We've all seen the flash movie. Now enter the DVD.

[Klever]

Because a small plane obviously carries the same amount of fuel as a commercial airplane heading across the country which has just taken off.

[quote:04c61]1 plane and 3 towers all destroyed in ways that had never happened previously in history?

"Hay guyz, Hiroshima wasn't destroyed by the atom bomb! It was just a conspiracy because a whole city could never have been blown up before!"

I guess you have to disregard all the phone calls made by passengers aboard the planes after they were hijacked too, right?[/quote:04c61]


The people on the planes coulds have still made those calls and died, but that doesn't mean that those planes destruction alone could have brought those towers down. It is really an engineering phenomenon to think that they even could.

[Fayth-]

so those of you who believe a plane hit the pentagon how do you explain the lack of damage to the ground infront of the pentagon? The plane was said to "bounce" off the ground.

Since the plane hit those light poles, how come they are not bend or damaged in the way that they should be?

How come there is not a plane in the video when the explosion happened with the pentagon?

how come 4 days before the plane hit the pentagon there was a white mark on the ground almost exacly in the same direction of what the plane hit

where is the debris (and dont feed me the bullshit that it vaporized upon impact)

why did the wings not make a SINGLE BIT OF DAMAGE when the plane went inside the building?

it all seems strange to me

Trying to keep the large images as links

http://www.apfn.org/apfn/car.jpg
http://www.clarkairbasek9.com/pent12.jpg
http://www.apfn.org/images/image.jpg
Looks kinda like a plane to me, /shrug
http://www.apfn.org/images/debris-77.jpg

the 757 body is 12 ft 4in wide and 13 ft 6in high
16 to 20 foot hole

Other plane debris found:
http://69.57.144.30/ats/pentagon757/rim1.jpg
http://69.57.144.30/ats/pentagon757/landinggear002.jpg
http://69.57.144.30/ats/pentagon757/trou1moyenne.jpg
http://69.57.144.30/ats/pentagon757/you ... idence.jpg
http://69.57.144.30/ats/pentagon757/aedrive5.jpg
http://69.57.144.30/ats/pentagon757/planeparts-1.jpg
http://69.57.144.30/ats/pentagon757/Damage9.jpg

Lot of good stuff here for those of you who only listen to one side of the story: http://www.abovetopsecret.com/pages/911 ... dence.html

Both sides are pretty convincing for me, but I am leaning towards the plane side

[Enkidu]

It is really an engineering phenomenon to think that they even could.

No it isn't... Popular Mechanics ran an article explaining in detail how the towers fell... The one physicist I know of that promotes the "couldn't be an airplane" theory is a nuclear physicist or something, nothing related to structural design. The physicist and experts used in the Popular Mechanics article were all experts in fields that actually pertain to the subject matter.

Next step: Popular Mechanics obviously are lying cause the government threatened their lives!

[Klever]

Did "Popular Mechanics" mention that it was the the first time ever in history that a building of that caliber was destroyed due to an internal fire? Seems like a weird coincidence that on 9/11 as well as terrorist attacks there are also fires that collapse buildings for the first time in history?

There was enough gas to basically melt the interior steel structure? Even if the top floors fell over how does that justify the building collapsing? Why were there numerous eye-witeness acounts from even NYC firefighters of explosions going off in the towers?

Just because popular mechanics decides to dedicate an issue on 9/11 doesn't mean they can answer questions of real merit. Even if the two towers fell to 2 planes alone (which they were designed to withstand) how does that explain what looks like a very controlled demolition of WTC building 7 hours that day?

If you base your entire arguement from what you read in a magazine, then your nieve. I've gone the extra step and actually ready the FEMA reports explaining the damage and why building 7 fell, and it's really ludicris.

[Tyche]

HAY GUYS LETS WATCH MICHAEL MOORE STORIE....I MEAN DOCUMENTARIES

[Klever]

Michael Moore is too much of a fat pussy to talk about what were talking about here.

[Unklemonkey]

http://www.theorderls.com/phpBB2/viewto ... sc&start=0

I'm sorry klever, anything you say is void

[Klever]

You know it doesn't suprise me you dodge any of the topics being brought up and instead attack my charectar. You must be a walking vagina.