DMC4 Coming to the 360 and PC

[Exoduso]

After watching that AC4 video, fuck the 360 version lol.

[Insanecyclone]

Looks like I'll be the only one geting the 360 version then.

[Boyiee]

EDIT: Regarding MGS4, Kojima already said he had no problems releasing the game on multiple discs. It's not like FF7 on 4 discs and the previous MGS games on multiple discs were failures.

wasn't there a thread a month or 2 ago about disc sizes between DVD/HDDVD/BDD, and how MGS4 was going to wait to be released on the higher capacity BDD's; meaning it would take like 6-8 DVD's for the entire game? lol. 4 Discs is alot, but anymore is too much.

[Deejay]

So who fucking cares? you get DMC4 on the 360... after thinking about it, since it will be developed separately, the PS3 version will still look better.

And you base this on what? How no ps3 game to date has looked better then games on the 360 or Capcom's extensive experience with the 360 whereas DMC will be the first game they do the for the PS3.

didn't read the rest of your post yet, might edit in more, but PS3 is leaps and bounds ahead of 360 in terms of looks for games that are designed for it and then ported: http://www.gametrailers.com/player.php? ... ov&pl=game <-- stolen from the AC4 thread.

The only difference is the freaking brightness.

[Exoduso]

So who fucking cares? you get DMC4 on the 360... after thinking about it, since it will be developed separately, the PS3 version will still look better.

And you base this on what? How no ps3 game to date has looked better then games on the 360 or Capcom's extensive experience with the 360 whereas DMC will be the first game they do the for the PS3.

didn't read the rest of your post yet, might edit in more, but PS3 is leaps and bounds ahead of 360 in terms of looks for games that are designed for it and then ported: http://www.gametrailers.com/player.php? ... ov&pl=game <-- stolen from the AC4 thread.

The only difference is the freaking brightness.

If all you notice is the brightness, then you're blind lol... sorry.

The game looks like some bad, graphically-retarded Xbox1 game in comparison to its PS3 counterpart.

[Boyiee]

So who fucking cares? you get DMC4 on the 360... after thinking about it, since it will be developed separately, the PS3 version will still look better.

And you base this on what? How no ps3 game to date has looked better then games on the 360 or Capcom's extensive experience with the 360 whereas DMC will be the first game they do the for the PS3.

didn't read the rest of your post yet, might edit in more, but PS3 is leaps and bounds ahead of 360 in terms of looks for games that are designed for it and then ported: http://www.gametrailers.com/player.php? ... ov&pl=game <-- stolen from the AC4 thread.

The only difference is the freaking brightness.

please put sarcasm tags in there or something before you are viewed as retarded

[PyramidHead]

wasn't there a thread a month or 2 ago about disc sizes between DVD/HDDVD/BDD, and how MGS4 was going to wait to be released on the higher capacity BDD's; meaning it would take like 6-8 DVD's for the entire game? lol. 4 Discs is alot, but anymore is too much.

Kojima was waiting for single-layer 50gb blu-ray discs before releasing MGS4, I'm not sure why though.

There's also a lot of largely unnecessary things driving up the amount of space the game is taking. I've read that he's leaving all the audio files uncompressed so that's taking up a significant chunk because of the great many Codec calls and such.

[Kazen]

So who fucking cares? you get DMC4 on the 360... after thinking about it, since it will be developed separately, the PS3 version will still look better.

And you base this on what? How no ps3 game to date has looked better then games on the 360 or Capcom's extensive experience with the 360 whereas DMC will be the first game they do the for the PS3.

didn't read the rest of your post yet, might edit in more, but PS3 is leaps and bounds ahead of 360 in terms of looks for games that are designed for it and then ported: http://www.gametrailers.com/player.php? ... ov&pl=game <-- stolen from the AC4 thread.

The only difference is the freaking brightness.

It was more than brightness lol, your graphic's card must suck.

[Deejay]

If all you notice is the brightness, then you're blind lol... sorry.

The game looks like some bad, graphically-retarded PS2 game in comparison to its PS3 counterpart.

Are you reading what you are saying? I cant believe YOU are pulling out the fanboy card on anyone.

edit:
The game looks good on PS3 and decent on Xbox. To argue that DMC or anything else for that matter will look way better on PS3 is retarded. Especially when the best looking games are on the 360, and the only real competition (graphically) wont be out for another year or two.

[aurik]

didn't read the rest of your post yet, might edit in more, but PS3 is leaps and bounds ahead of 360 in terms of looks for games that are designed for it and then ported: http://www.gametrailers.com/player.php? ... ov&pl=game <-- stolen from the AC4 thread.

It's not because PS3 > 360 or the other way around, it's because the game was written for one platform and then ported.

[Exoduso]

If all you notice is the brightness, then you're blind lol... sorry.

The game looks like some bad, graphically-retarded PS2 game in comparison to its PS3 counterpart.

Are you reading what you are saying? I cant believe YOU are pulling out the fanboy card on anyone.

Seriously? wow okay...

I'm just stating the obvious, on THIS PARTICULAR VIDEO the PS3 looks a lot better than 360 does... on other ported games, that came from 360 to the PS3, the 360 looked better.

It's all about where they are being ported from... just wait for some new games to come, that will be made for each system separately, and then we can compare.

And once again I don't care, I got both consoles so it doesn't really matter to me if you derail one or the other, i'm going to get the one that looks better IMO out of the two.

[Boyiee]

didn't read the rest of your post yet, might edit in more, but PS3 is leaps and bounds ahead of 360 in terms of looks for games that are designed for it and then ported: http://www.gametrailers.com/player.php? ... ov&pl=game <-- stolen from the AC4 thread.

It's not because PS3 > 360 or the other way around, it's because the game was written for one platform and then ported.

;3 yes, as was stated.

but it will be the same with dmc4 and the other games mentioned in this thread, just like how the new nba street game looks terrible on ps3, it wasn't designed for it. The games will look better on ps3, since they were written for it, so if graphics is a concern at all (especially with how drastic they are with the AC4 port) then ps3 is choice.

[SephYuyX]

A tiny graphics increase is not worth a 200$ difference though.

[Jeryhn]

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...nostriches.JPG

My answer to the great question is the only one that is logical and rational.

[aurik]

didn't read the rest of your post yet, might edit in more, but PS3 is leaps and bounds ahead of 360 in terms of looks for games that are designed for it and then ported: http://www.gametrailers.com/player.php? ... ov&pl=game <-- stolen from the AC4 thread.

It's not because PS3 > 360 or the other way around, it's because the game was written for one platform and then ported.

;3

but it will be the same with dmc4 and the other games mentioned in this thread, just like how the new nba street game looks terrible on ps3, it wasn't designed for it. The games will look better on ps3, since they were written for it, so if graphics is a concern at all (especially with how drastic they are with the AC4 port) then ps3 is choice.

it's necessarily true for every multiplatform game, the native platform is almost always the best (and yes every game has a native platform). I guess it just seems obvious to me when one says "hey games designed for ps3 and then farmed out look best on ps3", not really an incredible statement to be making.

[Boyiee]

A tiny graphics increase is not worth a 200$ difference though.

a better graphics card for your pc will probably run you at least 200$, is it worth it then? Plus if you already have the console, then it's no big deal. If you want the game earlier on too, the games mentioned should be out sooner on ps3 than on ports... and I know people would pay 200$ to play a game sooner.

edit:: most games that are multiplatform aurik, i rarely notice much difference in. NFS games for example, sports games... And Oblivion is better on ps3 (even though its native to 360)

[Kaylia]

Don't count on MGS4 moving to the 360 unless they don't mind sending it in packages of 5 dvd's.

Or slightly compress their music file to a quality most human won't see a difference, but 1/4 the size. I don't know what take so much space, but it's most likely compressable without losing much quality.

Metal gear solid has probably the best game programmer out there, if they port it, I'm sure it would be a port nearly as good as the original.

[Jefe]

Meh, DMC4, who cares? The first one was ok, the second one was shit, third was semi-ok, so don't give a crap about it. Besides, capcom is notorios for this type of shit. "I'd rather decapitate myself than porting RE 4 to the PS2," some crazy jap-capcom-re-mainprogramer said.

NOW, if MGS4 GOES TO ANY OTHER CONLOSE THAN PS3, THAT DAY, MY FRIENDS, JESUS WILL CRY... TEARS OF BLOOD!

[Exoduso]

Meh, DMC4, who cares? The first one was ok, the second one was shit, third was semi-ok, so don't give a crap about it. Besides, capcom is notorios for this type of shit. "I'd rather decapitate myself than porting RE 4 to the PS2," some crazy jap-capcom-re-mainprogramer said.

NOW, if MGS4 GOES TO ANY OTHER CONLOSE THAN PS3, THAT DAY, MY FRIENDS, JESUS WILL CRY... TEARS OF BLOOD!

That is the same day the world will explode, so there won't be any crying going on anymore.

[Semitry]

didn't read the rest of your post yet, might edit in more, but PS3 is leaps and bounds ahead of 360 in terms of looks for games that are designed for it and then ported: http://www.gametrailers.com/player.php? ... ov&pl=game <-- stolen from the AC4 thread.

As someone already pointed out, the only difference I notice is lightning. It's hard to tell with that small vid. I really don't understand how you 2 can come to a conclusion from that tiny video Screen shots and first hand experience is best here.

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread. ... 409&page=4

basically sums things up : PS3 textures are cleaner, but mech is quite jaggie, lighting isn't as pronounced. X360 textures look murkier (or more AA'ed) , no jaggies, lighting is more pronounced.

At the end of the day - the major difference is the frame rate - and that's not going to show up in shots. X360 is overall smoother and has a higher frame rate. Will be nice if AC4 is patched to fix the PS3 version, but it would be a first. :/

I'll take better frame rates over cleaner textures.

but it will be the same with dmc4 and the other games mentioned in this thread, just like how the new nba street game looks terrible on ps3, it wasn't designed for it. The games will look better on ps3, since they were written for it, so if graphics is a concern at all (especially with how drastic they are with the AC4 port) then ps3 is choice.

I don't believe DMC4 is ported to the 360, if anything they developed it on the 360 first then ported it over to the PS3 incrementally since they have a much better grasp with the 360 then the PS3.

-AC4 and Oblivion look better on the PS3 than the 360, which shows that if a game is being made for the PS3 instead of being ported over from the 360, it WILL look better on the PS3 than the 360 (having an HDMI cable helps this cause, and I still believe the PS3 is stronger than the 360, even if you use component cables on both)...all the games that are multiplatform this far are games that have been made for the 360 for the past couple of months, and were just ported over to the PS3 because it was an easy transition... which means it was easy money for them.

AC4 is debatable since it has not been released. As the developers have already said Oblivion looks better only because of the extra time they had to develop it and not because of the hardware.

Regarding MGS4/FF13, we'll see. From comments by Kojima and Konami's past, I'd bet MGS4 will be ported eventually. FF13 probably not unless the PS3 keeps selling like crap. They're not stupid enough to release a 30m budget game to a 10m user base.

And I've been a nintendo fanboy ever since the NES! Even through the N64/GC era lol.