If the police fail, you take them to the courts. If the courts fail, you take it to the streets. If the streets fail, then you start taking matters into your own hands.
If the police fail, you take them to the courts. If the courts fail, you take it to the streets. If the streets fail, then you start taking matters into your own hands.
I'm not advocating for anything. Any one of those things can take years. Generations even. That's just facts based on how it's always gone down historically. Maybe not here though. Not yet anyway.
You're also in a democracy, so I think if the courts fail you go to the polls and vote in new people who appoint court judges first before going rogue. But whether that comes before or after going to the streets????
That part's been failing for over 250 years now.
When it comes to systemic racism, I can't argue that at all
what is you wicked fuckin nerds on about the system has been improving for 250 years when it comes to systemic racism
250 years ago it was 1770 and if you think hard you can probably identify some improvements re the nation's treatment of minorities between then and now
Surely not! Haven't you heard about Trump's Platinum Plan™?
https://twitter.com/wsteaks/status/1309550180564426753
Of course there has been improvements, that can't be disputed. I'm trying to find a video that I can't remember where exactly the source of it was, but basically it explained the steps of how despite losing the civil war, the tactics used by white supremacists evolved over time to things like modern policing, the Jim Crow laws, the war on drugs, stop and frisk and etc, etc. That's kind of the point I'm going for there, but for the life of me I can't remember where I watched the video
You keep saying the cops didn't get charged. Thats not true. They got charged with other shit they did wrong, they just didn't bother investigating the...ya know...the murder...
Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk
The cops got charged for the bullets that missed.
Is it really too much to ask that the people involved in this fuck up be fired and charged with something considering their negligence and incompetence resulted in the death of an innocent woman? I'm reminded of that UPS driver that got killed by cops earlier this year when cops just started spraying in the middle of traffic while using the drivers stuck in that situation as shields. Of course nothing happened to those cops so I guess it is too much to ask.
jesus fuck. a charge that has to do with the killing of breonna taylor, which is what we've been discussing for the past 2 pages. the boyfriend shooter has already acknowledged on record that he was the one that shot first. that turns the incident into self defense during a raid for the cops no different than this guy shooting at cops is considered self defense from a potential home invasion
for the umpteenth time in this thread, if you want to be mad about something be mad about dumb ass american gun laws. that boyfriend would be tossed in jail up here if he started to randomly fire at people in "self defense" when nobody had harmed him or threatened his life. there's the odd case that gets thrown out but in general you can't just start shooting people that haven't actually harmed you and you sure as shit can't shoot people for trying to steal your shit. yall laws are made for creating these situations