
Originally Posted by
Merryck
Hey, good job, way to find my point. The whole reason I said that is because Tetris is no more a RPG than FFVIII is a FPS. His argument is that you play the role of a person dropping blocks. That's an idiotic statement, because you don't play the role of anyone. All you do is turn the blocks as they are falling to make them fit, and once you've created a full line, the line is deleted. That does not constitute playing a role.
Yes, Haelian, Mario and Metroid are menial, the latter moreso than the former. These games have not at all revolutionized gaming in any way, shape or form. They simply exist so that Nintendo can keep whoring out the same characters over and over again until one day when people finally decide they're tired of seeing the same little bastard in a red hat doing something that's only remotely different from what he did in the last 10 games that involved him.
I didn't say that "experience-points-to-level-up" was only in PnP D&D. What I said is that it's the only game, to my knowledge, that truly allows you to choose your own alignment. Learn to read, dickweed. The fact that you don't know what PnP D&D is takes away a certain level of credibility from your argument, in my opinion.
Zelda: Wind Waker, from what I've heard, was also the shittiest Zelda game ever created, disallowing the freedoms that were given in most of the other Zelda games, and destroying the gameplay style that had been in place within the Legend of Zelda games since the very first one. Furthermore, I don't even see where it lists the genre of the game on GameSpot, but if you look it up on any of the other gaming retail websites, it's listed as Adventure/Role-playing. So, have a face full of your own foot, on the house.
I'm attacking your method of determining a RPG, because you were stupid enough to say that, based on how "loose" the genres are for the videogaming world, you could say that Tetris fits into that category. I can pretty much guarantee that if you were to say that in a serious discussion with a gamer in the real world, they would ignore you from that point on.
How did Zelda revolutionize gaming where Mario didn't? Last I checked, games like Super Mario Bros. 3 and Mario 64 were major hits and I have faith that they would've been no matter what name they were given. Mario 64 was simply groundbreaking and it's crazy to say otherwise. I do think Zelda has evolved well, but no better than Mario or Metroid. Zelda's transition from overhead 2D to 3D was great, Mario's 2D platformer to 3D was great, Metroid.. maybe not AS great but definitely well enough.
You can't say that the Mario and Metroid series are milking the name when they are
still releasing great games. It'd be different if they were throwing out shitty games with the same label, but they're not.
Assuming Wind Waker is a shitty game just from "what you've heard" is pretty ignorant. Someone told me it sucked before I got it, went out and bought it anyway and had a great time with it. But anyway, here's a link to
Ocarina of Time/Master Quest on Gamespot where it clearly says
Genre: Fantasy Action Adventure.
Might want to learn to read yourself also, since it was someone else who mentioned alignment and you are, for whatever the reason, combining my post with his/hers. And I at least managed to find the word "genre" on a website, dickweed.
The Tetris thing was stupid, I admit, but I was simply trying to make the point that the term RPG is so broad that it can describe a vast majority of games, and that the literal meaning has little to do with which games the its' label is placed on.