
Originally Posted by
safer
sorry to chime in , but i think the problem has to do with peoples definitions of words, in this case selfish...
as far as i can tell.. xavier is saying that unless you do something that is 100% selfless, you are being selfish... by brennon not being even more charitable in giving her account away, she is being selfish....
reminds me of the saying "if you're not with us, you're against us"
wafik seems to be saying that, just because you didnt do something selfless, that doesnt make you selfish.. you are neutral in that case, or fall under a different catagory.. "not 100% selfless"... (i understand she showed her selflessness by other means, and im not here to judge her either way ) and that is not a bad thing, nor is it the same as being selfish
personally i agree with wafik... this isnt a black and white arguement, you have to take into consideration all the shades of grey inbetween