Dimmauk]

https://twitter.com/ArtValley818/sta...62716586106880

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oaX8...outu.be&t=1663

thoughts?

My thought is why did you post this? Aren't you in the medical field?

[Zealot]

HC is a vet tech I thought.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

[archibaldcrane]

Oh man wow

[archibaldcrane]

https://twitter.com/BrandyZadrozny/s...532754949?s=19

[archibaldcrane]

Trump is on an absolute rampage on twitter pushing hydroxychloroquine tonight, retweeting literally dozens of tweets touting it.

[Mertron]

https://twitter.com/BrandyZadrozny/s...532754949?s=19

if you want a real treat, start looking up info on that doctor that claims she’s saved over 300 lives with hydrox, you’ll have a laugh

[Deejay]

What does Trump gain by peddling this miracle drug? Does he think can just rig the numbers and pretend people aren’t packing ICU’s?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Mertron]

What does Trump gain by peddling this miracle drug? Does he think can just rig the numbers and pretend people aren’t packing ICU’s?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

people talk about how he has investments that are tied to it, but there’s a simpler answer

he can’t possibly be wrong about anything, ever, and just has to keep doubling down no matter what

[Mayareira]

HCQ appears to be more of a supporting treatment than a cure. There are reports showing that when used correctly it does prevent disease from progressing to the fatal level.

Like kuro said, at this stage I don't think there is a study with enough sample size that can tell you the exact percentage and success chance of HCQ treatment. Several medication is being used in the advanced stages and it may be challenging to single out the success rate of a single med.

There are also studies that when used on patients with certain diseases it becomes dangerous so...timing and situation appears to be the key here.

[Heavencloud]

What does Trump gain by peddling this miracle drug? Does he think can just rig the numbers and pretend people aren’t packing ICU’s?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

What do you think the ICU census was pre-covid?

[Salodin]

Amazing he doesn't even comment on his own fake videos

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk

[Zealot]

https://retractionwatch.com/retracte...vid-19-papers/



Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

[Heavencloud]

Amazing he doesn't even comment on his own fake videos

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk

Not really much to say? I have same opinion as Joe Lapado, that UCLA doc. Seems YouTube scrubbed all evidence of the video though. Agenda much?

[Heavencloud]

Twitter removed it too lol
Don't these lefties know about the Streisand effect?

[Zealot]

So you're just doubling down on it, word.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

[Zealot]

I saw a video about how you specifically have a prostate tumor that stretches up to your brain and causes shit to randomly spew out your eyeballs. It got taken down by social media sites but I think that's all because of there's an agenda to hide the truth about your eye shits. There was a lady in the video with a lab coat on outdoors in 93 degree weather so you know she was a real doctor.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

[Milkster]

Not really much to say? I have same opinion as Joe Lapado, that UCLA doc. Seems YouTube scrubbed all evidence of the video though. Agenda much?

So you're purposefully helping spread and keep up disingenious medical information that isn't proven to do what exactly?

[Byrthnoth]

This was my chloroquine take from March 20th:

wrt chloroquine, it has already been extensively tested in humans so they know it is safe to consume (if you take the right dose).

To give a little background on how drug testing works, the major cost when testing a new drug is proving that it isn't harmful, not showing efficacy. That is why the first stop for every disease is to throw literally the bathroom cabinet at it. Try everything that people think might work that is already approved, because it has already passed safety testing.

The chloroquine fanclub has existed in biotech for decades and, while they've generally failed to show efficacy for anything but malaria, it has been tested through and fucking through for safety. Maybe it'll help the virus, maybe it won't, but it honestly won't hurt people (unless they don't take the right dosage), so why not?

Since then, the possibility that it actually does something has dimmed significantly and the scientific consensus has formed around "results are bad enough that it is not worth the time to investigate it further."

It's time to cut bait. The only reason to use it at this point is if the person you're treating is a Trump fan and you're doing it unblinded hoping for some kind of placebo effect. It's still pretty safe, but why use something that has failed to show efficacy in most studies and has shown only a weak benefit/harm in the others?


PS. I am unaware of peer reviewed youtube videos

[Yabby]

Not really much to say? I have same opinion as Joe Lapado, that UCLA doc. Seems YouTube scrubbed all evidence of the video though. Agenda much?

Correct, Not spreading fake and staged news is an agenda. It's like if they took a Hippocratic oath and took it seriously.