George Floyd (III): Defending Child Shooters Edition

[Andalusian girls]

except cops, you can't hold them accountable even if they murder an innocent woman in her bed executing an arrest warrant at the wrong house for a suspect that was already in custody

[Day]

And has there been any punishment for anyone involved in the lack of communication that resulted in the death of an innocent person?

Cause so far the only thing I'm seeing is a slap on the wrist for some wall damage

i said way back the person responsible for the warrant should face punishment i agree with you

[Vaspinne]

i said way back the person responsible for the warrant should face punishment i agree with you

My bad, only read the last page

[Salodin]

Isnt the Breonna case the one where the cop had residue on his pants, which couldn't come from the boyfriend who was shooting from a distance?

I mean, they could easily determine which gun it game from, but yall are wondering why they haven't released ballistics on the bullet? Have you learned nothing from the lying cops in every video of them busting up civil liberties?

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk

[NynJa]

A sanctioned raid at the wrong address for a suspect they already had in custody prior to said raid at the wrong address

They had the right address.

[kuronosan]

They had the right address.

But the wrong people. Neither Walker nor Taylor were suspects. Her ex, however, was.

Sent from my SM-G986U using Tapatalk

[Vaspinne]

They had the right address.

Where was this verified? All I'm seeing is that they went to the wrong place

[Rhyis.]

Because the warrant was illegal, and they killed somebody? Charge the officer who issued the warrant? Charge the judge who signed off on it? Charge somebody. Don't charge 'nobody'.

Every step of the process failed and that's not okay.

Sent from my SM-G986U using Tapatalk

again, how do you criminally charge a judge (or whoever) for putting the wrong address/person/whatever on a warrant? it isn't a criminal offense

[NynJa]

But the wrong people. Neither Walker nor Taylor were suspects. Her ex, however, was.

Sent from my SM-G986U using Tapatalk

I'm pretty sure Taylor's apartment was listed on the warrant. How her name and apartment got there was at best incompetency, at worst purely racism, but the warrant was for the proper address.

[Day]

i thought the warrant was approved for there because they suspected her ex was sending drugs there?

[Qalbert]

Isnt the Breonna case the one where the cop had residue on his pants, which couldn't come from the boyfriend who was shooting from a distance?

I mean, they could easily determine which gun it game from, but yall are wondering why they haven't released ballistics on the bullet? Have you learned nothing from the lying cops in every video of them busting up civil liberties?

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk

https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/v...cop-in-the-leg

According to Mattingly’s testimony, Walker was approximately 20 feet away when he fired his weapon and shot the officer in the leg. But photos of Mattingly’s wound depict a bruising pattern and coloration consistent with having been shot from close proximity, according to Patrick McLaughlin, who teaches forensic science at the John Jay College of Criminal Justice and served as a detective in the NYPD for 20 years.

“The easiest way to know for sure if he was shot from close up is through a gunshot residue test,” said McLaughlin, who spent most of his tenure at the NYPD in the Evidence Collection Team. The test detects gun powder residue, the presence of which indicates someone or something was shot from within three feet. McLaughlin described the test as standard procedure in cases like this.

But no gunshot residue test appears to have been performed on Mattingly’s wound or clothing immediately following the incident or at any time before the end of May, when the criminal case against Walker was dropped. A preliminary medical report on Mattingly’s wound, which was part of discovery in Walker’s criminal case, found no visible soot or residue on Mattingly’s pants and indicates he was shot from “distant range.”

McLaughlin, who reviewed the preliminary report, said he thought it was plausible the unusual bruising pattern was caused by Sgt. Mattingly’s wallet, which was in his front pocket, even if he wasn’t shot at close range, as the crime scene photos suggest. The bullet went through the wallet and his leg, puncturing his femoral artery.

McLaughlin also thinks it’s possible that what looks like gun powder residue is actually something else. But he added that “in a case like this where you have the chance to let science help support or refute something, I just don't understand why you wouldn't perform the test.”

[kuronosan]

again, how do you criminally charge a judge (or whoever) for putting the wrong address/person/whatever on a warrant? it isn't a criminal offense

They signed a warrant that didn't meet the criteria for the law.

I mean, if I signed a prescription for Percocet without even looking at the patient's chart because someone told me to and they overdose and die I'm still responsible.

Sent from my SM-G986U using Tapatalk

[NynJa]

Where was this verified? All I'm seeing is that they went to the wrong place

I'm pretty sure we went over this a month ago when Zealot of all people had to step in and tell everyone to fuck off cause I was right, and I linked no less than 4 or 5 URL's all affirming as such.

[Salodin]

Narrator: "Everyone except the retards on BG knew why they didn't perform the test"

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk

[Salodin]

I'm pretty sure we went over this a month ago when Zealot of all people had to step in and tell everyone to fuck off cause I was right, and I linked no less than 4 or 5 URL's all affirming as such.

No one gives a fuck cause the guy was already in custody god damn

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk

[Vaspinne]

I'm pretty sure we went over this a month ago when Zealot of all people had to step in and tell everyone to fuck off cause I was right, and I linked no less than 4 or 5 URL's all affirming as such.

Oh my bad for not knowing the conversations you had a month ago

[Vaspinne]

No one gives a fuck cause the guy was already in custody god damn

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk

This

[Day]

i thought the warrant was approved for there because they suspected her ex was sending drugs there?

how does this square with having the guy in custody? was the guy in custody her ex?

if i'm being honest sounds like 6 of us that only know vague details of the case arguing about it

[NynJa]

You: The warrant was for the wrong place
Me: Actually it wasnt
You: Doesnt matter cause the suspect was in custody

Oh my bad for not knowing the conversations you had a month ago

Keep up son.

[Vaspinne]

You: The warrant was for the wrong place
Me: Actually it wasnt
You: Doesnt matter cause the suspect was in custody

Welp my original post included both notes but you know. And I'm happy to concede if I'm incorrect