Eh, maybe I haven't lived in America long enough; where I come from they would laugh at marriage being a Christian institution on its' own, sorry for the discrepancy.
Eh, maybe I haven't lived in America long enough; where I come from they would laugh at marriage being a Christian institution on its' own, sorry for the discrepancy.
No, there is actually a term that refers to it. Marriage in a church is what is practiced in most states that allow gay marriage which makes no sense, the logical process would be marriage by a judge, not a priest/pastor/whatever denomination you are..Originally Posted by Tricen
American marriage is far from Christian. Any country where this so called "Holy, Eternal Union" can be done while drunk with your friend in Vegas and annulled 55 hrs later is far from Christian. As far as I'm concerned, gay people have as much right to be stuck in a miserable, loveless arrangement as much as the straight people do.Originally Posted by Maguspk
Originally Posted by Maguspk
you do realize this is what I just saidOriginally Posted by Maguspk also
reading ftw?Originally Posted by Post he's referring to
I agree. But the idea of forcing a law to allow Christian marriage for gay couples is what angers me. Seperation of church and state is what half of these people argue for, but they somehow want gay marriages in churches which is just stupid.Originally Posted by Lauzian
Gay marriage should be the union of two same sex idividuals who want to be seen in the eyes of the state as a married couple and reap the benefits of that status. That's all...
However this brings up the concept of sodomy being illegal in alot of states. Blowjobs, no. Ass sex, no. Vagina sex, ok! Ear Sex,?
What we'll do is, let gay people get married, but instead of calling it marriage, we'll call it... butt buddies. Then everyone will be happy!
I approve :wink:Originally Posted by Nuketwig
does legalizing gay marriage really force Christians to have gay marriages?
you can't forget ass-pirate, pillow-biter, or rump-ranger
haha just kidding, gay people don't bug me
so long as i'm not getting hit on they can bang and suck each other all they want.
lol this was just on /b/, semi relevant.
http://img454.imageshack.us/img454/3...1190000lr2.png
Why do people care if they get hit on by someone of the other sex? Just say no I am not interested. You make it sound like it's some deviant thing that as long as you aren't involved in, it's ok. What's so hard to accept? That two people love each other?Originally Posted by Bartylby
because being hit on by the opposite of sex makes me way too entirely uncomfortable? i said they DONT bother me.
you make it sound as if i drive around throwing empties screaming "homo and fag" at random people i "think" are gay.
gimme a break man lol
The fact that it bothers you, speaks volumes of you.Originally Posted by Bartylby
Edit: its alot like a chick you don't like hitting on you, you just don't care.
In all actuality I find it easier to deal with, because you can just say you don't swing that way. With an ugly chick you have to be a little more subtle, or maybe that's just me.Originally Posted by Kuya
do people even get past the first part of what i say?
i'll make it crystal clear for those who can't read in between the lines.
i'm not going into gay bars to hang out right, but if i see two guy's OR girls holding hands it doesn't bother me. if i see them kissing it doesn't bother me. ANY normal shit you see people of a gay nature doing that any hetero couple would do doesn't bother me.
if i get hit on by another guy, i would politely tell them i'm not interested in men. ( and YES it would make me uncomfortable on the inside and anyone that says otherwise is lieing ) i'm not gonna throw my drink in their face, i'm not gonna scream NO WAI FAG!!!!!!1 at them, and i am most certainly not gonna kick their ass cause they are gay.
their lifstyle choice is just that. their choice
anyone not satisfied by the way i typed this out obviously has too big a stick up their ass (no pun intended) to even care what i'm saying at this point so yea![]()
Thats a really good example of how ignorant people are when it comes to the bible.Originally Posted by Anyway
Edit: I was just gonna leave it at that but I have to get up early tomorrow, so to clarify:
God: yes, did cause the death to some ofthe enemies of his chosen people, yes he did strike down people who deliberitely(sp?) sinned against him.
Satan: Decieved Eve, causing her and Adam to sin, causing them to lose perfection and the prospect of living forever, and they then passed that on to their children(EVERYONE!). Satan is the reason we grow old and die, he is the reason death exits. Satan is the reason we all die.
Frig man, relevant? More like dillusional.
lol @ comparing
*I just brought it up to add to the topic lol sorry* But srsly, you need moar dots.Originally Posted by Bartylby
lol I use the same excuse, "sorry I don't swing that way, fatty."Originally Posted by Nuketwig
also FrogBoiler is righter than right.
it's cool lolOriginally Posted by Tricen
i joined the forums for shit like this anyways, and yes it's a well known fact my grammer sucks... hard
Hmm... If I am not mistaken, God created an eden for Adam, and later Eve. He deliberately put a "bad" thing in this eden and told Adam he could not touch. This "bad" thing was the tree of knowledge. Eve came along and wanted to better herself with this said knowledge, but because god did not tell her directly, she thought it was ok (and she's a girl, women are evil like that). Eve ate the apple and offered it to Adam who in turn ate it because he as a dumbass. So what is the moral of this story? God does not man or women to become knowledgeable. Apparently god cannot see into the future or into the minds of his creations. This proves god is not immaculate and omniscient.Originally Posted by FrogBoiler
EDIT: Before you flame or whatever, atleast think about it or take it into consideration.