Tiamat...

[Paladinh]

you're fucking stupid

EVENT ONE we claimed when zigma's alliance (thus zigma) had no hate.

EVENT TWO then, he provoked and got hate, but not enough to get the claim. belkin's flash + shield bash did get hate, so we got the claim.

also, zigma had to have wiped to have no hate; we win? i think so.

Markup is mine.

Sounds like you're accusing Zigma of stealing off you.

Never said that, you did. New claiming systems is all we got to say. Don't know what happened but when zigma voke, he didn't have hate. We flashed and we got it.

[pepitonet]

I would have accepted defeat if my linkshell would have wiped. I know what my linkshell is capable of and It was surely not the end. No screenshot can justify what you did.

you sure? I mean it looks pretty cut and dry.

everyone died, 2 ppl reraised, mob is 100% and unclaimed, all of you who say this mob was stolen are pretty patheticly sad examples of dead brains or unforgivable retarted players.

what does it take so we can say they have wiped? wait until they HP or try and fail a few times or call and see if they can get all their members online ?

please explain what wiping means so we "don't" break the rules again.

[Zigma]

wow, brick wall man, brick wall.

[aurik]

er aurik, they were two seperate points, not chronological.

Why did you conjoin them with "then"?

BTW, page 14 for the glory of Atomos. Check out my new Location tag bitches!

[copgary]

er aurik, they were two seperate points, not chronological.

Why did you conjoin them with "then"?

BTW, page 14 for the glory of Atomos. Check out my new Location tag bitches!

you got me, i goofed with my typing. SORRY

[Gregorio]

Several people in my alliance still had hate and tiamat was getting ready to draw them in 1 by 1. You see it go yellow and immediately go in and try to flash it,

Look at the video. If there was 0 hate from my alliance, tiamat would have turned claim over to you and not stay yellow. You would not have had to do a shield bash (like you said) to get 100% claim.

Exactly. If it was totally unaggroed, there should only be 1 action to claiming but there were an obvious 4, so Zigma had hate.

*BUZZ* Wrong!

How is that wrong? I've never dia/elegy/whatever'd a completely unclaimed mob and it stay yellow. I've never seen people have to voke Fafnir 2 or 3 times to get claim. If it was completely unclaimed and had no hate list, then the first person to take some type of action would have gotten the claim.

[Rexeves]

IF Zigma didn't have hate, then it shouldn't of taken all 3 of a STUN FLASH AND SHIELD BASH to get total claim.

[copgary]

Several people in my alliance still had hate and tiamat was getting ready to draw them in 1 by 1. You see it go yellow and immediately go in and try to flash it,

Look at the video. If there was 0 hate from my alliance, tiamat would have turned claim over to you and not stay yellow. You would not have had to do a shield bash (like you said) to get 100% claim.

Exactly. If it was totally unaggroed, there should only be 1 action to claiming but there were an obvious 4, so Zigma had hate.

*BUZZ* Wrong!

How is that wrong? I've never dia/elegy/whatever'd a completely unclaimed mob and it stay yellow. I've never seen people have to voke Fafnir 2 or 3 times to get claim. If it was completely unclaimed and had no hate list, then the first person to take some type of action would have gotten the claim.

FOR FUCK'S SAKE, READ THE NEW GOD DAMN UPDATE. YOU'RE FUCKING DUMB.

fuck you pedo

[Paladinh]

Several people in my alliance still had hate and tiamat was getting ready to draw them in 1 by 1. You see it go yellow and immediately go in and try to flash it,

Look at the video. If there was 0 hate from my alliance, tiamat would have turned claim over to you and not stay yellow. You would not have had to do a shield bash (like you said) to get 100% claim.

Exactly. If it was totally unaggroed, there should only be 1 action to claiming but there were an obvious 4, so Zigma had hate.

*BUZZ* Wrong!

How is that wrong? I've never dia/elegy/whatever'd a completely unclaimed mob and it stay yellow. I've never seen people have to voke Fafnir 2 or 3 times to get claim. If it was completely unclaimed and had no hate list, then the first person to take some type of action would have gotten the claim.

I have. Unless you have someone to corroborate your story... I do.. his names Dinh LAWL

[Rexeves]

Several people in my alliance still had hate and tiamat was getting ready to draw them in 1 by 1. You see it go yellow and immediately go in and try to flash it,

Look at the video. If there was 0 hate from my alliance, tiamat would have turned claim over to you and not stay yellow. You would not have had to do a shield bash (like you said) to get 100% claim.

Exactly. If it was totally unaggroed, there should only be 1 action to claiming but there were an obvious 4, so Zigma had hate.

*BUZZ* Wrong!

How is that wrong? I've never dia/elegy/whatever'd a completely unclaimed mob and it stay yellow. I've never seen people have to voke Fafnir 2 or 3 times to get claim. If it was completely unclaimed and had no hate list, then the first person to take some type of action would have gotten the claim.

Thank you. Jesus these morons don't seem to understand claiming system. Lets go back to valkurm to test it all over again.

[aurik]

er aurik, they were two seperate points, not chronological.

Why did you conjoin them with "then"?

BTW, page 14 for the glory of Atomos. Check out my new Location tag bitches!

you got me, i goofed with my typing. SORRY

Well I'm just saying, you make it quite clear that you claimed tiamat when zigma had no hate, and then zigma provoked it off you guys and generated hate. Then when people contest this, you say "oh sorry sorry, that's not what happened, TYPO"

Honestly, you need to pick one story and stick with it.

Page 15 for Atomos. We have Defoliate Leshy over here too.

[Rexeves]

Take your own damn advice copgary. RTFM

[Dinh]

I corroborate with Paladinh, I've seen it to.

[Gregorio]

Several people in my alliance still had hate and tiamat was getting ready to draw them in 1 by 1. You see it go yellow and immediately go in and try to flash it,

Look at the video. If there was 0 hate from my alliance, tiamat would have turned claim over to you and not stay yellow. You would not have had to do a shield bash (like you said) to get 100% claim.

Exactly. If it was totally unaggroed, there should only be 1 action to claiming but there were an obvious 4, so Zigma had hate.

*BUZZ* Wrong!

How is that wrong? I've never dia/elegy/whatever'd a completely unclaimed mob and it stay yellow. I've never seen people have to voke Fafnir 2 or 3 times to get claim. If it was completely unclaimed and had no hate list, then the first person to take some type of action would have gotten the claim.

FOR FUCK'S SAKE, READ THE NEW GOD DAMN UPDATE. YOU'RE FUCKING DUMB.

fuck you pedo

I'M fucking dumb? Go out and cast dia, flash, provoke, ANYTHING IN THE FUCKING GAME. I guarantee it'll go red to you.

If Zigma had absolutely NO HATE, and Tiamat had NO LATE LIST, then Tiamat would have immeditally gone red.

[copgary]

did you not see tryon stun it?

i thought you read the actual posts before posting... but you just ramble on like a dumbass.

aurik, i already apologized for making that mistake. accept it, deal with it. you saw the screen shots and you're big enough to decipher what you will from it. i told you what everyone else was saying.

TRYON+ZIGMA = two different people fighting for claim...you piece of shit. you're not even in a legitimate HNMls to talk about multi-person claiming.

[Skyylya]

I was in Yuhtunga on my rdm. I cast slow on a goblin, it starts attacking me but remained yellow. I had to cast a 2nd spell for it to become claimed to me even though i already had hate.

Go test the new system yourself.

[Rexeves]

did you not see tryon stun it?

i thought you read the actual posts before posting... but you just ramble on like a dumbass.

aurik, i already apologized for making that mistake. accept it, deal with it. you saw the screen shots and you're big enough to decipher what you will from it. i told you what everyone else was saying.

If Tryon stunned it, like you claim he did, then on that pic we should see the "Cannot attack target" crap.

KTHXBAI

[Dinh]

er aurik, they were two seperate points, not chronological.

Why did you conjoin them with "then"?

BTW, page 14 for the glory of Atomos. Check out my new Location tag bitches!

you got me, i goofed with my typing. SORRY

Well I'm just saying, you make it quite clear that you claimed tiamat when zigma had no hate, and then zigma provoked it off you guys and generated hate. Then when people contest this, you say "oh sorry sorry, that's not what happened, TYPO"

Honestly, you need to pick one story and stick with it.

Page 15 for Atomos. We have Defoliate Leshy over here too.

Well it is within my original analysis that the events that transpired occured with the locale of a different type. Although one may attest to the validity of the events in question, your immediate present within or around the area would be needed to truly comprehend the said experience. Since you hail from a world of an undiscovered country, any state or argument herein pertaining to you or your fellow uncoth accomplaces are considered null and void. SEE I CAN USE BIG WORDS TO TWIST THINGS AROUND TOO!!

[Dinh]

I was in Yuhtunga on my rdm. I cast slow on a goblin, it starts attacking me but remained yellow. I had to cast a 2nd spell for it to become claimed to me even though i already had hate.

Go test the new system yourself.

YAY now we got three! Dinh, Skyylya and Paladinh!

[copgary]

did you not see tryon stun it?

i thought you read the actual posts before posting... but you just ramble on like a dumbass.

aurik, i already apologized for making that mistake. accept it, deal with it. you saw the screen shots and you're big enough to decipher what you will from it. i told you what everyone else was saying.

If Tryon stunned it, like you claim he did, then on that pic we should see the "Cannot attack target" crap.

KTHXBAI

YUP you're right! i'm leaving now because he's right... and when he's right, he's right...

dear bgfourms,
think whatever you want tonight boys.
<3 copgary