
Originally Posted by
Julian
hmm, you're right, maybe war and mnk should be higher.
mnk should also extend lower cause of all the gimp mnks who eat sushi and use warwolf or life belts.
Or maybe, that Mnk should be lower then it is compared to NINs as far as "usefulness" in merits. Mnks can do sick dmg sure, But in my experience its mostly the case when they go Mnk/War. And for a "ideal" merit melee burn party a Mnk/war is not what you want. A mnk/war becomes THE tank, thus becoming a MP leech, which means extra wasted mp curing the said mnk./war to keep then alive. Ideally the mnk has to come Mnk/nin which in turn drasticly drops its oevrall dmg output.
My experience with super equipped DD Ninja has been, that those DD Ninja only get outparsed by Ridill wielding Wars. So ninja should be higher then what it is now.
Id also argue Sams standing on this chart as most sams end up tanking the party too. I also see Sam/thfs parsing pretty high too. Though they pull crazy hate too. So i dont see how Sams that do a lot of dmg, and spam WS' are so low on the list.
Id also argue the Rmg and Blu standing on this chart, cause im not sure why Blus name is so far below Rng for usefulness in merit, despite the top of the line user for both being so close (according to this chart). So why is the name for blu so far below it? Is it because your rng goes and pulls or something? So i dont understand the higher usabilty for rng over blu. Esecially when blus pull way more hate cause of the dmg they do, then rngs, who usually only pull hate off good nins and Wars when they WS.
And lastly teh chart gives WAY way more credit to bottom of the line mnks and Wars. EVen a DRG is better then a crappy War or crappy Mnk, hell anything is, as long as that anyone isnt a crappy user of his or her job.
So yea, to me the chart is not accurate.