
Originally Posted by
Karbuncle
I can agree, kinda, but I do think this societal bias can work both ways, and sometimes it has unfortunate outcomes. With just a pile of unproven anecdotal stories, public sentiment seemed to be overwhelmingly on Ambers side around the time of the article this case is about, I seem to recall JD getting shitcanned and blacklisted from all his roles upcoming and current, simply from the accusation before any trials. Because the accusations were severe, and disgusting, of course no one would want to be tied to that. I mean sure you still had some people on JDs side, the same Anti-MeToo warriors or just Pirates fans who didnt want to believe it, but (as was shown in the Trial btw) public sentiment in favor of JD didn't really peak until much later, at least on Twitter(#), where apparently we gather all this knowledge from now... She was the one getting TV spots and interviews about winning the 3mil and "Donating it" (Read: She didnt donate it).
Like dang, I guess this is a good example on how having all the same information can lead people to two completely different conclusions. I may not come to the same outcome as you but I still find it interesting that we both watched the same like.. 20~ Hours of Trial footage and arrived at different sides of the spectrum. Not saying this is negative to you or anything.