I'm so good, except I think Duke got a sweetheart draw, getting VCU and Pitt. K can get the inside scoop on VCU from Caple, and Duke matches up really, really well with Pitt. Good chance Duke will be in the sweet 16Originally Posted by edgarfigaro
I'm so good, except I think Duke got a sweetheart draw, getting VCU and Pitt. K can get the inside scoop on VCU from Caple, and Duke matches up really, really well with Pitt. Good chance Duke will be in the sweet 16Originally Posted by edgarfigaro
Wonder if we'll do a BG Tourney.
Also, I was right about Duke being no higher than 6. That's cool, but VCU.. ouch. I'm gonna hope VCU puts them down.Originally Posted by edgarfigaro
Yup. Making it now.Originally Posted by Akiyama
Wisconsin as a 2 seed, starting in Chicago. No complaints here. I still wonder if we would've gotten the 1 seed if we had beaten Ohio State today, but whatever.
Men's Tournament Pick Em Topic:
http://www.bluegartr.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=17146
Wow, Texas Tech got in over Kansas State despite Kansas State having a better conference record, and Kansas State beating them by 21 in the conference tournament.
Awesomeness. Time to do some homework.
When you lose to Cal by 30, New Mexico by 24, and play in the much weaker division of the conference, you're not getting in. Also doesn't help that they only beat 3 tournament teams: Tech, USC, and Texas. Tech won the matchup in the regular season, played a much, much better in and out of conference schedule (beat Texas A&M twice) and also had to play a game the night before the KSU tourney game. Unfortunately for my favorite piece of shit coach in college basketball, the KSU football scheduling philosophy (cupcake central) will screw you over in college basketball.Originally Posted by Byrd
Never compare conference records in a non balanced conference schedule without looking at the strength of schedule.
I understand that, but I still feel the whole "Beat them 3 days ago by 21 on a neutral court" should tell you who is playing better.Originally Posted by edgarfigaro
This is by far the best job the committee has done in terms of bubble teams in my recent memory. The only ones I’d have differently is to have Drexel in place of either Stanford or Arkansas. I applaud them leaving Syracuse and Air Force out. I have been arguing for nearly 3 weeks that Syracuse should not have been the lock that every media writer put them as. Their RPI was far too low in comparison to other bubble teams and I believe they did not play a single road game in the non-conference. Air Force ruined their chances by losing their last 4 games in a mid-major conference.
NC State is playing better than 90% of the teams in the tournament, they still didn't deserve to get in. Plus, again, tech had to play a game the night before...I'd put more stock into the victory if both teams had been fully rested.Originally Posted by Byrd
Bottom line, the commitee sent a msg to the major conference teams: playing a shitty non-conference schedule and getting an easy conference schedule isn't a ticket to the Big Dance. Maybe Syracuse will leave the state of New York before conference play next year...though Boehim is such a ninny I doubt it. Of course, they also sent a msg to the mid majors...no matter how many times you play and win on the road against the majors, you'll get bumped by a mediocre major team that happens to win 2-3 games in their conference tournament.
UNC shut state the fuck up, finally I hate state more than any other ACC school, including Dook. Ehhh maybe that's going too far.
ACC Champs bitches!
Originally Posted by BarthelloSylph
LOL I was about to say. In an semi-unrealted story, I once had a teacher who graduated from Duke a few years prior, anyway on our college finals she made an extra credit question that said...
(True)
(False)
Duke is better than Carolina.
I wrote "Tarheels baby! Fuck duke"
I got 20 extra credit points for "Keeping it real"