
Originally Posted by
Salodin
Because this is mostly local elections and not national? IDK man, seems kinda relevant. He doesn't need to cheat and win with an 80% popular vote. He needs to win by .1%, and the closer it is the better. Why try and make it super obvious? You seem to be making assumptions about something you don't even agree with and then presenting it as our claim.
The "cheating" has many flavors you completely hand wave. ICE fucking up voting stations and scaring away voters next year, defending or pressuring certain polls to close early or not open, sending the wrong ballots, never sending out mail in ballots, all absolutely count as "cheating" but for some reason (correct me if I'm wrong) you seem to assume this cheating is gonna be in the excel spreadsheet they use to tabulate votes. I think they're good enough at this to be more insidious, and cruel.
Sent from my SM-S936U using Tapatalk