Item Search
     
BG-Wiki Search
Page 4 of 52 FirstFirst ... 2 3 4 5 6 14 ... LastLast
Results 61 to 80 of 1040
  1. #61
    Chram
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    2,901
    BG Level
    7

    Quote Originally Posted by Mrp
    Quote Originally Posted by BRP
    The elitism in some post in this thread makes me want to vomit
    I Agree With u BRP, stop bitching . Huge Congratulation to Ichthyos, thanks you for all INFO u shared about your new toy.
    omg, MRP is BRP's second account, agreeing with himself!

  2. #62
    Salvage Bans
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    953
    BG Level
    5
    FFXIV Character
    Oro Oro
    FFXIV Server
    Hyperion
    FFXI Server
    Titan

    To clarify, Vipey's the one with the toy. I merely set up the WS tests and posted the data, hehe.

  3. #63
    BRP
    BRP is offline
    Banned.

    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    15,019
    BG Level
    9

    I would never say "u".

  4. #64
    Cerberus
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    440
    BG Level
    4

    Quote Originally Posted by BRP
    I would never say "u".
    split personalities then!

  5. #65
    HABS SUCK!!!!!
    Sepukku is my Hero
    Therrien's Cum Dumpster

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    37,884
    BG Level
    10
    FFXI Server
    Gilgamesh

    Quote Originally Posted by Lockecole
    Exactly, a mob has 4 shadows, you hit him with a 5 hit WS, so naturally you still get some hits in. Thats not "going through shadows" thats wiping them and still having hits left to damage. What I mean is that Sneak Attack if just used solely, will go through shadows, the first and second hit will do damage (the big SA, and the offhand) take no shadows off, leaving all 4 shadows up.
    Thats because the hits guaranteed by sneak attack register, whereas the extra hits (not guaranteed to land) are absorbed by utsusemi. Hence why I get 10% (main hand guaranteed, extra 4 hits not guaranteed, offhand hit guaranteed).


    Quote Originally Posted by RKenshin
    Not true, Utsesumi absorbs SA and SA WS until all 3 (or 4) shadows are gone.

    Blink/AA does not function the same way Utsesumi does, you will not always hit the shadows.
    well blm/thf full swing just got owned by utsu. I'll go back to that yag herald later on thf main, because I know for a fact I've hit ninja mobs with utsu up on thf main, had that attack round land, then had my subsequent melee shots absorbed by utsu.

  6. #66
    Yoshi P
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    5,016
    BG Level
    8

    I have to admit, it is pretty disappointing if this really doesn't have any MAB or Perpetuation. Disappointing to the point that I'd go so far as to say it's a bug and SE needs to fix it.

  7. #67
    Salvage Bans
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    953
    BG Level
    5
    FFXIV Character
    Oro Oro
    FFXIV Server
    Hyperion
    FFXI Server
    Titan

    I'm with NynJa about SATA on THF main. I can SA+WS mobs with Utsu up and have 2 (Dual Wielded) hits land.

  8. #68
    Cerberus
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    440
    BG Level
    4

    Quote Originally Posted by divisortheory
    I have to admit, it is pretty disappointing if this really doesn't have any MAB or Perpetuation. Disappointing to the point that I'd go so far as to say it's a bug and SE needs to fix it.
    Agreed. It should have more MAB than elemental staves. At least then it could actually be useful instead of some "toy".

  9. #69
    Chram
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    2,901
    BG Level
    7

    Quote Originally Posted by Ichthyos
    I'm with NynJa about SATA on THF main. I can SA+WS mobs with Utsu up and have 2 (Dual Wielded) hits land.
    Yeah I think we're all agreeing, just stating different examples, but they all fall under the same rules. At least I agree now.

  10. #70
    Salvage Bans
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    953
    BG Level
    5
    FFXIV Character
    Oro Oro
    FFXIV Server
    Hyperion
    FFXI Server
    Titan

    Ah ok hehe. I was probably reading too fast and misunderstood.

  11. #71
    Chram
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    2,737
    BG Level
    7

    She was the first NA alchemist to 100 on our server, too
    I'd definetly challenge her for that title! (Yeah its pointless, w/e ;>)

  12. #72
    Salvage Bans
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    939
    BG Level
    5

    Quote Originally Posted by Darus Grey
    She was the first NA alchemist to 100 on our server, too
    I'd definetly challenge her for that title! (Yeah its pointless, w/e ;>)
    I'll second Darus on this one. Vipey was a close second.. but I defintly remember hearing from a friend when you hit 100... miss Dekar ;x

  13. #73
    Relic Horn
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    3,132
    BG Level
    7
    FFXI Server
    Unicorn
    WoW Realm
    Shattered Hand

    SA seems to stack weird with multi-hit weapons too. I got SA'd by a THF in ballista once and he was offhanding or mainhanding merc kris; I got hit 3-4 times through my shadows. I have a screenshot of it somewhere...

    Grats on the Claustrum btw.

  14. #74
    Banned.

    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    1,205
    BG Level
    6

    yuo can also have triple attack, double attack land on the first round with that SA and then you will start hitting shadows

  15. #75
    Chram
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    2,901
    BG Level
    7

    Quote Originally Posted by Dezzimal
    SA seems to stack weird with multi-hit weapons too. I got SA'd by a THF in ballista once and he was offhanding or mainhanding merc kris; I got hit 3-4 times through my shadows. I have a screenshot of it somewhere...

    Grats on the Claustrum btw.
    Yeah, the first SET of attacks all go through shadows, as long as they're combined with the original Sneak Attack. So as many as 6 attacks with triple attacks, or 11 with Kraken.

  16. #76
    netz
    Guest

    Quote Originally Posted by Lockecole
    And as far as Hagun vs. Relic, when would you ever WS past 200% unless you were forced to. Even during 2hour, Hagun would probably end up being better, considering you'd get a 300%, 300% and a 200% WS.
    If the only WS you ever use at 100% is Kaiten, it's gonna be as good or better than 300% yuki/gekko/kasha from ushiki/onimaru/shinsoku. You also get the nice bonus of wielding a weapon that doesn't completely suck for normal melee attacks.

    2nd: Kaiten's 2nd element is Fragmentation, yes? 2HR > Gekko (300%) > Kasha (200%) > Kaiten (100% with TP being irrelevant beyond Store TP bonus). I'm pretty sure that's gonna crush Hagun's damage on Yukikaze > Gekko > Kasha for a light chain. Well, maybe not crush... that's a little ambitious...

  17. #77
    BRP
    BRP is offline
    Banned.

    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    15,019
    BG Level
    9

    Has the third effect been found out? Dispel and Refresh? Shouldn't there be a third? or is that only for Apoc.

    PS. Also has anyone checked for any spell bonus while the Refresh is on?

  18. #78
    St. Fiat
    THE TIME FOR QUESTIONS
    HAS PASSED

    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    3,645
    BG Level
    7

    Quote Originally Posted by netz
    2nd: Kaiten's 2nd element is Fragmentation, yes? 2HR > Gekko (300%) > Kasha (200%) > Kaiten (100% with TP being irrelevant beyond Store TP bonus). I'm pretty sure that's gonna crush Hagun's damage on Yukikaze > Gekko > Kasha for a light chain. Well, maybe not crush... that's a little ambitious...
    Kasha <-> Kaiten is Light.

    Kasha -> Kaiten -> Kaiten hi2u self-double light.

  19. #79
    Salvage Bans
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    953
    BG Level
    5
    FFXIV Character
    Oro Oro
    FFXIV Server
    Hyperion
    FFXI Server
    Titan

    Quote Originally Posted by Lockecole
    Quote Originally Posted by Dezzimal
    SA seems to stack weird with multi-hit weapons too. I got SA'd by a THF in ballista once and he was offhanding or mainhanding merc kris; I got hit 3-4 times through my shadows. I have a screenshot of it somewhere...

    Grats on the Claustrum btw.
    Yeah, the first SET of attacks all go through shadows, as long as they're combined with the original Sneak Attack. So as many as 6 attacks with triple attacks, or 11 with Kraken.
    Getting technical here, but apparently # of attacks in an attack round caps at 8. Wizerd posted this a while back somewhere, and I'm inclined to agree although I don't have hard proof. I haven't seen an attack round of more than 8 hits even when offhanding Kraken though.

  20. #80
    Bagel
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    1,406
    BG Level
    6

    No MAB and no -Perp.. what the fucking hell were they thinking?

Page 4 of 52 FirstFirst ... 2 3 4 5 6 14 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. March 10th PUP WS testing~
    By Jkun in forum FFXI: Everything
    Replies: 321
    Last Post: 2008-04-03, 15:37
  2. WS Changes testing
    By diony in forum FFXI: Everything
    Replies: 101
    Last Post: 2007-09-03, 03:45
  3. WS formula test
    By divisortheory in forum FFXI: Everything
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 2007-06-23, 13:56
  4. Replies: 10
    Last Post: 2007-06-11, 09:51
  5. Tests of weapons
    By banana in forum FFXI: Everything
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 2007-05-02, 02:24
  6. 4-man gate in the depths of Halvung
    By aurik in forum FFXI: Everything
    Replies: 44
    Last Post: 2006-05-13, 11:39
  7. Gate of Halvung ???
    By Krandor in forum FFXI: Everything
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 2006-04-26, 15:51