Item Search
     
BG-Wiki Search
Page 2 of 24 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 12 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 470
  1. #21
    New Merits
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    226
    BG Level
    4
    FFXI Server
    Bahamut

    Quote Originally Posted by DeadLegend
    (if he used chainspell, but then again dia has almost no recast anyway)
    except was on bard

  2. #22
    New Merits
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    249
    BG Level
    4

    even if you're botting, i don't see how the delay penalty recast wouldn't kick in. only explanation i can think of is he used chainspell... was it even a RDM?

    and plenty of people sub /WAR for all jobs at HNM camps, botting or not. not like Fafnir requires any skill for top-tier LS, or even average LS for that matter, might as well go for the claim. its pretty ignorant to accuse someone for botting simply because of their subjob.

  3. #23
    Xavier
    Guest

    I find it really funny that someone subbing warrior because they like claiming w/ voke over spells constitutes being a bot too.

    Deductive reasoning suggests that Dia's amazingly low recast/cast time, on top of his Dia landing after Fafnir was claimed doesn't seem that silly to me. For reference, he was wearing rostrum and the loc. earring for fast cast.

  4. #24
    Sea Torques
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    681
    BG Level
    5

    Either way, I don't think it could be conclusive evidence of a bot, like what was posted above, the chat log is absolute shit for telling what order things happend in. Those dias could have been way more spread out than they appear to be in that screenshot.

  5. #25
    Black Belt
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    4,921
    BG Level
    7

    well this i do know.

    he was on BRD/WHM.

    he was in the alliance and the alliance got claim. so there would be no "your target is claimed" interruption.

  6. #26
    New Merits
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    249
    BG Level
    4

    Quote Originally Posted by Xavier
    I find it really funny that someone subbing warrior because they like claiming w/ voke over spells constitutes being a bot too.

    Deductive reasoning suggests that Dia's amazingly low recast/cast time, on top of his Dia landing after Fafnir was claimed doesn't seem that silly to me. For reference, he was wearing rostrum and the loc. earring for fast cast.
    you would need to experiment with the delay of an early claim attempt vs. the natural recast delay of the spell.

    when you try to claim too early, you're " penalized", and you're unable to perform actions for a brief moment, however i'm not sure if its reflected in your JA or MA recast timers.

  7. #27
    Cerberus
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    372
    BG Level
    4
    FFXI Server
    Bahamut

    lol... I have personally been to Tonko's house. I have seen his computer. I have went through his computer... He has no such bots. He has never botted. He has no intention of botting. So, I don't see where the "maybe its true" thoughts are coming from.

    I also find it funny, how we can claim 3 Fafs in a row, and automatically be classified as botters. Thats not really fair is it?

    But anyway... grats Shiz! See ya guys tomorrow @ Nid.

  8. #28
    Xavier
    Guest

    Quote Originally Posted by phirien
    Quote Originally Posted by Xavier
    I find it really funny that someone subbing warrior because they like claiming w/ voke over spells constitutes being a bot too.

    Deductive reasoning suggests that Dia's amazingly low recast/cast time, on top of his Dia landing after Fafnir was claimed doesn't seem that silly to me. For reference, he was wearing rostrum and the loc. earring for fast cast.
    you would need to experiment with the delay of an early claim attempt vs. the natural recast delay of the spell.

    when you try to claim too early, you're " penalized", and you're unable to perform actions for a brief moment, however i'm not sure if its reflected in your JA or MA recast timers.
    Yes, but theres no indication that his Dia was penalized by the claim issue since it stands to reason his Dia could've landed after the initial claim, meaning he was on a normal casting/recast time w/ the spell. Either way that SS fails because it doesn't show what happened w/ the Dias after he casted.

  9. #29
    Melee Summoner
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    34
    BG Level
    1

    Oo People still care about who bots and who does not?

  10. #30
    Cerberus
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    423
    BG Level
    4

    Come on guys, you know RDM/WAR kicks ass!!! XBOX LIVE PT's FTW




    Okay aside from that, I honestly can't see enough evidence on Tonko, and not to be gay or anything but just from playing with him when I was a little boy in anbu/sb, I can't see him being a hardcore b00t0rz. I've seen other legit attempts to claim like that.




    flame on!

  11. #31
    New Merits
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    220
    BG Level
    4

    definitely something wrong with casting times, no way he couldve casted 3 times that fast. especially as brd

  12. #32
    New Merits
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    249
    BG Level
    4

    Quote Originally Posted by Xavier
    Quote Originally Posted by phirien
    Quote Originally Posted by Xavier
    I find it really funny that someone subbing warrior because they like claiming w/ voke over spells constitutes being a bot too.

    Deductive reasoning suggests that Dia's amazingly low recast/cast time, on top of his Dia landing after Fafnir was claimed doesn't seem that silly to me. For reference, he was wearing rostrum and the loc. earring for fast cast.
    you would need to experiment with the delay of an early claim attempt vs. the natural recast delay of the spell.

    when you try to claim too early, you're " penalized", and you're unable to perform actions for a brief moment, however i'm not sure if its reflected in your JA or MA recast timers.
    Yes, but theres no indication that his Dia was penalized by the claim issue since it stands to reason his Dia could've landed after the initial claim, meaning he was on a normal casting/recast time w/ the spell. Either way that SS fails because it doesn't show what happened w/ the Dias after he casted.
    maybe the spell was interrupted, is that 'filterable'?

    if there was a way to force yourself through the claim delay with repeated casts, then you would see this bot much more often. while you can set a bot to loop a macro, the claim delay penalty will still kick in, so unless this guy programmed a new bot, i doubt it involved a 3rd party program.

  13. #33
    Fake Numbers
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    80
    BG Level
    2

    Even if he landed the first dia, why did he cast it another 2 times in a row? Did someone forget to turn the bot off again after claim?

  14. #34
    Bagel
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    1,390
    BG Level
    6
    FFXIV Character
    Ellatrix Reatori
    FFXIV Server
    Sargatanas
    FFXI Server
    Fenrir

    There is no "Your casting was interrupted" message if you cast too fast. It just stops.

  15. #35
    Sea Torques
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    681
    BG Level
    5

    Quote Originally Posted by Dusky
    Even if he landed the first dia, why did he cast it another 2 times in a row? Did someone forget to turn the bot off again after claim?
    Because of lag and possibly that retarded new claim system?

  16. #36
    Relic Horn
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    3,132
    BG Level
    7
    FFXI Server
    Unicorn
    WoW Realm
    Shattered Hand

    Everyone bots, some are just more adamant about hiding it than others.

  17. #37
    New Merits
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    249
    BG Level
    4

    Quote Originally Posted by Dammerung
    There is no "Your casting was interrupted" message if you cast too fast. It just stops.
    yeah i'm aware. my bad, i was under the impression they won claim for some reason, but now it appears they didn't.

  18. #38
    D. Ring
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    4,655
    BG Level
    7

    Quote Originally Posted by Dezzimal
    Everyone bots, some are just more adamant about hiding it than others.
    Not all servers are unicorn lol

  19. #39
    Cerberus
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    423
    BG Level
    4

  20. #40
    Saint Daahan Von Quitter the 1st
    Patron of Yin

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    4,564
    BG Level
    7

    I hope BG claims again tomorrow so they can up the ante and accuse us of duping and being gilsellers as well 8)

Page 2 of 24 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 12 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. someone explain furniture to me
    By Judah in forum FFXI: Everything
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 2005-12-29, 15:45