E3 Nintendo Discussion Thread

[Anyway]

How could you honestly say FF4 sucked? Did you play it? It was frigging amazing. Cecil and Kain > Gay ass Link playing his flute. I also forgot, Zelda on SNES is also better than Ocarina. Ocarina is the best N64 game, that's about it.

Also fyi, I've gone through FF4 and 6 around 5 times each. That number will grow!

[Dezzimal]

How could you honestly say FF4 sucked? Did you play it? It was frigging amazing. Cecil and Kain > Gay ass Link playing his flute. I also forgot, Zelda on SNES is also better than Ocarina. Ocarina is the best N64 game, that's about it.

Also fyi, I've gone through FF4 and 6 around 5 times each. That number will grow!

Smash Bros and Super Mario 64 were as good if not better than Zelda 64. We're crossing genere lines here but I personally believe Smash Bros was the best followed by zelda then mario. The replayability of smash bros outweighs the well polished story with zelda.

[Lordwafik]

How could you honestly say FF4 sucked? Did you play it? It was frigging amazing. Cecil and Kain > Gay ass Link playing his flute. I also forgot, Zelda on SNES is also better than Ocarina. Ocarina is the best N64 game, that's about it.

Also fyi, I've gone through FF4 and 6 around 5 times each. That number will grow!

I did play it. lol @ link being gay, did or did you not see edward and his pussy moves. FF4 is b o r i n g. I'm up to that part with the metal dungeon or whatever, where you cant equip metallic items. It's not really fun. Everyone has 4 HP and you run out of MP fast. I'd much rather LoZ than that boring game. I had tons more fun in FF8 than FF4.

[Celeras]

I didnt like Zenogears :/

Good thing it was Xenogears...and its the best RPG ever made.

That title is reserved for Chrono Trigger, good sir.

[edgarfigaro]

I didnt like Zenogears :/

Good thing it was Xenogears...and its the best RPG ever made.

That title is reserved for Chrono Trigger, good sir.

FF6 is clearly the best, and anyone that says otherwise fucking sucks.

Xenogears maybe good...I dunno, because Xenosaga destroyed any urge I ever had for playing gears.

And ROFL at the person trying to claim that FFIV is better than OoT. I like FFIV, it's my second favorite FF (third if you count Tactics as a FF), but there's no way it comes close to being the game OoT is.

OoT and Mario 64 are hands down my top two games ever. There should not be much discussion on this subject (the only two games you can argue about are Tetris and Super Mario World). There's yet to be a better 3D platformer than Mario, and that game defined the era. And OoT was amazing, a great story and extremely excellent gameplay. You give me a choice of 2 games to play for the rest of my life, and it's those two.

[Anyway]

How could you honestly say FF4 sucked? Did you play it? It was frigging amazing. Cecil and Kain > Gay ass Link playing his flute. I also forgot, Zelda on SNES is also better than Ocarina. Ocarina is the best N64 game, that's about it.

Also fyi, I've gone through FF4 and 6 around 5 times each. That number will grow!

I did play it. lol @ link being gay, did or did you not see edward and his pussy moves. FF4 is b o r i n g. I'm up to that part with the metal dungeon or whatever, where you cant equip metallic items. It's not really fun. Everyone has 4 HP and you run out of MP fast. I'd much rather LoZ than that boring game. I had tons more fun in FF8 than FF4.

Not my fault you don't like it because it's apparently difficult for you... OoT can be beaten by a 6 year old.

[Lordwafik]

it's not the difficulty that kept me from the game, it's the boredom, and the fact that every fight felt like i was fighting a HNM, maybe im underlevelled for the areas /shrug, dont know, dont care, FF4 is poo in comparison to OoT.

Where's a 6 year old who's beat OoT without a strat guide? I'd like to shake his hand.

[Lbelle]

it's not the difficulty that kept me from the game, it's the boredom, and the fact that every fight felt like i was fighting a HNM, maybe im underlevelled for the areas /shrug, dont know, dont care, FF4 is poo in comparison to OoT.

Where's a 6 year old who's beat OoT without a strat guide? I'd like to shake his hand.

Well my brother is five, and he beat it with little help from me and my dad. But he can play through lots of the game without help now actually

edit ::

Can we get this thread off derail now btw? More E-3izzle pleeeeaseeee

[Anyway]

it's not the difficulty that kept me from the game, it's the boredom, and the fact that every fight felt like i was fighting a HNM, maybe im underlevelled for the areas /shrug, dont know, dont care, FF4 is poo in comparison to OoT.

Where's a 6 year old who's beat OoT without a strat guide? I'd like to shake his hand.

Yea, my brother did it when he was 7. And my cousin did it when he was 6.(Though he also beat RE: 4 so he may just be good.)

[Iku]

Hmm, people play PC game because of their superior graphic. So if PS3 offer good graphic they may draw PC gamers to their console consider gaming desktop nowadays cost a tons.

Also, PS2 fanbase > Xbox fanbase + Nintendo fanbase.


I couldnt pay 300 bucks for PS2 like 3 years ago. But i am pretty sure i can pay 600 bucks for PS3 because i worked for the last 2 years. Gamer is human and human grows up.

And i will buy PS3 because they have great titles, online support, and Blue Ray technology ( space saver).



Nintendo's Wii is really impressive idea. However, i am not impressed because i am lazy. Why the hell do i want to stand up and swing the controller like a maniac in front of the TV? Did you even consider multiplayer which you will bump into each other and potentiall swing your fists to your friends' faces? Plus, no online support? No DVD or whatever?


Nintendo phails.

[JoOeetheplatypuS]

Hmm, people play PC game because of their superior graphic. So if PS3 offer good graphic they may draw PC gamers to their console consider gaming desktop nowadays cost a tons

No they flock to PC because of graphics, customizability, keyboard/mouse controls, mods, the type of game that gets made on PC, misguided fanaticism, etc.

Also, PS2 fanbase > Xbox fanbase + Nintendo fanbase.


I couldnt pay 300 bucks for PS2 like 3 years ago. But i am pretty sure i can pay 600 bucks for PS3 because i worked for the last 2 years. Gamer is human and human grows up.

And i will buy PS3 because they have great titles, online support, and Blue Ray technology ( space saver).

And you want to pay 600 for it instead of buying more games? Just because you can pay for something doesn't mean its worth it. The 'fanbase' is overexagerrated, most PS2 'fans' are just people who bought the system and enjoyed it but couldnt care less about sony.

lol the inconvienience of disc switching and the 'space' a disc takes up is not worth 200 extra bucks.

Nintendo's Wii is really impressive idea. However, i am not impressed because i am lazy. Why the hell do i want to stand up and swing the controller like a maniac in front of the TV? Did you even consider multiplayer which you will bump into each other and potentiall swing your fists to your friends' faces? Plus, no online support? No DVD or whatever?

You obviously havent followed it at ALL and made a snap judgement. There will be online support. There will be a DVD playback feature. You don't need to stand up, subtle moves work just as well. Multiplayer is fine since you don't need to stand up.

I phail.

fixed

[edgarfigaro]

the huge majority of PS2s were sold to the non hardcore demographic...the ones that by definition aren't fanboys. They just bought it because of the games.

These are also the type of people that more likely than not won't pay $600 for a gaming console. So I don't know why sony's launching at that price point. You'd think they'd know better, especially seeing that they crushed Sega by undercutting Saturn's price from the getgo.

Moral of the story: most casual gamers aren't going to pay a $300 premium for a game console.

[Elemmire]

I think the 2 things I'm most excited from seeing from E3...

GOTHIC 3 AND SPORE WHOO YA!

[Raivyn]

the huge majority of PS2s were sold to the non hardcore demographic...the ones that by definition aren't fanboys. They just bought it because of the games.

These are also the type of people that more likely than not won't pay $600 for a gaming console. So I don't know why sony's launching at that price point. You'd think they'd know better, especially seeing that they crushed Sega by undercutting Saturn's price from the getgo.

Moral of the story: most casual gamers aren't going to pay a $300 premium for a game console.

honestly, I'm just going to buy a fucking PC.

I was thinking of maybe purchasing a next gen console... but fuck that. PCs are upgradeable, multipurpose, and can play most of the better games. This may be the cycle that I just don't buy a single god damn console. Maybe, instead of costing me 200 bucks, sony is actually saving me 200 bucks when I go to purchase a new PC this year

[Elemmire]

Computers indeed ftw