HELLO, THIS IS A CHOOSE YOUR OWN ADVENTURE POST. IF YOU'D LIKE TO ENGAGE IN MEANINGFUL, ALBEIT AT THIS POINT CONDENSCENDING, DISCUSSION ABOUT THE SEA, SKY, KINGS COMPARISON, TURN TO PAGE 1. IF YOU'D LIKE TO HAVE YOUR OWN SHITTY ARGUING SKILLS THROWN BACK IN YOUR FACE TO EXHIBIT HOW IT PROVES NOTHING AND ISN'T WORTH A SHIT, TURN TO PAGE 2.
PAGE 1-
Am I cheerleader or something? Is this like a Lakers-Kings rivalry? I'd have to concede? Get your head out of your ass.
Sea is like Sky in that're zones unlocked by missions and they have popped NMs. That's it. That's where the comparison ends. I know, I know, there there, you really wanted the comparison to go on, but guess what- SE didn't. They heard people complaining about Kings and how they were botted, and they
still thought the gear from them should be rare. So the next time they wanted to make rare gear, they decided to do through difficult missions and low drop rates. Viola! Now the gear is just as rare, but the players don't have botting JPs who hold Fafnir for 6 hours to get the window in Tokyo time to blame, they only have their lazy selves! What an ingenius solution!
But we have Septimus over here:
No! I don't want the gear to be rare! I don't want it to be in Sea, I want Sea to be comparable to Sky, even though it's not!
PAGE 2-
Stop comparing sea to sky- they are two very different activities. Compare sea to kings. Oh, but then you will have to concede that kings is a failure.