PLEASE DON'T FUCKING RUIN HARRY POTTER 7 THANKS.

[Bartylby]

i'm doubtful of any spoilers until passed the release date.

the book is being printed in the dark, and it's gonna be shipped in boxes that are chained.

i agree with lbelle though... anyone that spoils this book deserves to die in a fire.

[Insanecyclone]

harry dies













actually idk just fucking with ya!

[HAcoreRD]

Ron dies.

Oops

[The_OG_Nelta]

Hey kids,
SNAPE DIES SO HARRY CAN KILL VOLDEMORT (OH AND THE LAST HORCRUX IS IN SIRIUS' HOUSE)

[Lexa]

That's why you don't watch the movies because they are shit compared to the books.

#3 was the shit.

Period.

[Xavier]

8. no, I don't like Harry Potter and are only reading them because I have to.

Sureee.

[Devek]

We have people trying to break into bookstores to steal books.. they want to read!

Say whatever you want about my country, but God bless America.

[ertyu]

Also, I prefer Terry Goodkind/Pratchett's version to Rowling's. (For the life of me I can't remember who does the original, I can't find the article anymore either.)

o m f g

I loooooooooove Terry Pratchett <3333333

Good Omens is and always will be my favorite book, and the discworld series was just brilliant. God I love him <3

[Sonomaa]

spoilers for the books will simply result in a nice ban from your forum addiction

[Ardrial]

spoilers for the books will simply result in a nice ban from your forum addiction

so ban senoska k?

[Ikith]

SNAPE KILLS DUMBLEDORE

[MF Perm]

SNAPE KILLS DUMBLEDORE

3 pages ago

[Resin]

spoilers for the books will simply result in a nice ban from your forum addiction

<3 you!

[Shuemue]

spoilers for the books will simply result in a nice ban from your forum addiction

Will it be a retrospective ban? Because Senoska and others are dropping 'spoilers' around, on IRC etc.

So if they turn out to have been genuine spoilers once it's released, will they get the stick?

[archibaldcrane]

spoilers for the books will simply result in a nice ban from your forum addiction

Will it be a retrospective ban ? Because Senoska and others are dropping 'spoilers' around, on IRC etc.

So if they turn out to have been genuine spoilers once it's released, will they get the stick?

Is that where noone is allowed to look back at all the things that have happened before in Harry Potter history?
you're looking for the word "retroactive"

[Shuemue]

spoilers for the books will simply result in a nice ban from your forum addiction

Will it be a retrospective ban ? Because Senoska and others are dropping 'spoilers' around, on IRC etc.

So if they turn out to have been genuine spoilers once it's released, will they get the stick?

Is that where noone is allowed to look back at all the things that have happened before in Harry Potter history?
you're looking for the word "retroactive"

Sure, retroactive is probably more fitting, but http://www.answers.com/retrospective&r=67 says my word wasn't horrible.

[Doombard]

I stopped reading the books after number 4.... was thinkin about just watchin the movies to finish it up, buuuuut... now I think I want to read the books more. Anyone know where I could find them available to read online?

[shirizaan]

As a side note, Senoska obviously doesn't take hints from karma

I assure you, if karma is real, spoiling a harry potter book is the least of my worries.

Like getting your car fucked up by a random motorcyclist?

[Vade]

Scans of the book are out. I only have the scans of the last chapter...I want to read them and so tempted but I think I'm going to wait...for at least a few more days. Don't post spoilers you assholes!

[Demosthenes11]

My friend and I are gonna hop in his truck the night this comes out and drive by Borders with a megaphone yelling "VOLDEMORT KILLS RON, PAGE 577!"

Wanna see how many people actually fall for it