need to cut off the last few pages of arguement and make a separate thread about gay/non-gay pride arguements. jesus, surprised the mod didnt do this yet.
One could argue that the victim in gay sex is the man getting penetrated, as he's having his manhood stripped away... just because he believes he is like a woman and should therefore receive the cock does not mean it's good for him. This is an objective fact.
A victim that partakes in his own undoing, if you will.
oshi, orgy. Let's run a train up in this motherfucker
http://c3.ac-images.myspacecdn.com/i...c85f44736a.png
Cyn, after this, I like you in a completely platonic way.
moar contributing
scars ftl
http://c4.ac-images.myspacecdn.com/i...91f5d82877.jpg
Or you can say that all men are inherently victims. Women use them as a living vibrator
Or you could be reasonable and say that all parties involved in consensual sexual activity are coming out on top. So to speak.
I don't think you're allowed to kill someone and eat their penis because it was consensual.
You know that know self respecting straight man would have so many pictures of himself, right CSoda?
But it's kind of sexy to see a black man drinking purple drank. Where do you live again?
Well, it coldn't possibally be st pete florida