Just how brutal us humans can be. :\

[Raivyn]

Well, not only are you "really dumb", but you're a blind ideologist who is impressionable to the point of puppetry.

So you don't like uneducated people? But you couldn't take the time to educate yourself in regards to the length of the video? Nice try but it's 27 minutes long, so I was through nearly a third of it when I made that post.

Also sad that you can't educate yourself properly on the rules of engagement and the facets of the geneva convention. But hey, why go out and do any research on your own, right? The oh-so credible news network never has any hidden agenda ever, and they're ready to give you all the information you need to understand a story completely, right?

Too bad you didn't take the time to educate yourself before you went off on a baseless, overgeneralized rant. Now you just look like an arrogant and uneducated fool.

Good lord I'll even give you a helping hand - go look up the rules of engagement regarding chemical weapons, napalm and all firebomb / feul-air explosives, don't forget to check the geneva convention agreement (which, by the way, the insurgents don't observe, fyi).

Also if you'd done your research you would know that the citizens of fallujah were given 48 hours to evacuate under U.S. supervision, with full warning that anyone who stayed would be subject to targeting and detainment.

Another quick point FYI: Just because you see a body doesn't mean that body wasn't holding a weapon at one point. Especially when you see it in a body bag or on a stretcher.

Come on man, use the brain that god gave you and think for yourself.

The "you're really dumb" part was in fact an attack because in your statement you made it apparent that you made an assumption based on a fraction of the material that you were allotted.

Actually, I said "I have not seen anything yet". I realize attention to detail is hard to your limited mind but please at least try to keep up.

And if you took the time to actually read my post I said "like 40 minutes" I admit I didn't waste my time and look up the actual time of the video to argue with some ingrate over the internet. However I did make an approximation that in effect got my point across, which was my objective; you took it upon yourself to turn a blind eye to my primary point and attack my technical faults. I even used the word "like" as a disclaimer that it was an approximation, it may be subject to fault, and that the actual number wasn't of relevance, solely the fact that you made a generalization about something just by observing a portion of its content.

Yes, 'like' is an approximation. However your true intent was obviously to exaggerate the length of the video in order to undermine what I said. Everything above is long-winded bullshit. I will hand it to you though, you're good at bullshitting.

And sorry I prefer not to educate myself on flawed laws created by faulty corrupt human beings. I didn't know that the Geneva Convention was the be-all end-all universal law on what is "right" for war. Nothing is "right" about war and just because it is in the bounds of legality does not make it right. In fact, I never once stated that the video showed footage of "war crimes" or anything of that relevance. I said it was disturbing and the United States was being hypocritial.

Actually the Geneva Convention was cooked up by nurses and social justice advocates, not the evil Republican party of the U.S. FYI the Geneva Convention pretty much is the be-all end-all for conduct in theater.

On another point, there are many "right" things about war, which is far from nothing. It all depends on which war and who was doing what. But hey, who has time for all that crap, right? Let's all go be uneducated like yourself, we can all form baseless opinions and have a hell of a time! :wink:

In reference to the bolded statement, by calling the U.S. hypocritical you are saying they are using chemical weapons to fight a war against chemical weapons. Therefore you are accusing them of warcrimes. One side or the other, it's quite black and white. So pick an argument. However if the above is your argument (as it seems to be based on the video and everything you said about it and now) you're wrong, because WP is not defined as a chemical weapon by the CWC.

Oh but that's right, international law isn't important or anything.

Hypocrisy is my problem right now. I've put an unfathomable amount of effort into defining the world around me by exploring every point of view, bias, and condition. I am searching for absolutes that are not affected by opinion and give a true definition. Hypocrisy is one of the few absolutes that I have found. I will give a series of examples for those of you who may not understand what I mean. I have taken certain "characteristics" and tried to define them under the subjective categories as "good" or "bad". For example when someone says honesty is a "good" thing I looked at it from the point of view where if a person were 100% honest they would appear as an asshole to other people. If a person candidly believed that a certain piece of work a person spent their entire life on was trash, and the author asked for their opinion, the honest person would end up insulting the author. Selfishness is another example; one could come up with an unbound amount of circumstances when being selfish could be either "good" or "bad". However, HYPOCRISY, what I believe is an "absolute", has no condition or circumstance when it could be considered a "good" thing, therfore making it absolutely "bad"

Nice big block of rhetoric, moving right along.

That was what I found most disturbing about the footage. Not the actual use of chemical weapons on civilians innocent individuals, but the fact that the American nation invaded Iraq under the motive that they were producing and using these chemical weapons. America: the ultimate hypocrit.

Ah there it is, your argument. Well there you are, being wrong, because as I said before, WP is not a chemical weapon.

And I'd apologize that the time you spent doing research just to "prove me wrong" on a subject that had no relevance to my arguement was in vain, however I'm not sorry. If you hadn't made such a quick assumption on the conflict I was trying to present, the time you spent educating yourself to futily attack a miscellenious person over the internet could have been put to a better use. I'm glad you wasted your time, my own personal opinion is that people like you don't deserve the time that they've already been given because they make such little relevant use of it.

1) I didn't have to do any research except watch the video. I try to keep myself informed, unlike yourself.

2) Ah so I see you're moving past being full of shit and moving up to being a total asshole. Nice move. Way to prove your excellent moral standing.

Hypocrisy is my problem right now.

And I don't think I've put more sincere feeling into telling a person they don't deserve to live; but in this case, I truely believe you don't deserve the life you've been given and you would be of better use dead.

Interesting.

Well if you want me dead why don't you kill me with some nerve gas or an actual chemical weapon then.

The idea that WP doesn't burn through clothing is preposterous.

Effects of exposure to WP weapons
Incandescent particles of WP cast off by a WP weapon's initial explosion can produce extensive, deep (second and third degree), painful burns. Phosphorus burns carry a greater risk of mortality than other forms of burns due to the absorption of phosphorus into the body through the burned area, resulting in liver, heart and kidney damage, and in some cases multi-organ failure. [4] These weapons are particularly dangerous to exposed personnel because white phosphorus continues to burn unless deprived of oxygen or until it is completely consumed, in some cases burning right down to the bone. In some cases, burns may be limited to areas of exposed skin because the smaller WP particles do not burn completely through personal clothing before being consumed. According to GlobalSecurity.org, quoted by "The Guardian", "White phosphorus results in painful chemical burn injuries" [5] .

Selective reading FTW.

It says right there it burns through clothing.

NSFW
http://www.uruknet.info/uruknet-images/ach5.jpeg

The situation that is describing is small particles causing limited burns, not full immolation.

The above picture is a 'victim' of the incident described in the video. Not that his clothing isn't burned, but his face and hands are. Before you go screaming about WP and hypocrisy till you're blue in the face, consider what the sun does to bodies left out in it. Then lok at that picture. The burns are almost undoubtedly caused by the sun, and the fact that the bodies were allowed to rot for days outside.

Once again, use your brain. The news is full of shit.

And if you were the fat kid it'd be a different story.

No, it wouldn't be a different story.
I love how some people that I've never even met before try to tell me what I would think. Last time they WEREN'T me and I WAS me. Maybe that's changed by now, but I'm confident I know myself better then you do; you can't tell me what "I'd" do because you're not me.

Hahahaha I won't even address this, that was the most juvenile argument I've seen all year, I'm almost sure of it.

[Hendrix]

Sad

This topic needs more happiness... hmm, let's see.

Oh! Hay cubone, level your avatar:

http://pokemonarereal.ytmnd.com/

LMAO

[Ashen]

Actually, I said "I have not seen anything yet". I realize attention to detail is hard to your limited mind but please at least try to keep up.

I'm sorry but if you think that a soldier shooting at a 10 year old boy shooting an AK-47 instrument of death at him is worse than a mercenary shooting an unarmed civilian you are probably full of blind ideological rage

I consider saying im full of blind ideological rage more then just saying "I have not seen anything yet."

Yes, 'like' is an approximation. However your true intent was obviously to exaggerate the length of the video in order to undermine what I said. Everything above is long-winded bullshit. I will hand it to you though, you're good at bullshitting.

Yet again you are putting your words in my mouth. You're telling me what my true intent was. I clearly, obviously, and blantantly said that my point was that you were only witnessing a fraction of the material. And WITHIN THE SAME SENTENCE of the oh-so exaggeration of the length to "undermine" you, I said "you've just licked the iceberg." THAT was my true intent. I'm tired of reitterating everything to you. Accept it. You're arguing with a wall, you can't convince me what my own opinion is.

Actually the Geneva Convention was cooked up by nurses and social justice advocates, not the evil Republican party of the U.S. FYI the Geneva Convention pretty much is the be-all end-all for conduct in theater.

On another point, there are many "right" things about war, which is far from nothing. It all depends on which war and who was doing what. But hey, who has time for all that crap, right? Let's all go be uneducated like yourself, we can all form baseless opinions and have a hell of a time!

In reference to the bolded statement, by calling the U.S. hypocritical you are saying they are using chemical weapons to fight a war against chemical weapons. Therefore you are accusing them of warcrimes. One side or the other, it's quite black and white. So pick an argument. However if the above is your argument (as it seems to be based on the video and everything you said about it and now) you're wrong, because WP is not defined as a chemical weapon by the CWC.

Oh but that's right, international law isn't important or anything.

I never said that the Geneva Convention was headed by evil republicans or any other bullshit like that. When I said flawed corrupt people, I was talking about the human race. Show me a flawless human.

Show me something "right" about a war and I'll show you something wrong about with what's "right"

I am not accusing the US of war crimes. Being hypocritical isn't a war crime. Fighting with "legal" chemical weapons isn't a war crime. I never once said that the US is guilty of war crimes. I just said the US was being hypocritical.

Just because it's not defined by the CWC doesn't mean it's not a chemical weapon. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_phosphorous Read the very first paragraph. It's an allatrope of the chemical element phosphorous, causes serious chemical burns, and considered by many, including the U.S. Armed Forces, to be a chemical weapon when used against personnel.
Here is a link to a U.S. Armed Forces document calling white phosphorus a chemical weapon:
http://www.gulflink.osd.mil/declassd...31050_91r.html

The above picture is a 'victim' of the incident described in the video. Not that his clothing isn't burned, but his face and hands are. Before you go screaming about WP and hypocrisy till you're blue in the face, consider what the sun does to bodies left out in it. Then lok at that picture. The burns are almost undoubtedly caused by the sun, and the fact that the bodies were allowed to rot for days outside.

Are you implying that the sun can burn away humans to the BONE within a short amount of time. Because by your selective reading (meaning you completely missed the part where it said WORD FOR WORD "in some cases burning right down to the bone.") I am assuming that is what you are implying.

And explain yourself on the following accusations:

How was I "full of shit" don't just say it. Back yourself. Use defined examples that can clearly explain to me why you're point of view is correct and mine is flawed.
Continue with the above explanation and tell me how I've become an asshole, and yet again, how is your opinion valid?
How am I a hypocrit for saying you would be better use dead?
Where did I say I wanted to personally kill you? (I'll give you a hint with this one: I didn't. I just said you don't deserve your life, I never said I wanted to end it.)

And for FUCK SAKE. How the fuck do you say "the news is full of shit" and those burns were caused by the sun when it was apparent not only on video footage but also the following images that they used white phosphorus on those people:
http://www.rainews24.rai.it/ran24/in...osforo/001.jpg
http://www.rainews24.rai.it/ran24/in...osforo/002.jpg
http://www.rainews24.rai.it/ran24/in...osforo/003.jpg
http://www.rainews24.rai.it/ran24/in...osforo/004.jpg
http://www.rainews24.rai.it/ran24/in...osforo/005.jpg
http://www.rainews24.rai.it/ran24/in...osforo/006.jpg

[Raivyn]

Actually, I said "I have not seen anything yet". I realize attention to detail is hard to your limited mind but please at least try to keep up.

[quote:e0a88]I'm sorry but if you think that a soldier shooting at a 10 year old boy shooting an AK-47 instrument of death at him is worse than a mercenary shooting an unarmed civilian you are probably full of blind ideological rage

I consider saying im full of blind ideological rage more then just saying "I have not seen anything yet."

Yes, 'like' is an approximation. However your true intent was obviously to exaggerate the length of the video in order to undermine what I said. Everything above is long-winded bullshit. I will hand it to you though, you're good at bullshitting.

Yet again you are putting your words in my mouth. You're telling me what my true intent was. I clearly, obviously, and blantantly said that my point was that you were only witnessing a fraction of the material. And WITHIN THE SAME SENTENCE of the oh-so exaggeration of the length to "undermine" you, I said "you've just licked the iceberg." THAT was my true intent. I'm tired of reitterating everything to you. Accept it. You're arguing with a wall, you can't convince me what my own opinion is.

Actually the Geneva Convention was cooked up by nurses and social justice advocates, not the evil Republican party of the U.S. FYI the Geneva Convention pretty much is the be-all end-all for conduct in theater.

On another point, there are many "right" things about war, which is far from nothing. It all depends on which war and who was doing what. But hey, who has time for all that crap, right? Let's all go be uneducated like yourself, we can all form baseless opinions and have a hell of a time!

In reference to the bolded statement, by calling the U.S. hypocritical you are saying they are using chemical weapons to fight a war against chemical weapons. Therefore you are accusing them of warcrimes. One side or the other, it's quite black and white. So pick an argument. However if the above is your argument (as it seems to be based on the video and everything you said about it and now) you're wrong, because WP is not defined as a chemical weapon by the CWC.

Oh but that's right, international law isn't important or anything.

I never said that the Geneva Convention was headed by evil republicans or any other bullshit like that. When I said flawed corrupt people, I was talking about the human race. Show me a flawless human.

Show me something "right" about a war and I'll show you something wrong about with what's "right"

I am not accusing the US of war crimes. Being hypocritical isn't a war crime. Fighting with "legal" chemical weapons isn't a war crime. I never once said that the US is guilty of war crimes. I just said the US was being hypocritical.

Just because it's not defined by the CWC doesn't mean it's not a chemical weapon. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_phosphorous Read the very first paragraph. It's an allatrope of the chemical element phosphorous, causes serious chemical burns, and considered by many, including the U.S. Armed Forces, to be a chemical weapon when used against personnel.
Here is a link to a U.S. Armed Forces document calling white phosphorus a chemical weapon:
http://www.gulflink.osd.mil/declassd...31050_91r.html

The above picture is a 'victim' of the incident described in the video. Not that his clothing isn't burned, but his face and hands are. Before you go screaming about WP and hypocrisy till you're blue in the face, consider what the sun does to bodies left out in it. Then lok at that picture. The burns are almost undoubtedly caused by the sun, and the fact that the bodies were allowed to rot for days outside.

Are you implying that the sun can burn away humans to the BONE within a short amount of time. Because by your selective reading (meaning you completely missed the part where it said WORD FOR WORD "in some cases burning right down to the bone.") I am assuming that is what you are implying.

And explain yourself on the following accusations:

How was I "full of shit" don't just say it. Back yourself. Use defined examples that can clearly explain to me why you're point of view is correct and mine is flawed.
Continue with the above explanation and tell me how I've become an asshole, and yet again, how is your opinion valid?
How am I a hypocrit for saying you would be better use dead?
Where did I say I wanted to personally kill you? (I'll give you a hint with this one: I didn't. I just said you don't deserve your life, I never said I wanted to end it.)

And for FUCK SAKE. How the fuck do you say "the news is full of shit" and those burns were caused by the sun when it was apparent not only on video footage but also the following images that they used white phosphorus on those people:
http://www.rainews24.rai.it/ran24/in...osforo/001.jpg
http://www.rainews24.rai.it/ran24/in...osforo/002.jpg
http://www.rainews24.rai.it/ran24/in...osforo/003.jpg
http://www.rainews24.rai.it/ran24/in...osforo/004.jpg
http://www.rainews24.rai.it/ran24/in...osforo/005.jpg
http://www.rainews24.rai.it/ran24/in...osforo/006.jpg[/quote:e0a88]

I'm not going to argue ridiculous semantics with you when by now everyone can see you are full of shit. You know your true intent was to try to make me look stupid, evidence of this is seen when you say "You are really dumb". Come on dude, you're a horrible liar.

Anyhow - no I didn't say the sun could burn to the bone, but ...

ok are you retarded? If you were mentally disabled I could understand, white phosphorus isn't the only thing that can kill humans on the battle field. You do know that tumbling rounds rip people apart, right? Hollow points expose bone when they go through people. Judging be the fact that the corpse is missing part of his skull I would say that he was shot in the face. Newsflash, a body left in the sun will rot decompose and shrivel at an alarming rate, let alone the hot desert sun of Iraq. If enough white phosphorus to cause those burns hit that man then his shirt would have been immolated as well, along with his entire body. Anyhow, I'm no medical examiner, but neither are you, and it appears I have the capacity to think things through.

Yes WP is a weapon with chemical components but it is not a chemical weapon in the same sense as those which are outlawed.

ALSO WP is legal to use as a weapon against personel, just not in civilian occupied areas (ie: areas of a city like baghdad where you have small insurgent populations). This does not prohibit it's use in fallujah, whose citizens were given 48 hours to evacuate, then the entire city was declared a warzone.

HOWEVER the WP being deployed in those photos is being used as an illuminant. I fail to see 1) people and 2) indiscriminate use.

Third time I'm saying it - get a brain.

I consider saying im full of blind ideological rage more then just saying "I have not seen anything yet."

oh but by your own logic, isn't it ok for me to say that since I put the condition of IF in my statement? Blah blah blah, see, you don't even believe what you say (if it doesn't serve your purposes exclusively, that is).

Where did I say I wanted to personally kill you? (I'll give you a hint with this one: I didn't. I just said you don't deserve your life, I never said I wanted to end it.)

Oh so it's totally okay to just run around saying people don't deserve to live and all that - especially since you're such an enlightened champion of personal freedoms. What a load of shit. I may be of better use dead to you, since that would mean I wouldn't be here challenging your bullshit, but that's about the only way I can think of myself being 'more useful' dead. What are you, a dictator in training? Self-righteous asshole.

[Raivyn]

I am not accusing the US of war crimes. Being hypocritical isn't a war crime. Fighting with "legal" chemical weapons isn't a war crime. I never once said that the US is guilty of war crimes. I just said the US was being hypocritical.

And once again it's one or the other. Pick a fucking argument and stick by it. Come on, you've already wished death upon another human being in this thread, what's a little baseless accusation gonna do - further debase people's opinion of you? Don't think that's possible.

[Ashen]

I'm tired of this petty quarrel. You're not worth my time. I'd rather you revel in your false assumptions abuot someone you don't even know then bless you with knowing exactly who I am. I am not surrendering. You did not win. I can counter any arguement you make, however it would be futile due to the fact it's hard to drill new thought into a skull denser then the core of the Earth. You learned nothing from this. I learned nothing from this. I sincerely wish I could have the time I spent responding to your false accusations given back to me.

[Raivyn]

I'm tired of this petty quarrel. You're not worth my time. I'd rather you revel in your false assumptions abuot someone you don't even know then bless you with knowing exactly who I am. I am not surrendering. You did not win. I can counter any arguement you make, however it would be futile due to the fact it's hard to drill new thought into a skull denser then the core of the Earth. You learned nothing from this. I learned nothing from this. I sincerely wish I could have the time I spent responding to your false accusations given back to me.

AHAHAHAHA omg you egotistical fuck.

Oh well, it's the M.O. of people like you to tuck and run.

Your so called counterpoints are horrible, as were your original points. Your attempts at wit were pathetic, just as your convoluted attempts at justifying your position. Too bad for you saying things like "You deserve to die" just shows your true character for what it is, that of a presumptuous baffoon.

Well whatever, keep trying to make yourself look/feel smart and worldly. Hope you have a nice high school graduation.

Peace (through superior firepower).

[Alegu]

Raivyn wins

[Raivyn]

Raivyn wins

/bow

Thank you sir.

[Ashen]

Raivyn wins

Tell me what he won.

Your so called counterpoints are horrible, as were your original points. Your attempts at wit were pathetic, just as your convoluted attempts at justifying your position. Too bad for you saying things like "You deserve to die" just shows your true character for what it is, that of a presumptuous baffoon.

Prove it. Your lack of proof is your downfall. You state your opinon and that is it. Just because my counterpoints are terrible in your point of view does not mean they are terrible by definition. You call me egotistical because I said that you don't deserve to know me, however I can call you egotistical because you accept the fact that your opinion supercedes everyone elses. You define things by your point of view without looking at anyone elses. You won in your eyes. I won in my eyes. So who won? Who has the absolute authority to say who's opinion was right and who's opinion was wrong. Our peers sure as hell don't, and neither do we due to bias. How do you define a winner in this situation. Tell me.

[Gafgarionn]

You define things by your point of view without looking at anyone elses.

That's pretty damn ironic coming from you, considering you were the one trying to tell everyone else they did not know what "disturbing" was.

You people are soooooo fucking ignorant.

http://www.rainews24.rai.it/ran24/inchi ... /video.asp

If you think british mercenaries shooting at cars is disturbing, then the video/documentary in the link I just posted would make you wonder if Hell has stemmed itself into the Earth in the Middle East.

Hypocrisy is my problem right now.

Apparently so...

[Ashen]

You define things by your point of view without looking at anyone elses.

That's pretty damn ironic coming from you, considering you were the one trying to tell everyone else they did not know what "disturbing" was.

Touché. finally a decent arguement with some valid proof.
But it wasn't my intention to define anyone elses point of view on what "disturbing" meant. It was, in fact, opposite of my intentions. I wanted them to see things from other peoples points of view to widen their own view. My view was just my primary example because I know my own point of view better then any other point of view.

Well, I wasn't really using "ignorant" as an insult, just using it in the context that it's pretty naive to think that soldiers shooting at random cars is disturbing in comparison to all of the other stuff that's going on that people don't know about. My example was the use of white phosphorous on Iraqis, someone else pointed out the russian POWs as another example. I just wanted to broaden peoples views on what "disturbing" actually is.

And when I said "Hypocrisy is my problem" I meant I have a conflict with Hypocrisy; I did not mean that I, myself, am hypocritical (however everyone is a hypocrit at one point or another).

[Raivyn]

Prove it. Your lack of proof is your downfall. You state your opinon and that is it. Just because my counterpoints are terrible in your point of view does not mean they are terrible by definition. You call me egotistical because I said that you don't deserve to know me, however I can call you egotistical because you accept the fact that your opinion supercedes everyone elses. You define things by your point of view without looking at anyone elses. You won in your eyes. I won in my eyes. So who won? Who has the absolute authority to say who's opinion was right and who's opinion was wrong. Our peers sure as hell don't, and neither do we due to bias. How do you define a winner in this situation. Tell me.

The proof is in your actions and mine.

For your information I have looked at this objectively and that video seems to be pretty much crap, just like all of your assumptions.

It isn't my opinion that WP burns through clothes, it is fact. I gave you the resources you need to look this up, you just can't see the forest through the trees.

Just because you are a blind ideologist that does not mean I'm one. Sorry, but I've been the only one to effectively argue anything but opinion in this little debate here.

You 'lose' because you just plain suck at arguing facts, and you argue opinions. I don't really care though, and who does?

PROTIP: Quickest way to lose an argument is to insult someone.

You're really dumb.

you don't deserve to live

you people are so fucking ignorant

You lose because you broke your own horses before it even left the gate.

[Raivyn]

Well, I wasn't really using "ignorant" as an insult, just using it in the context that it's pretty naive to think that soldiers shooting at random cars is disturbing in comparison to all of the other stuff that's going on that people don't know about. My example was the use of white phosphorous on Iraqis, someone else pointed out the russian POWs as another example. I just wanted to broaden peoples views on what "disturbing" actually is.

My ass you weren't using ignorant as an insult. It's obvious from the tone of your post. God you are ridiculous.

[Ashen]

PROTIP: Quickest way to lose an argument is to insult someone.

I'm tired of this petty quarrel. You're not worth my time. I'd rather you revel in your false assumptions abuot someone you don't even know then bless you with knowing exactly who I am. I am not surrendering. You did not win. I can counter any arguement you make, however it would be futile due to the fact it's hard to drill new thought into a skull denser then the core of the Earth. You learned nothing from this. I learned nothing from this. I sincerely wish I could have the time I spent responding to your false accusations given back to me.

AHAHAHAHA omg you egotistical fuck.

Oh well, it's the M.O. of people like you to tuck and run.

Your so called counterpoints are horrible, as were your original points. Your attempts at wit were pathetic, just as your convoluted attempts at justifying your position. Too bad for you saying things like "You deserve to die" just shows your true character for what it is, that of a presumptuous baffoon.

Well whatever, keep trying to make yourself look/feel smart and worldly. Hope you have a nice high school graduation.

Peace (through superior firepower).

[Raivyn]

That's the best you can do? Pathetic.

Pretty obvious that the argument was over at that point.

Call it hypocrisy if you will, but I'm gonna go ahead and fling moderate insults at the person who wished me death.

[Ashen]

Well, I wasn't really using "ignorant" as an insult, just using it in the context that it's pretty naive to think that soldiers shooting at random cars is disturbing in comparison to all of the other stuff that's going on that people don't know about. My example was the use of white phosphorous on Iraqis, someone else pointed out the russian POWs as another example. I just wanted to broaden peoples views on what "disturbing" actually is.

My ass you weren't using ignorant as an insult. It's obvious from the tone of your post. God you are ridiculous.

That was my 3rd post in this thread, before the conflict broke out. I justified myself THE SAME DAY I made my original post because I saw the ambiguity in my own post. And how the fuck do you hear tone from something I typed? Stop putting words in my mouth. You can't tell me what my own intentons were. YOU CAN'T. Get the fuck over it.

[Raivyn]

Well, I wasn't really using "ignorant" as an insult, just using it in the context that it's pretty naive to think that soldiers shooting at random cars is disturbing in comparison to all of the other stuff that's going on that people don't know about. My example was the use of white phosphorous on Iraqis, someone else pointed out the russian POWs as another example. I just wanted to broaden peoples views on what "disturbing" actually is.

My ass you weren't using ignorant as an insult. It's obvious from the tone of your post. God you are ridiculous.

That was my 3rd post in this thread, before the conflict broke out. I justified myself FIVE MINUTES after making my original post because I saw the ambiguity in my own post. And how the fuck do you hear tone from something I typed? Stop putting words in my mouth. You can't tell me what my own intentons were. YOU CAN'T. Get the fuck over it.

What the hell kind of high school do you go to? You don't take english? You've never heard of TONE DICTION AND SYNTAX???

Tone = writer's intent, attitude etc.

Diction = word choice, contributes to determining tone.

Syntax = phrasing, also contributes.

So I say again, your tone has been argumentative, inflammatory, and insulting from post 1 all the way through the entire thread.

You people are soooooo fucking ignorant.

http://www.rainews24.rai.it/ran24/inchi ... /video.asp

If you think british mercenaries shooting at cars is disturbing, then the video/documentary in the link I just posted would make you wonder if Hell has stemmed itself into the Earth in the Middle East.

And by the way, for all of you conservatives with closed-minds that will blame that documentary on propaganda and deny the credibility of what was taped because of bias, that documentary was sponsored by BBC. One of the most highly credible international news stations in the world.

And for all of you lazy bastards that won't take the time to watch the movie and be educated, one of the biggest points mentioned in there was the use of chemical weapons on militants as well as civilians by the Americans and British fighting against the Iraqis. Great fucking war, Bush. "zomg, iraq gotz teh chemicular wepons. let's zerg rush dem, lawl" Sup, hypocrisy. And I know someone's going to try and correct my attack on Bush and say that it's not his fault about what the military uses during the war, well I'm going to shut that arguement down right now by saying three words "Commander in Chief" and it was even stated in the interview that they waited for Bush to win the 2004 election before going in and massacring Falluja.

Sorry if this came off as an attack against anyone, I don't mean to offend people, but I just don't like it when people aren't educated.

so basically you just came into this thread and said "I KNOW MORE THAN ALL OF YOU WHO WANTS TO E-FIGHT ME??? NUBS". Real mature. Didn't feel like letting you get away with your little ego trip.

[Gafgarionn]

Just a tip Ashen, if you're not trying to offend others, don't say stuff like:

You people are soooooo fucking ignorant.

and

lazy bastards

I mean, you wouldn't want to provoke a fight, would you?

[Ashen]

Just a tip Ashen, if you're not trying to offend others, don't say stuff like:

You people are soooooo fucking ignorant.

and
[quote:126b1] lazy bastards

I mean, you wouldn't want to provoke a fight, would you?[/quote:126b1]

Well, I already justified myself in what I meant by saying that. I didn't originally mean for it to "insulting" and I didn't want to provoke a fight. I was trying to incite interest. It's sort of like reverse psychology in a sense. If I sit there and call you a pussy for not doing something, you're going to do it because I was insulting you about it. I called the people that didn't watch the video "lazy bastards" to get them to watch the video.

And Raivyn I'm done arguing with you. You're only arguing with yourself now, because you sure as hell haven't been arguing with me. You've put too many words into my mouth.