In answer to the OP.. I'd have to say that depends on whether you are in a relationship or if it was a drunken one night stand with someone you'll never see again.
In answer to the OP.. I'd have to say that depends on whether you are in a relationship or if it was a drunken one night stand with someone you'll never see again.
This is probably a broken awnser but it is a possibility...
The guy sees the chic nude so his body reacts to it by his dick going erect but Him the guy not the body says no but the body is still reacting to the touch and the sight of the nude chic is still causing his body to react to it.
In Virginia, a man cannot be raped by a woman. I kid you not, all sex is automatically consentual if you are a male in Virginia.Originally Posted by Kiro
You see, in this country, all people are treated equally. Except for minorities, they get benefits because white people were real mean to them back in the day. Both genders are treated equally. Except women get benefits because they couldn't vote at some point.
I'm gonna go back in time and historically screw white males over, it should even things out.
The sad plight of straight, white men, if only there was a place where their opinions still mattered.Originally Posted by Parshias
Oh wait... The Congress, the White House, the Supreme Court, and the board room of nearly every Fortune 500 company.
Seriously, your turtle fails. There are tons of stupid, old laws on the books- it takes law makers years to catch up to the times. (Hell, it is still legal in most places to video tape people without their consent as long as they are not audio taped.) The problem is that a bunch of rich, straight, white men in power do not feel that a man getting raped by a woman is illegal because the men should like it. But I guess it is the fault of minorities and women that straight, white men don't like getting raped by women.
date rape drug + viagra
counter this by reminding everyone that women have a period once a month as payment.Originally Posted by Parshias
I don't like the argument that just because it takes two to make a baby, the guy has equal say in the deal. Hes not the one carrying the baby the next 9 months, and doesn't have to deal with all of the emotional rollercoster that the development casues.
9 months of emotional rollercoaster vs. 18 years of financial ruin for a man who cannot afford to raise a child. Ever felt what kind of emotional rollercoaster a guy goes through that /barely/ scrapes by to pay his bills? /devilsadvocate offOriginally Posted by Xavier
Interesting discussion.
so do you think its ok after 17 years of hiding a child from the father that the mother can back charge him with 17 years of child support payments? yes she carried the baby but it really did take 2 to make. besides a little humor, the men had to put up with the emo swings for 9 months lol.Originally Posted by Xavier
Yes, 18 years of financial ruin for the man. Because we know that the mother isn't going to put a dime into raising the child...Originally Posted by Ricardon
That wasn't the point at all. Actually, your argument helps to back up my feelings on the issue. It's the responsibility of both sides. The man/woman both have equal responsibility (in a perfect world) in conception of the child, and in raising the child. Given these facts, why then would it be unreasonable to argue that both should not have a say in whether or not the child is aborted/born? I just think that the "well, the man doesnt have to carry/give birth to the child" argument is a little weak is all.Originally Posted by Septimus
When they can transfer a pregnancy to the father and he can go through the pregnancy, then the father can have a say on the abortion issue. Until then, there are too many deadbeat dads out there who shirk their responsibility, not o mention control freaks who would force their abused wives/girlfriends to have the baby just so he could torment her for the rest of her life.Originally Posted by Ricardon
How exactly is the man going to have an equal and/or greater say than the woman? She can sneak away to get the procedure done without telling him, and she can tell the doctor inside the exam room once the man is out of the picture that she is being coerced or doesn't want to go through with it anymore, but the only thing a man can do to get final say is to drug the woman and find a clinic that will actually perform the procedure on someone who shows up unconscious, and that is not likely to get far. By physical necessity the woman has final say. In a perfect world there would be an agreement or compromise though.
On a related note, I heard a story of a man who was refusing to pay child support to his ex-girlfriend, who he'd never actually had full sex with... she was a total nutjob and actually impregnated herself on purpose with his semen after failing to swallow it. I don't know how the case turned out.
The hell?Originally Posted by Krylanna
She spit it out and put it up there with her fingers in an apparently successful attempt to impregnate herself.
But what we must remeber is that the rape doesn't have to be physical... ^^ Plenty of women mentally rape guys into shitty situations just cause they feel a certain way.![]()