i dunno... the theory? or maybe the book? lolOriginally Posted by Tyr
i dunno... the theory? or maybe the book? lolOriginally Posted by Tyr
Logic is not a means to an end. Whether or not we "exist" or if the world is "real" is a red herring. Existance is infallable as a concept because without it all other explanations fall apart, including logic. Admiting existance is basically admiting the possibility of God.Originally Posted by Bwelch
On the other side of that, existance is an explanation, not a rule. It is fallable because most people accept that mankind does not have the capacity to understand and fully explain the universe.
The question is which side do you take. Does existance exist? Is it possible for existance to not exist? Does it even matter?
According to string theory, yeah.Originally Posted by shihei
It's really just taking shrodingers cat to the extreme, you could easily make a case for 11, 12, ..., infinite dimensions if you really wanted to, you'd just have to conceive of something bigger then a universe. (something "outside" of the universe)
Quantum physics is really hard to learn and impossible to understand, it's sorta like seeing a white ball in front of you and someone coming along and saying "no, that's a blue square, idiot."
Originally Posted by GRT
sarcasm my good man!
Humans are capable of being psychic, duh...don't you / didn't you watch Psych? (Good show btw.)Originally Posted by untouchable
I do realize it has been around before I was born, I was just a bit proud of my self for coming up with it on my own and not reading it elsewhere. Not grasping the concept? Why cause I dumbed it down?Originally Posted by Alleya
I bought the book. (*'-')b
lol :DOriginally Posted by Enkidu
Tell me what proof they have that time is the 4th dimension? I didn't really buy it when they explained it on flash movie.Originally Posted by Not Kuno
lol, people gave it a name and assigned it a number, just like how they named a line as "1st dimension", a surface as "2nd dimension" etc, god did not come down and say "time is number 4 doods" 8)Originally Posted by Avvesione
or maybe he did? i dunno![]()
There is another video that I have seen which talks about how particles picks up different characteristics just by being observed.
Without being observed the particles acted like a liquid and caused a certain outcome which puzzled the scientists. They did the test again but this time put a high speed supa zoomed in camera at the point where the characteristic would take place and the particles acting normally.
So while being watched they acted like they should in theory, but without the camera they acted totally different.
I can't find the video, but man that threw me for a loop. That shit is so interesting!
EDIT: no shit, the whole point in me telling that story is if any of you have the video post it!
pfft... thats what I was talking about too! great minds...Originally Posted by Shaede
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=poWT3wo_vWw
That was a great video! Does anybody here listen to Coast to Coast AM on the radio? George and Art usually have great programs on quantum physics.Originally Posted by Tape
We watched that in our HS physics class. And then again, after reading this thread, I watched this video again. I think that's very strange how when you begin measuring which slit they go through, their behavior changes.Originally Posted by Tape
Makes you think about what else is effected by this. If everything in creation is effected by observing it, then what does that mean for things not being observed. Do things only exist as they are if we look at them?Originally Posted by Avvesione
Not really, just the admission that the concept of a god exists. You could insert anything into that sentence really. "Admitting the existance is basically admitting the possibility of invisible pink unicorns." Existance of concept does not immediatly proceed the emperical existance of such a thing.Originally Posted by Alleya
SS/M-Theory started out as an explaination for strong-interacting force of subatomic particals but had weird 'extra' objects that did not fit into observation. Later on, they took a second look at those weird objects and the calculations that described them and realized they were the same as other non-strong interacting force particals, i.e weak-electromagnetic and even gravitational. Thus the first superstring revolution was born.
If a tree falls in a forest, and no one's there to hear it, does it make a sound?Originally Posted by Tape
![]()
The site makes me want to buy a Mac.![]()
String theory is one of my favorites. I really like how that flash presenteded it..
Or makes you wonder what things out there that we can't see (or that we can't sense at all) or things like that. Stuff that's out there but things that we can't observe.Originally Posted by Tape