except was on bardOriginally Posted by DeadLegend
except was on bardOriginally Posted by DeadLegend
even if you're botting, i don't see how the delay penalty recast wouldn't kick in. only explanation i can think of is he used chainspell... was it even a RDM?
and plenty of people sub /WAR for all jobs at HNM camps, botting or not. not like Fafnir requires any skill for top-tier LS, or even average LS for that matter, might as well go for the claim. its pretty ignorant to accuse someone for botting simply because of their subjob.
I find it really funny that someone subbing warrior because they like claiming w/ voke over spells constitutes being a bot too.
Deductive reasoning suggests that Dia's amazingly low recast/cast time, on top of his Dia landing after Fafnir was claimed doesn't seem that silly to me. For reference, he was wearing rostrum and the loc. earring for fast cast.
Either way, I don't think it could be conclusive evidence of a bot, like what was posted above, the chat log is absolute shit for telling what order things happend in. Those dias could have been way more spread out than they appear to be in that screenshot.
well this i do know.
he was on BRD/WHM.
he was in the alliance and the alliance got claim. so there would be no "your target is claimed" interruption.
you would need to experiment with the delay of an early claim attempt vs. the natural recast delay of the spell.Originally Posted by Xavier
when you try to claim too early, you're " penalized", and you're unable to perform actions for a brief moment, however i'm not sure if its reflected in your JA or MA recast timers.
lol... I have personally been to Tonko's house. I have seen his computer. I have went through his computer... He has no such bots. He has never botted. He has no intention of botting. So, I don't see where the "maybe its true" thoughts are coming from.
I also find it funny, how we can claim 3 Fafs in a row, and automatically be classified as botters. Thats not really fair is it?
But anyway... grats Shiz! See ya guys tomorrow @ Nid.
Yes, but theres no indication that his Dia was penalized by the claim issue since it stands to reason his Dia could've landed after the initial claim, meaning he was on a normal casting/recast time w/ the spell. Either way that SS fails because it doesn't show what happened w/ the Dias after he casted.Originally Posted by phirien
Oo People still care about who bots and who does not?
Come on guys, you know RDM/WAR kicks ass!!! XBOX LIVE PT's FTW
Okay aside from that, I honestly can't see enough evidence on Tonko, and not to be gay or anything but just from playing with him when I was a little boy in anbu/sb, I can't see him being a hardcore b00t0rz. I've seen other legit attempts to claim like that.
flame on!
definitely something wrong with casting times, no way he couldve casted 3 times that fast. especially as brd
maybe the spell was interrupted, is that 'filterable'?Originally Posted by Xavier
if there was a way to force yourself through the claim delay with repeated casts, then you would see this bot much more often. while you can set a bot to loop a macro, the claim delay penalty will still kick in, so unless this guy programmed a new bot, i doubt it involved a 3rd party program.
Even if he landed the first dia, why did he cast it another 2 times in a row? Did someone forget to turn the bot off again after claim?![]()
There is no "Your casting was interrupted" message if you cast too fast. It just stops.
Because of lag and possibly that retarded new claim system?Originally Posted by Dusky
Everyone bots, some are just more adamant about hiding it than others.
yeah i'm aware. my bad, i was under the impression they won claim for some reason, but now it appears they didn't.Originally Posted by Dammerung
Not all servers are unicorn lolOriginally Posted by Dezzimal
I hope BG claims again tomorrow so they can up the ante and accuse us of duping and being gilsellers as well 8)