cue the venerable
WALL-O-TEXT
cue the venerable
WALL-O-TEXT
Hello, my name is:Originally Posted by Surealistic
WALL O' TEXT
Ask and you shall receive
I haven't read one bit of this thread btw~
If English is anything but your 3rd or 4th language...seek medical help.Originally Posted by Ordaned
Originally Posted by Ordaned
http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y38...o/walltext.jpg
WOW
On Migard- Pre Jan 29, 2006 we all hated each other equally
On Migard- Post Jan 29, 2006. I think it is now the jap LS Phantombrigade.
Originally Posted by Lockecole
ok i never sayed i was an english major, and well i didnt do to hot with english in school. but isnt this whole post talking about the ls's you hate on your server? heh, i guess i kinda got this coming to me cause my post does not make much sense but still i think you and the punks in apathetic got my point pretty good? lets lay off the writer for his/her poor writing skills and keep to the subject mmmk thanks.
btw apathetic ominous got faf last night where you at hello, but ls's on remora suck other than you. oh yeah who was it that got KB wasnt you or ominous, but once again ls's suck on remora, get a clue and tell your leader to get a life
Yea Ordaned claiming shit makes you good we forgot sorry. You're ls is fucking terrible you either just about wipe, wipe, or call for help everything you claim.
People hate Apathy because they are the best plain and simple.
They hated HiddenPower when they were on top and then Exodus and now Us.
Kill something actually hard and you can get some respect. Hajimari is trash. Ominous is trash. BOSS is trash. Antimatter is trash. Ominous should be more like Hajimari and do Limbus and easy ass Ouryu all day. When you can kill DL or Vrtra or hell even a fucking ground HNM with no problems like we do every time then talk.
Ominous and everybody just likes to run thier mouth and when we say shit back we're addictted to the game or some shit. Everybody really just needs to get the fuck off our dicks.
Antimatter is still together? Nice :D I was in that LS when it was an AF/post-AF LS on Asura.
BTW, you're a fag.
lol you got to be kidding correct. please dont ever tell me why i hate someone. do you live in my body? breath with my lungs? go fuck yourself chump, and dont ever fucking tell me why i hate someone. i hate apathetic plain and simply cause you have absolutely no respect for the other gamers, and just for GP chief we CFH one time on tiamat thats it lol,thats right we cfh on nid and every other hnm we claim and kill. we cfh once and that was a mistake but that makes us a shitty ls? once again champ trial and error, you learn by mistakes. dont hate us cause we respect the other players, grow up scum and go play in the sun. btw we killed tiamat with no problems the second time, trial and error champ trial and error. whoopy do you killed DL and all ground if we had a bazillian players in our ls we could do that too, still does not make you number one. get a clue!Originally Posted by Makaveli
and i did not hate HP i had alot of resect for the old HP (the new one blows), but they respected other players and didnt camp on top of tanks or steal hnm. you guys are scum plain and simply put period!
everytime i step away i think of something else so here is edit #2 hmm we kill every faf we get within 15mins or so give or take a few and i have yet to be there for a nid (i have a life outside of this game) but i know for a fact it takes us like 30-40mins or so to kill that too but we just about wipe to everything we claim god your a simple minded rere. Makaveli >> reee i'm the water boy reeee....
just being out claimed on other hnm makes us shitty i guess too... keep it up shit face i will just keep it coming maybe you will get a clue, sport.
oh yeah, you talk about others being on your dicks. well you are just the same with every rude comment or bashing you make of others. so basically you are on every other ls's nuts just makes you just as guilty, chump.
Originally Posted by Fira
Ahh yeah, Fira look at the number of post this person has made, and look at the cheesy ass sig, this isnt prawn. I guess I figured people would be smart enough to see this isnt from us. So yeah, gg to the asshole who made this bullshit post.
Found this on Alla about me from some newb.
ok so its a joke but at least its englishThis letter is not intended to assuage your worst fears about Xavier but will, in most cases, confirm them. Here's my side of the story: Name-calling and a general lack of respect for the opinions of others are a clear indication of insecurity. Of that I am certain, because Xavier recently went through an animalism phase in which he tried repeatedly to deliver an additional blow to dignity and self-worth. In fact, I'm not convinced that this phase of his has entirely passed. My evidence is that if one accepts the framework I've laid out here, it follows that Xavier's claim that laws are meant to be broken is not only an attack on the concept of objectivity, but an assault on the human mind. In order to solve the big problems with Xavier, we must first understand these problems, and to understand them, we must find the common ground that enables others to tell you things that he doesn't want you to know. His flimflams are not pedantic treatises expressing theories or extravaganzas dealing in fables or fancies. They are substantial, sober outpourings from the very soul of barbarism. In the end, the most telling thing is that Xavier spouts a lot of numbers whenever he wants to make a point. He then subjectively interprets those numbers to support his initiatives while ignoring the fact that it is easy to see faults in others. But it takes perseverance to reveal the truth about his remarks. In hearing about his deeds, one gets the distinct impression that he has stated that the only way to expand one's mind is with drugs -- or maybe even chocolate. That's just pure narcissism. Well, in Xavier's case, it might be pure ignorance, seeing that you'd think that someone would have done something by now to thwart Xavier's plans to descend to character assassination and name calling. Unfortunately, most people are quite happy to "go along to get along" and are rather reluctant to straighten out his thinking. It is imperative that we inform such people that Xavier gives new meaning to the word "peremptory". I know you're wondering why I just wrote that. I'll explain shortly, but first, I should state that I'm willing to accept that on theoretical grounds alone, Xavier's statements are so filled with errors that I feel some futility in replying to them. I'm even willing to accept that it is important to realize that he has a blatant disregard for society's basic laws. But he should clarify his point so people like you and me can tell what the heck he's talking about. Without clarification, his subliminal psywar campaigns sound lofty and include some emotionally charged words but don't really seem to make any sense.
My vision that some day, people everywhere will lay out some ideas and interpretations that hold the potential for insight is an inspiring dream. Unfortunately, reality always awakens me and reminds me that diabolism has served as the justification for the butchering, torture, and enslavement of more people than any other "ism". That's why it's Xavier's favorite; it makes it easy for him to tell everyone else what to do.
I disagree with Xavier's ultra-tendentious tirades. Now, I could go off on that point alone, but he may encourage men to leave their wives, kill their children, practice witchcraft, destroy capitalism, and become irrational sandbaggers right after he reads this letter. Let him. In a lustrum or two, I will open minds instead of closing them. I don't mean to scare you, but when Xavier was first found trying to take rights away from individuals on the basis of prejudice, myth, irrational belief, inaccurate information, and outright falsehood, I was scared. I was scared not only for my personal safety; I was scared for the people I love. And now that Xavier is planning to crush people to the earth and then claim the right to trample on them forever because they are prostrate, I'm downright terrified. He constantly insists that society is screaming for his opuscula. But he contradicts himself when he says that he is a martyr for freedom and a victim of allotheism. Unlike Xavier's cock-and-bull stories, my own invectives are not vague and undefined. And let us not forget that Xavier insists that his crusades are Holy Writ. Sorry, Xavier, but, with apologies to Gershwin, "it ain't necessarily so."
It would be good for the press to start paying attention to things like this. But let's not lose perspective. Xavier thinks I'm trying to say that his coalition is looking out for our best interests. Wait! I just heard something. Oh, never mind; it's just the sound of the point zooming way over Xavier's head. To pick an obvious, but often overlooked, example, there is more than a mite of palaver in his declamations. End of story. Actually, I should add that the next time he decides to trick our children into adopting unconventional, disapproved-of opinions and ways of life, he should think to himself, cui bono? -- who benefits? I am not going to go into too great a detail about snippy nonentities, but be assured that our battle with Xavier is a battle between spiritualism and Marxism, between tradition and subversion, between the defenders of Western civilization and its enemies. With the battle lines drawn as such, it is abundantly clear that the problem with Xavier is not that he's bestial. It's that he wants to crush the will of all individuals who have expressed political and intellectual opposition to his monographs.
Even so, there will be public outrage if Xavier tries to turn peaceful gatherings into embarrassing scandals. We can therefore extrapolate that his pranks are as predictable as sunrise. Whenever I advocate concrete action and specific quantifiable goals, Xavier's invariant response is to test another formula for silencing serious opposition. My purpose here is not to help young people develop the ability to make informed and reasoned decisions for the public good as citizens of a culturally diverse, democratic society in an interdependent world. Well, okay, it is. But I should point out that I have frequently criticized his unspoken plan to destroy the values, methods, and goals of traditional humanistic study. He usually addresses my criticisms by accusing me of isolationism, revisionism, child molestation, and halitosis. Xavier hopes that by delegitimizing me this way, no one will listen to me when I say that I must admit that I've read only a small fraction of Xavier's writings. (As a well-known aphorism states, it is not necessary to eat all of an apple to learn that it is rotten.) Nevertheless, I've read enough of Xavier's writings to know that Xavier is extremely vexatious. In fact, let's see what my handy-dandy Vexatious-O-Meter has to say about him. Whoa! The needle is off the scale! It's a good thing I checked, because if you can make any sense out Xavier's spineless squibs, then you must have gotten higher marks in school than I did. So who's crazy? I, or all the evil apostates who contend that merit is adequately measured by Xavier's methods and qualifications? Before you answer, let me point out that Xavier claims that his wisecracks are a breath of fresh air amid our modern culture's toxic cloud of chaos. I assert that the absurdities within that claim speak for themselves, although I should add that Xavier writes a lot of long statements that mean practically nothing. What's sneaky is that he constructs those statements in such a way that it never occurs to his readers to analyze them. Analysis would almost certainly indicate that Xavier sometimes uses the word "lithochromatographic" when describing his publications. Beware! This is a buzzword designed for emotional response.
Xavier's favorite tactic is known as "deceiving with the truth". The idea behind this tactic is that he wins our trust by revealing the truth but leaving some of it out. This makes us less likely to help people see Xavier's poxy lamentations for what they are. If Xavier is going to take the focus off the real issues, then he should at least have the self-respect to remind himself of a few things: First, all of his circulars are paralogistic. And second, if we don't stand uncompromised in a world that's on the brink of Xavier-induced disaster right now, then Xavier's insinuations will soon start to metastasize until they concoct labels for people, objects, and behaviors in order to manipulate the public's opinion of them. His ideological colors may have changed over the years. Nevertheless, Xavier's core principle has remained the same: to con us into believing that he knows 100% of everything 100% of the time. If you don't believe me, then note that even Xavier's proxies are afraid that Xavier will cure the evil of discrimination with more discrimination faster than you can say "unextinguishableness". I have seen their fear manifested over and over again, and it is further evidence that if Xavier truly wanted to be helpful, he wouldn't place mingy scamps at the top of the social hierarchy.
Even if one isn't completely conversant with current events, the evidence overwhelmingly indicates that if I wanted to brainwash and manipulate a large segment of the population, I would convince them that going through the motions of working is the same as working. In fact, that's exactly what Xavier does as part of his quest to show a clear lack of respect not just for those brave souls who fought and died for what they believed in, but also for you, the readers of this letter. It's possible that he doesn't realize this because he has been ingrained with so much of demagogism's propaganda. If that's the case, I recommend that we provide a trenchant analysis of his put-downs. Xavier likes to quote all of the saccharine, sticky moralisms about "human rights" and the evils of terrorism. But as soon as we stop paying attention, he invariably instructs his secret police to gain a respectable foothold for his self-aggrandizing ploys. Then, when someone notices, the pattern repeats from the beginning. Though this game may seem perverse beyond belief to any sane individual, it makes perfect sense in light of Xavier's illogical, illiberal theatrics. He has nephelococcygic delusions about being able to put daft thoughts in our children's minds. Now, that last statement is a bit of an oversimplification, an overgeneralization. But it is nevertheless substantially true.
Even though Xavier presents a public face that avoids overt wowserism, one of his helpers once said, "Granting Xavier complete control over our lives is as important as breathing air." Now that's pretty funny, of course, but I didn't include that quote just to make you laugh. I included it to convince you that justice isn't served when Xavier's crimes go unpunished. He vehemently denies that, of course. But he obviously would, because we have a dilemma of leviathan proportions on our hands: Should we stop the Huns at the gate, or is it sufficient to challenge him to defend his objectives or else to change them? Here's the answer, albeit in a somewhat circuitous and roundabout style: If you're the type who dares to think for yourself, then you've probably already determined that he wants to exploit other cultures for self-entertainment. You know what groups have historically wanted to do the same thing? Fascists and Nazis. While we all despair over Xavier's refractory, violent exegeses, we must also remember the principles that will guide our better behaviors and higher aspirations. On a lighter note, Xavier will probably respond to this letter just like he responds to all criticism. He will put me down as "jealous" or "capricious". That's his standard answer to everyone who says or writes anything about him except the most fawning praise.
What Xavier does in private is none of my business. But when he tries to spoon-feed us his pabulum, I object. All right, enough of that. Now let's talk about something else. Let's talk about how you may have noticed that he has a vested interest in making me languish along beneath the thousand eyes of incoherent, stinking thugs. But you don't know the half of it. For starters, Xavier's apparatchiks form an inerudite organization devoted to harassment and barratry. Am I being too harsh for writing that? Maybe I am, but that's really the only way you can push a point through to Xavier. If one believes statements like, "There's no difference between normal people like you and me and disgraceful, unscrupulous Luddites," one is, in effect, supporting infantile twaddlers. Xavier's suggestions are based on a technique I'm sure you've heard of. It's called "lying".
Xavier is not just misguided. He is unbelievably, astronomically misguided. The truth hurts, doesn't it, Xavier? If we take his campaigns to their logical conclusion, we see that sooner or later, he will keep essential documents hidden from the public until they become politically moot. I frequently talk about how his standard operating procedure is to destroy the lives of good, honest people. I would drop the subject, except that many people are incredulous when I tell them that he intends to discredit and intimidate the opposition. "How could Xavier be so gutless?", they ask me. "It doesn't seem possible." Well, it is honestly possible, and now I'll explain exactly how Xavier plans to do it. But first, you need to realize that if you ever ask him to do something, you can bet that your request will get lost in the shuffle, unaddressed, ignored, and rebuffed. You are, I'm sure, well aware that in this volatile political moment, we must cautiously guard against the dangers of morally questionable, ignominious solecism. But did you know that this is nothing new? The practical struggle which now begins, sketched in broad outlines, takes the following course: We can never return to the past. And if we are ever to move forward to the future, we have to provide people the wherewithal to criticize Xavier's shell games publically for their formalistic categories, their spurious claims of neutrality, and their blindness to the abuse of private power. I could be wrong about any or all of this, but at the moment, the above fits what I know of history, people, and current conditions. If anyone sees anything wrong or has some new facts or theories on this, I'd love to hear about them.
omg pls summarize. D:
hmmm. interesting. my guess is he is a psycology major, or has alot of free time to look up big words ^^
What do rummy dipsomaniacs, the most vindictive misfits you'll ever see, and Mr. Jesus Christ have in common? If you answered, "They all waffle on all the issues," then pat yourself on the back. Before I say anything else, let me remind Jesus that I, hardheaded cynic that I am, hate it when people get their facts wrong. For instance, whenever I hear some corporate fat cat make noises about how the rules don't apply to Jesus, I can't help but think that Jesus's reason is not true reason. It does not seek the truth, but only nutty answers, perverted resolutions to conflicts. Thanks to Jesus, malignant saboteurs can now freely make a big deal out of nothing. Likewise, I am not a robot. I am a thinking, feeling, human being. As such, I get teary-eyed whenever I see Jesus waste natural resources. It makes me want to enhance people's curiosity, critical acumen, and aesthetic sensitivity, which is why I'm so eager to tell you that when Jesus was first found trying to canonize pusillanimous, benighted dopeheads as nomological emblems of propriety, I was scared. I was scared not only for my personal safety; I was scared for the people I love. And now that Jesus is planning to direct social activity toward philanthropic flimflam rather than toward the elimination of the basic deficiencies in the organization of our economic and cultural life, I'm indubitably downright terrified. If racism were an Olympic sport, he would clinch the gold medal.
Most pundits are uncertain about the magnitude of the threat posed by Jesus's positions. Or, to express that sentiment without all of the emotionally charged lingo, Jesus doesn't care about freedom, as he can neither eat it nor put it in the bank. It's just a word to him. If nothing else, all the deals he makes are strictly one-way. Jesus gets all the rights, and the other party gets all the obligations. Regardless of what he seems to insist, Jesus's contrivances are not modeled on democracy as envisaged by philosophers of the Enlightenment, but on the anti-democratic principles of antinomianism. He once tried to purge the land of every non-manipulative person, gene, idea, and influence. If you consider this an exception to the rule then you indeed don't understand how Jesus operates. I hope, however, that you at least understand that you may be wondering why the worst types of crafty-to-the-core blowhards I've ever seen latch onto his undertakings. It's because people of that nature need to have rhetoric and dogma to recite during times of stress in order to cope. That's also why if you look back over some of my older letters, you'll see that I predicted that Jesus would destroy our youths' ability to relax, reflect, study, and meditate. And, as I predicted, he did. But you know, that was not a difficult prediction to make. Anyone who has bothered to learn even a little about Jesus could have made the same prediction. Many people are shocked when I tell them that it is both frustrating and frightening to observe the extreme ignorance -- no, idiocy -- present in Jesus's ebullitions. And I'm shocked that so many people are shocked. You see, I had thought everybody already knew that some people say that that isn't sufficient evidence to prove that Jesus is secretly scheming to destroy that which is the envy of -- and model for -- the entire civilized world. And I must agree; one needs much more evidence than that. But the evidence is there, for anyone who isn't afraid to look at it. Just look at the way that he does not tolerate any view that differs from his own. Rather, Jesus discredits and discards those people who contradict him along with the ideas that they represent.
I've received a smattering of mail from people who want to know the real story behind Jesus's repressive squibs, so here it is: Jesus has for a long time been arguing that we should abandon the institutionalized and revered concept of democracy. Had he instead been arguing that he explicitly seeks out situations where his appalling behavior will be tolerated, condoned, and admired, I might cede him his point. As it stands, the leap of faith required to bridge the logical gap in Jesus's arguments is simply too terrifying for me to contemplate. What I do often contemplate, however, is how he wants nothing less than to curry favor with villainous vagrants using a barrage of flattery, especially recognition of their "value", their "importance", their "educational mission", and other pathetic nonsense. His minions then wonder, "What's wrong with that?" Well, there's not much to be done with macabre, pudibund incubi who can't figure out what's wrong with that, but the rest of us can plainly see that Jesus claims to have turned over a new leaf shortly after getting caught trying to redefine success and obscure failure. This claim is an outright lie that is still being circulated by Jesus's comrades. The truth is that I am certain that if I asked the next person I meet if he would want Jesus to allow federally funded research to mushroom into a raving, grossly inefficient system, hampered by temperamental recidivists and wanton degenerates, he would say no. Yet we all stand idly by while Jesus claims that granting him complete control over our lives is as important as breathing air. Jesus has never gotten ahead because of his hard work or innovative ideas. Rather, all of Jesus's successes are due to kickbacks, bribes, black market double-dealing, outright thuggery, and unsavory political intrigue. In hearing about his announcements, one gets the distinct impression that I, speaking as someone who is not a noisome, overweening fugitive, can hardly believe how in this day and age, sleazy yokels are allowed to control your bank account, your employment, your personal safety, and your mind. For proof of this fact, I must point out that he is not a responsible citizen. Responsible citizens make the world safe for democracy. Responsible citizens clearly do not topple society. Whenever someone tells Jesus not to extirpate the very things that I cherish, Jesus gets all teary-eyed. My, my; how sad. My heart bleeds for him, it really does.
Relative to just a few years ago, prolix utopians (especially the judgmental type) are nearly ten times as likely to believe that bad things "just happen" (i.e., they're not caused by Jesus himself). This is neither a coincidence nor simply a sign of the times. Rather, it reflects a sophisticated, psychological warfare program designed by Jesus to prevent the real problems from being solved. While it is reasonable to expect that I find his agendas to be a perversion of the truth, it remains that when he tells us that all major world powers are controlled by a covert group of "insiders", he somehow fails to mention that he always tries to rationalize his put-downs with compelling gobbledegook about some "greater good". He fails to mention that it is an actuarial certainty that he will promote the sort of behavior that would have made the folks in Sodom and Gomorrah blush in a lustrum or two. And he fails to mention that ancient Greek dramatists discerned a peculiar virtue in being tragic. Jesus would do well to realize that they never discerned any virtue in being mentally deficient. Given his current mind-set, he could use a heavy dose of sensitivity training. We can therefore extrapolate that if it weren't for neo-featherbrained fault-finders, he would have no friends.
If you think that Jesus's smears enhance performance standards, productivity, and competitiveness, then think again. Jesus rarely tells his yes-men that he plans to engage in an endless round of finger pointing. As long as I live, I will be shouting this truth from rooftops and doing everything I can to straighten out his thinking. The last time I told his spokesmen that I want to lend support to the thesis that there is another side to the issue, they declared in response, "But space gods arriving in flying saucers will save humanity from self-destruction." Of course, they didn't use exactly those words, but that's exactly what they meant. Almost without exception, Jesus somehow manages to get away with spreading lies (he is the way, the truth, and the light), distortions (cannibalism, wife-swapping, and the murder of infants and the elderly are acceptable behavior), and misplaced idealism (he's the best thing to come along since the invention of sliced bread). However, when I try to respond in kind, I get censored faster than you can say "contradistinctive". To bring the matter closer to home, let me remind you that he is like a giant octopus sprawling its slimy length over city, state, and nation. Like the octopus of real life, Jesus operates under cover of self-created screen. He seizes in his long and powerful tentacles our executive officers, our legislative bodies, our schools, our courts, our newspapers, and every agency created for the public protection. Many the things I've talked about in this letter are obvious. We all know they're true. But still it's necessary for us to say them, because Mr. Jesus Christ gets perfervid about unilateralism.
Thanks for that site.
Originally Posted by Xavier
Flarega gets it.
Thats my favorite part!Jesus somehow manages to get away with spreading lies (he is the way, the truth, and the light), distortions (cannibalism, wife-swapping, and the murder of infants and the elderly are acceptable behavior), and misplaced idealism (he's the best thing to come along since the invention of sliced bread).
Trash that can outclaim your botsAntimatter is trash![]()