And anyone wanting to marry Chelsea to secure the bag, this is your future 3 months after:
![]()
And anyone wanting to marry Chelsea to secure the bag, this is your future 3 months after:
![]()
manafort removed from flight to dubai over revoked passport.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-aid...142453406.html
Utter trash. He is still under investigation for the much more open and explicit election tampering in Georgia. The grand jury for that starts on May 2nd.
The Democratic party has to severely scrutinize EVERY New York governor/mayor/AG/DA candidate and they should not have let this happen. Eric Adams turned out to be a corrupt fraud immediately after he won election and now this.
https://twitter.com/MuellerSheWrote/...AOiU5tur88U37A
I think that prosecuting Trump for anything and everything is a fool's errand. There's likely to be a hung jury because you'll get at least one Republican on the jury and Trump and the GOP will use it to cry witch hunt the entire time.
You go after Trump when you can use the courtroom to slam him in the court of public opinion by airing a bunch of dirty laundry.
Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk
I would be so happy if this turned into an Andrew Wakefield situation where by suing he accidentally give his target access to materials he was trying to hide, since they're now germane in the lawsuit.
Like most Trump-generated content, I cannot even understand the claim here. Is he saying that Hillary made him surround himself with Russia-aligned figures?
Well he's just lying and denying the fact that he is a Russian asset, which would absolutely come out in discovery. His lawyers for this suit can be found at (seriously) legalbrains.com
https://twitter.com/MattGertz/status...YHnzaRUVhE4Oqg
https://web.archive.org/web/20210802...galbrains.com/
Only the finest Florida strip mall attorneys folks.
Is there a compilation of all the legal counsel Trump has gone trough at this point?
How will Donnie wiggle his way out of this one?
The only way he gets convicted is if he makes fun of Jada.
Would it seriously be out of line for the prosecution to reject all republicans in a theoretical jury selection?
Voir dire would be a nightmare already without the prosecution and defense arguing whether "Are you a registered Republican" should be a permissible screening question. And it would feed Trump's narrative about it being a witch hunt.
Even though at this point no one who is a Trump voter could be considered neutral.
Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk
Would ANY registered party member be neutral?
In a legal sense, you would be biased the other way too.
I mean that's why I said it would be a nightmare. Imagine a party of independents, people who are too wishy washy to make up their damn minds about whether or not the GOP would throw them under the bus. You want a group of them to make a decisive decision about whether Trump's actions amount to treason?