Bleach

**Khajit** · 2010-10-10 23:03

What chapter is this bottomless pit in?

**Serra** · 2010-10-10 23:50

If it's the one I'm thinking of, it's the one around when Ichigo fights Ikkaku and Ganju 'fights' Yumichka. They were pits that they threw criminals into and let hollows eat them. But Yumichka specifically says they stopped doing that because it was barbaric or something.

I'm still bothered by what Souj pointed out.. Rukia giving her powers to someone has a set-in-stone sentence of death, but rebelling against Soul Society doesn't? I mean seriously, there has to be >>some<< consistency >.> <.<;

**LinktheDeme** · 2010-10-10 23:58

Originally Posted by Ayn

I laughed.

You know what also made me laugh?

Shunsui, Byakuya, and Kenpachi talking about the Haori. Especially Byakuya's lines. Fucking classic. Basically saying "I'm rich, bitch."

"You fools! What do you think your Captain's haori are?"
"Stylish?"
"Cheap."
"A pain in the ass."

you're supposed to read it from right to left, not left to right thus a pain in the ass came first, then cheap, then stylish.
This isnt huge to be nitpicking just making sure you know when you read them otherwise they flow really weirdly

**Souj** · 2010-10-11 00:53

Originally Posted by Serra

If it's the one I'm thinking of, it's the one around when Ichigo fights Ikkaku and Ganju 'fights' Yumichka. They were pits that they threw criminals into and let hollows eat them. But Yumichka specifically says they stopped doing that because it was barbaric or something.

Yumichika was lying to scare Ganju. The pit is only used for garbage.

**Khajit** · 2010-10-11 01:33

Evidently people forgot that there was no such thing as a bottomless pit used for execution in bleach.

**Lonewind** · 2010-10-11 01:49

Originally Posted by Serra

If it's the one I'm thinking of, it's the one around when Ichigo fights Ikkaku and Ganju 'fights' Yumichka. They were pits that they threw criminals into and let hollows eat them. But Yumichka specifically says they stopped doing that because it was barbaric or something.

I'm still bothered by what Souj pointed out.. Rukia giving her powers to someone has a set-in-stone sentence of death, but rebelling against Soul Society doesn't? I mean seriously, there has to be >>some<< consistency >.> <.<;

is it "set-in-stone" or is it just orders fro the Aizen controlled fake 46

**orson** · 2010-10-11 02:46

Originally Posted by Lonewind

is it "set-in-stone" or is it just orders fro the Aizen controlled fake 46

Ya in fairness Aizen killed the original 46 and that's why a lot of people were very confused that such a harsh plenty was passed down on Rukia. This was back when things actually had proper continuity though. I'm almost 100% positive Kubo has forgotten or could care less about everything that's happened prior to the current issue he's writing atm for his pay check.

**Lonewind** · 2010-10-11 03:08

Originally Posted by orson

Ya in fairness Aizen killed the original 46 and that's why a lot of people were very confused that such a harsh plenty was passed down on Rukia. This was back when things actually had proper continuity though. I'm almost 100% positive Kubo has forgotten or could care less about everything that's happened prior to the current issue he's writing atm for his pay check.

In the most recent Bleach 46 Manga (not the shonen jump), on the cover where the author says a few words, basically kubo stated that he had a lot of changes in the "supervisors" (if you read Bakuman you'll know the proper term for those people that goes over the contents with the author, of which the author can't choose who they are), maybe kubo just got crappy ones...

**kuronosan** · 2010-10-11 09:12

Hmm. Well apparently the statement about the seki-seki was an anime-only plot. There was, however, that tower that was made of seki-seki.

My apologies.

**Serra** · 2010-10-11 13:08

I thought the crime had a definite sentence of death, but Aizen manipulated them into using the Sokyoku since he needed to complete wipe out her spirit or whatever. The issues were that they were using such an extreme method and also no one would listen to any appeals regarding the situation.

**Lonewind** · 2010-10-11 19:57

Originally Posted by Serra

I thought the crime had a definite sentence of death, but Aizen manipulated them into using the Sokyoku since he needed to complete wipe out her spirit or whatever. The issues were that they were using such an extreme method and also no one would listen to any appeals regarding the situation.

just pull a kubo and say, everyone was under kyoka suigetsu/kanzen saimin....

**Khajit** · 2010-10-11 20:09

Nah. the whole execution thing was probably a possible sentence only because of the sheer power the 42 commanded when it came down to laws. As you've seen in the minus chapters they are overzealous and completely pigheaded to the point of buffoonery but literally none really question their sentencing. The fact that as many shinigami actually rebelled as a result of the execution being scheduled shows just how ridiculously over the top that execution order against Rukia was.

**Pirian** · 2010-10-11 22:49

Originally Posted by Khajit

Nah. the whole execution thing was probably a possible sentence only because of the sheer power the 42 commanded when it came down to laws. As you've seen in the minus chapters they are overzealous and completely pigheaded to the point of buffoonery but literally none really question their sentencing. The fact that as many shinigami actually rebelled as a result of the execution being scheduled shows just how ridiculously over the top that execution order against Rukia was.

I could have sworn that Byakuya could have legitimately contested the sentence but didn't because of family pride and such

**Serra** · 2010-10-12 00:06

Originally Posted by Pirian

I could have sworn that Byakuya could have legitimately contested the sentence but didn't because of family pride and such

Yeah, I remember that too. Renji visits Rukia in her cell and tells her it'll be ok since Byakuya 'll appeal it and use his clout or whatever. But then Byakuya enters the room and says that the date has been finalized or something along those lines.

**Guitarman** · 2010-10-12 06:23

http://www.animecrazy.net/bleach-episode-292/

whole lot of nothing, but there it is.

**arus2001** · 2010-10-12 06:38

That opening has me thinking that don't plan on jumping to filler and might even catch up to the manga.

**DrClout** · 2010-10-12 09:35

Originally Posted by arus2001

That opening has me thinking that don't plan on jumping to filler and might even catch up to the manga.

I didn't watch it myself but it would be perfect way to end the animated series before jumping into a new arc. Or at least hoping for an end to the anime.

**Serra** · 2010-10-13 00:47

Watching this episode reminded me how retarded it is when

Spoiler: show

I mean seriously, it just does not fit in at all with how this sequence plays out for that to suddenly happen. Especially Ichigo's "what are you guys doing" thing >.>;

**Xno Kappa** · 2010-10-13 14:16

You were under the impression Aizen was not not using KS.

New OP seems like they going to go through the whole Deicide arc, it has a few seconds of Ichigo with the three month hair length and insinuates pretty heavily Gin dies. I wonder how they're going to explain filler though with Ichigo losing his powers since I'm expecting a Bount-sized arc to deal with the anime catching up to the manga. Shit's always funny when filler contradicts canon pretty heavily.

**Qalbert** · 2010-10-13 14:31

giant flashback arc to random sidestory? idk

Thread: Bleach

Thread Tools

Latest Threads

Up & Coming Threads

Hottest Threads