Yeah that tracks.
Day be like
Yall got any more of them sex videos, i needa logoff.
lolcomments
"Not sure what the background of a witness has to do with anything"
Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk
The guy who carries his own thermometer at 8:37.
I didn't hear "Everyone in this room is dumber for having listened to it" or "May God have mercy on your soul". I think the judge went easy on them.
California certified its results today, putting certified electoral ballots for Joe Biden at 279 and officially making him President-Elect.
I'm assuming that was the link to the audio of the court hearing. The person said they didn't know recording the audio wasn't allowed so they deleted it. There's another link and I listened to it at work, it's not really that interesting. Just ol' Sidney reciting her usual trash for 20 minutes followed by a judge being like "wtf no the election is over you crazy".
It ended with the judge saying something like "this is pretty much you asking me to overrule the will of 2.5 million GA voters and I'm not going to do that."
tl:dr of the audio
Judge: You waited so long to file all this shit, and you are asking the court to do something that isn't within our power. The court doesn't even have a way to roll-back certification.
Texas, via their State AG Ken Paxton, is suing Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Georgia and Michigan in the US Supreme Court seeking to invalidate their election results. People are suspecting this is just a sycophantic play for Paxton to get a pardon from Trump due to his being under investigation for crimes. No this suit won't succeed or go anywhere but the fact that any inane legal challenges are being patronized with no penalty or backlash for the Republicans is enraging. In one paragraph they actually cite the Daily Mail story.
https://www.democracydocket.com/wp-c...-Complaint.pdf
The outcome of the Electoral College vote
is directly affected by the constitutional violations
committed by Defendant States. Plaintiff State
complied with the Constitution in the process of
appointing presidential electors for President Trump.
Defendant States violated the Constitution in the
process of appointing presidential electors by
unlawfully abrogating state election laws designed to
protect the integrity of the ballots and the electoral
process, and those violations proximately caused the
appointment of presidential electors for former Vice
President Biden. Plaintiff State will therefore be
injured if Defendant States’ unlawfully certify these
presidential electors.
God Bless Standing.
I dunno if the above and what I'm about to post are related but:
https://twitter.com/scotusreporter/s...511399936?s=19
InB4 SCOTUS with it's 6-3 conservative lean and with it's 3 Trump appointed judges are conspiring to steal the election for Sleepy Joe
@17:00 On the subject of "Can the president pardon himself?" TLDR: Maybe, it's never really been brought to the test of courts and it would depend on how the supreme court interprets a potential pardon review. If the SCOTUS chose not to review it, the next presidential admin could pursue federal crimes against the former and when protesting that he was pardoned it would become a case that would very likely elevate to a SCOTUS review.
Granted that A.) Biden publicly calls for unity and most suspect won't be eager to pursue punishing Trump but perhaps people acting on his behalf would. B.) Even if it did go to SCOTUS it's now mostly Republicans and Trump appointees so would they be partisan. If a president is allowed to pardon themselves then they're basically untouchable except by impeachment which congress never seems to have an appetite for. Is that something SCOTUS would be willing to let Trump, the most undeserving of bastards, to get away with as a trade of to allow ALL future presidents to be above the law?