Athens Greece's obsession with having sex with younger men i here?Originally Posted by Angelsin
Athens Greece's obsession with having sex with younger men i here?Originally Posted by Angelsin
Jesus, some people just need to watch the movie a second time to understand it. It's okay, it happens and I sometimes do it myself but oh god, lol this thread.
i wonder what parental rating the movie would be given? /b/? hahOriginally Posted by Ace-o-fire
Your lack of intelligence.Originally Posted by Some idiot
Originally Posted by kuronosan
Talk about irony
WhooshOriginally Posted by kuronosan
If you have a legitimate gripe about the filmography of the movie, then ROCK ON. If you didn't like the lighting, or the plot or the writing ROCK ON. If you bitch about historical accuracy then you are a goddamned sexual intellectual moron who clearly missed the point of the movie. If you try to find political undertones to cry about, well like I said before you can find Jesus in a jar of olives if you bullshit yourself enough.
Edit: Ok, for all you history buffs, when you saw 8 ft tall Xerxes with gold body paint did that not clue you in that you were in a place of entertainment rather than a classroom? Or how about the elephants the size of three story houses? WHOOSH Those two things alone should have given you the impression that you were listening to a fantastic, over-the-top exaggerated retelling of the battle by a wounded soldier who was sent home to prepare for the next battle. Jesus.
You don't have to go THAT far, the movie's tag line is: "They were 300 vs an army of one million." <_<Originally Posted by Melchiah
I thought the movie was very entertaining, and it was well worth the 10 bucks I paid. Also, I knew what I was getting into when I went to see this movie. I just wanted to see people fight and shit. Oh, and I don't know who Mark Miller is and I intend to keep it that way ;o
Frank Miller. The guy who saved Batman from being a homo in tights who keeps an underage boy in a cave. The guy who gave us Sin City. The guy who inspired Samurai Jack.Originally Posted by Meteora
Yeah, not worth knowing, right?![]()
Sin city was amazing but I kinda fell out of the samurai jack universe , wish i hadn't ;;Originally Posted by Huggo
You are no longer allowed to have an opinion.[/quote]Originally Posted by Creeps
LOL
Actually: I saw that as PERFECT historical accuracy, and I'm not being sarcastic.Originally Posted by Melchiah
3 story. 2 tusked beasts of war.
one-horned demons [rhino]
Ogres
Their king is 8 feet tall and shines like gold.
Every Persian tent has 2-5 girls making out with random people/things.
They have a goat that plays the clarinet for the king.
Their arrows are so think they blot out the sun.
Spartans kill everything and make awesome one-liners.
What do all of these elements have in common?
It's a perfectly historically accurate representation of how the Greeks would have told this story themselves.
At that time period, Stories were told like that, That was the writing style of the era. If your enemy had developed Gunpowder and you hadn't, you said they had magic, And sorcerers that could create fire in the midst of a battlefield, throwing you asunder. If your enemy was stronger, They were 4 meters tall! and so on.
The movie was about mostly naked men fighting waves of oncoming enemies. And as far as that goes, it does what it was meant to do.
First off: Who are you to judge or even tell if people are band-wagoning or if they're writing my own opinions. I wrote how I saw it.You guys don't know shit about Frank Miller's recent works.
It's far from his best. Stop creaming yourselves in the name of BG Bandwagonnery.
And let's not forget Frank Miller is also responsible for the writing for Robocop 2 AND 3.
I'm willing to think he's gotten better at screenwriting and his relationship with directors has improved since 1993, but there's a lot of brainless 'omg me too' douchebaggery writ dissenting opinions going on of late in General Disc. The second someone disagrees with you it's 'go die in a fire' or 'lol ur opninion sux gtfo.' Grow the fuck up, please.
You're right that I don't know shit about frank miller. In fact, I hated Sin City and saw almost no redeeming qualities in that film noir-mimic movie. I almost didn't see 300 because that was the only other time I'd heard the name "Frank Miller" I didn't know he did Robocop 2 and I didn't even realize they made a Robocop 3. How does that affect my view on 300? It doesn't. Not at all.
I walked into the theater to watch a movie, I walked out entertained. I logged in to BG, And the rest is history.
we make sexy time can now plz?Originally Posted by cassiraa
I really just wish they showed at the end the 43,000 Spartans & greece men clashing with the persians and then the movie would go off![]()
Cassiraa hit it pretty much right on the head. The movie was more of how the Spartans saw things at that point in history. The Spartans had never seen elephants, Asians or Xerxes, so of course they greatly exaggerated reality when they recorded their history. Some of you people need to pull your heads out of your asses and stop trying to be political scientists and shit.
Thank you. You get it.Originally Posted by cassiraa
Edit: I think a lot of people are missing the fact that 300 is being narrated by Aristodemus after having been sent home.
Go go Cass!![]()
I heard the Chicken Vindaloos at hell restaurant are really nice.
A naval battle scene from the greek time era would get old quick imo. Its arguably the strongest reason this battle was won. All I can imagine is 1 1/2hrs of ships ramming each other and trying to tear at each others oars XDOriginally Posted by Xajii
it purty much was.Originally Posted by Tyche
while we are all entitled to our own opinion, the fact remains that there is still a right and wrong answer... and the wrong one is that 300 was a bad movie.