
Originally Posted by
Vishnevskiy
What's wrong with upgrading any relic if we can do it every 2 weeks? We are currently upgrading a relic from stage4 to 5 in about 2 weeks, every 2-3 weeks. We have an Aegis currently collecting coins for Stage5, an Apocalypse @1500 away from Stage4 which will go after the Aegis, then a Mandau which is @2500 which will go after the Apoc, and then a Ghorn, and so on. The linkshell provides countless ways to make money from helping camp HNM, helping find buyers for things we don't need, and before we started farming relics we distributed the fund in 5mil chunks to people who wanted it over items. This way more people can get relics and if one of them happens to turn into a douche bag and leaves, we don't have to blame ourselves for choosing them for a relic, it's an unbiased system, people rarely leave this linkshell, but when one of our fully funded Aegis did, it hurt a lot.
You're not understanding me Stan.
I meant that I liked your system, it sounds really fair because you're not making distinctions between upgrading one relic over another. Anyone who shows the dedication to contribution is considered, and that's why I wasn't expecting it. That's why I made the Ragnarok/Gungnir comment, both of those relics might not be considered on the same caliber as an Aegis, Excalibur, Apoc, Bravura, etc., but it's good to see that you guys would still upgrade if the person contributed enough.
Typically big LSes only upgrade relics for their senior members or for members who are upgrading Aegis or G.Horn, etc. It's more rare to see a linkshell that won't make those distinctions.