Hydra Haubert

[Neosutra]

Yes, i have tried my damn hardest to keep the thread on track, and yes i have been unsuccessful. But does that really mean you have to be a dick about it?

I have to play the penty card and say yes, yes he does. You should have known this would happen when you posted the thread, especially since I know you've seen the lolSash threads.

So the right response is attack another member? Or to drop it and move on?

And actually no, other then the first page, i havent really read the lolsash, i could care less about forum drama.

[Veli]

I would kick a WAR from my dynamis shell if they wanted to lot that. I fuckin hate greedy people who just want anything they can equip.

[Teorem]

I am in the process of discussing job prioritization of Hydra armor with the leadership of our linkshell. Not because there is a (now) 19-page thread on Blue Gartr regarding it, but because a linkshell member asked us to.

Neosutra, I made this clear in the very first sentence of my response to your initial question that I would be doing this. There was not room for ambiguity, and I did not give you a definitive "no."

I question whether the dialogue you and Izzy are having now is at all constructive. I did not close the thread on our forums just to watch you two bicker here instead. I have no intention of imposing a moratorium on DB members' posting activities, but consider whether or not you are actually helping things with this exchange.

You're not.

Blue Gartr's opinion is that the Hydra Haubert is best used by a PLD. The opinion does not mean nothing to me, and it's one I share myself.

However, the opinions regarding our linkshell rules and our general success are not as relevant to the decisions we will be making, though having and expressing your opinion is certainly your entitlement within Blue Gartr's forum rules.

[Janice]

BLM should get hydra beret. (totally serious)

[Epincus]

Yes, i have tried my damn hardest to keep the thread on track, and yes i have been unsuccessful. But does that really mean you have to be a dick about it?

I have to play the penty card and say yes, yes he does. You should have known this would happen when you posted the thread, especially since I know you've seen the lolSash threads.

So the right response is attack another member? Or to drop it and move on?

And actually no, other then the first page, i havent really read the lolsash, i could care less about forum drama.

The right response is that you began this post for whatever reason you did. It has not helped matters, and the result is you earning whatever disapproval you attain.

Nonetheless, I'm not a member of dynamisbums, and I'm not active within it's community anymore. I've said what I will.

[Neosutra]

Yes, i have tried my damn hardest to keep the thread on track, and yes i have been unsuccessful. But does that really mean you have to be a dick about it?

I have to play the penty card and say yes, yes he does. You should have known this would happen when you posted the thread, especially since I know you've seen the lolSash threads.

So the right response is attack another member? Or to drop it and move on?

And actually no, other then the first page, i havent really read the lolsash, i could care less about forum drama.

.

Thankyou cpt obvious .

And yes, Teo summed it up pretty well.

Me and izzy have resolved our debate on an offline manner. And i will talk with kain as well to ensure no long term damage is done to anyone. Dbums is a great LS, and the chief concern from all of this is not who got what item, but that no one leaves the situation feeling jaded.

Thankyou for all of your input.

[Veli]

If your leader couldnt decide who gets what by now your leader sucks.

[Septimus]

I don't know how people thought this wouldn't be brought up outside of the LS eventually. The guy who got the Haubert posted it on KI, it would have caught fire here with a "OMG, look at this loot-whore" thread. I would be terrified to party with a WAR who needs 9 Enmity in a merit party, any WAR worth his/her salt doesn't need 9 enmity to get his/her face caved in.

This is very lol.

[Senoska]

THIS THREAD IS FUCKING RETARDED

[Akiyama]

414 PLD 10 WAR. I think it's safe to say the people have spoken.

[Septimus]

THIS THREAD IS FUCKING RETARDED

And so is a WAR getting a nearly nonexistent +9 enmity item when he already has a +8 enmity item for free...

[Senoska]

THIS THREAD IS FUCKING RETARDED

And so is a WAR getting a nearly nonexistent +9 enmity item when he already has a +8 enmity item for free...

okay its established get rid of this thread already, my god.

[FFXIFlux]

THIS THREAD IS FUCKING RETARDED

And so is a WAR getting a nearly nonexistent +9 enmity item when he already has a +8 enmity item for free...

And why would he even want that +8 enmity for a merit party? Why, why why? Any WAR equipping either of those in a merit party would be just asking to get themselves kicked for being a retard.

[Isildur]

THIS THREAD IS FUCKING RETARDED

And so is a WAR getting a nearly nonexistent +9 enmity item when he already has a +8 enmity item for free...

And why would he even want that +8 enmity for a merit party? Why, why why? Any WAR equipping either of those in a merit party would be just asking to get themselves kicked for being a retard.

(HaubertWAR) HAY GUYZ CHECK IT OUT MY +9 ENMITY WILL HOLD HATE LULZ
*EbodyWAR rampages Puk for 1100 points of damage*
(EbodyWAR) whats that?
*HaubertWAR rampages for 500 points of damage*
*EbodyWAR still holds hate*
(HaubertWAR) okay my BP is broken, it has nothing to do with being a retarded player

[Don Katsu]

This is worse than giving a Koenig Body to a WAR...

[Thalion]

Kain its time for a name change, everytime I see it I think "loldrg".

[Kurohyou]

Kain its time for a name change, everytime I see it I think "loldrg".

He was originally a DRG main. I'm not sure if he considers himself such, but he's listed as a WAR on DB's site.

[GSDragoon]

Kain its time for a name change, everytime I see it I think "loldrg".

He was originally a DRG main. I'm not sure if he considers himself such, but he's listed as a WAR on DB's site.

I've always been a fan of the dragoon job, since FFIV(thus the name). The listing on DB is for lotting. I have full DRG and 4/5 war. I'm not going to finish war body and I can't get anything else for DRG except -1 body(which I have drg listed as upgrade job). I don't have another job leveled 70+, so I just stay war. Not like it matters, there's no other regular relic armor I can get. I just keep doing dynamis for the fun of it.

I'll repeat this again, I do not meele with it in exp parties. I happened to use it for that last 30 minutes when the PLD left. And I'm not stupid enough to not use equip macro's for WS's. But people here just want to cause problems. I honestly don't know what Neo was thinking when he posted here. Was he expecting a civil discussion on BG? I posted a pic on KI and it didn't start any crap there.

[Burginator]

Large post of attempted justification of a blatantly inconsiderate and loot whorish act

Shut up.



And yeah -- The rule should be changed, in my opinion. However, I guess, if your entire linkshellis fine with it, my opinion doesn't matter much, and this entire thread didn't matter, since your LS was happy with it anyway. Change the rule if you want some degree of intelligence to go into loot distribution. Don't change it if you'd rather see freakishly awesome pieces of gear go to waste.

[inafume]

Don't change it if you'd rather see freakishly awesome pieces of gear go to waste.

It can go to a PLD and *still go to waste.* It's a Dynamis shell, not an HNM shell that also does Dynamis. They shouldn't have to take non-Dynamis events into consideration. Most shit in Dynamis doesn't last long enough for piles of +enmity to matter.

Otherwise you'd have to give priority to the PLD in an HNM shell over one that isn't. And that's a fucking stupid way to run a shell.