Folk Souls demo coming to japan PSN network in early June and release date in japan is 6/21. Here a link with information and update screen shoots (note information is in Japaneses).
http://www.watch.impress.co.jp/game/doc ... 425/fs.htm
Folk Souls demo coming to japan PSN network in early June and release date in japan is 6/21. Here a link with information and update screen shoots (note information is in Japaneses).
http://www.watch.impress.co.jp/game/doc ... 425/fs.htm
As cool as it would be of Sony to make the 60 gig cost 500 and the 80 cost 600, it just does not make any sense to me.
Why would they release a new hard drive SKU that is smaller than the 360s? At the very least they would do 120 I would think, if not 150, just to 1-up them. And then price it at 599, and show how it is a better deal than the Elite.
But if they do drop that 60 SKU to 500 I would be on it like a fat kid on a donut fo sho.
Maybe I'm wrong about the $500 dollar 60/80GB PS3 system. It's a real possibility because the prices of the laser diodes will drop like a $100 dollars.
900 yen is like $7.60.
http://www.sony.net/SonyInfo/News/Pr...37E/index.html
With removal of the EE chip, the move to 65nm and diode prices, they could drop the ps3 to $400ish sooner then expected.
Po, you ever try Gaiden on the 360? I hear it's upscaled nicely to 720p.
As odd as I think it is for them to drop the price by that big of an amount this soon, I would also be far more interested in a PS3 if they dropped down to $400 (if combined with some games that I'd like, most they are showcasing now to me are blah). That's the magic number for me for some reason.Originally Posted by Semitry
Yea, that is what I played it on. But there was a comparison video between the upscaled 360 version, and the remake version. And it wasn't even close.Originally Posted by Semitry
I agree with the 400 number as well. But it will still need a hell of a lot more games for me to buy it. I seriously cant picture myself buying one this year, not even really next year either. 2008 Christmas might be the earlliest Id consider buying one.
ps3 sucksOriginally Posted by Mysterio
PS3 Bandwagon has lots of room.
Deejay was mr pro-nintendo upon release of the Wii, now hes slithered over to camp Microsoft I see and denying any wrongdoing.
Next Gen happened too soon. As is made obvious by the PS2 being the best selling console last month, the DS being the best hardware selling period, and the Wii being the "Next-Gen" current stalwart (correct word?). Not counting M$'s lead since they had a year head start. I am starting with November 06 when everyone had all their shit out.
Not one of those systems costs above 250, so obviously price is still the biggest barricade.
By the time the mainstream is ready for Next Gen, 1-2 years mebbe(?), hopefully the Wii:
1) Has its shit together and releases more good games and not 934839489 licensed Disney and Pixar games and 2 good games.
2) Has a big enough lead that it is too late for MS and Sony.
disclaimer: I am not speaking as a fanboy, by then I see myself owning all 3 consoles. Currently I own 2, but I would like to see Nintendo win this generation just because I am most fond of that company.
Anyway, if Wii does not get its shit together and/or have a big enough lead, then the PS3/360 will be in enough hands and take the lead from Nintendo.
Period.
btw, which sold more, GC or Xbox 1? (ps remember GC is still selling while Xbox 1 isn't).
Since when lol? Why are you so butt-hurt over me proving you wrong? Considering the only posts i ever made about nintendo were when I said they have the best exclusives.Originally Posted by Mysterio
I already asked you to quote any of my posts that are "rediculous" or scream fanboy.
I've been backing up 360 from the beginning, considering i've had one since release. Ask me anything about Halo lol.
GC sold 21.5 as of December. Xbox has sold 24.Originally Posted by Po
Both systems failed miserably compared to PS2 (sold 115 million), which is why people still think PS3 will still win this generation no-contest. Which is why I dont like to call those people stupid quite yet, just misinformed.![]()
Why isn't Master Chief black?Originally Posted by Deejay
One of the first Halo 2 trailers actually showed a couple seconds of master chief putting his helmet on with one of these black general dudes talking to him. The first time i saw it I got confused because I thought the camera was just looking at Master Chief putting the helmet on, but you were actually looking through master chiefs eye's while the black dude was talking to him lol.
Bungie hasn't and most likely wont ever show master chief's face because they want everyone to be able to identify with him regardless of race or religion. (Sort of like how Link never really has a voice in any of his games.) He has a sort of low raspy voice that sounds like a mix between denzel washington or vin diesel. You could even say he sounds like an older Jason Statham minus the accent.
I would hate for Bungie to reveal the Master Chief's face. It'd be kinda like when a book you really like gets turned into a movie and they cast Jackass McMoviestar in the lead role, though he looks nothing like the book says the character does. It'd be kinda like that, but worse, I think.
Bungie is worrying about actual gameplay first before they upgrade the game from a graphical standpoint. And judging by how good the last two halo's looked, I find it funny that anyone could doubt that.Originally Posted by Deejay
doesnt matter halo has always been a shit game anyways, sold on the hype of the people playing it and no one wanting to be the person saying that they don't have halo.
Halo 3 doesn't look bad at all, it's an improvement from Halo 2 judging by those screenies.
Looks like a HD treatment to Halo 2 as the graphical style seems to be the same as previous two.
Hopefully this game can live up to the ridiculous hype it's been given. I would assume they learned from their mistakes on Halo 2.
I don't think the 360 guys will need to worry much, they'll repeat the same formula they have with the other 2 halo's and why mess with something that isn't broken. This game should satisfy the hardcore gamers.
haha that may be true as well, but XBOX has a big FPS following, and this game could cause a real stir if it winds up falling short of Gears of War. Stir in a bad way lolOriginally Posted by izembo
I don't think people who say that Halo sucks have even played the game(s). Halo 1 LAN cannot be topped.
I will agree that Halo 2 was a letdown, and definitely not as good as Halo 1, but it was not a bad game by any means.
Also, lol @ people who have been trashing Halo 3's graphics...from the ALPHA and BETA builds of the game.
i don't think it'll top gears, and if it does, it'll only because it's named halo, not because it's a better game.
me personally? i'll take a fast paced shooter game over that slow as hell halo shit anyday.