I can see you don't. I tried reading this paragraph a couple times and, I'm assuming I just missed something and it has a point. You are trying to point out I somehow contradicted myself? And yet, I don't see anything that's doing that. Maybe you think I said a nation can't be divided in more than one way? (I guess you might be just sayingDo you even know what you're talking about anymore?
I guess I should repeat myself in a very short and to the point manner:
You can't really judge an entire nation to one "social level", especially in comparison to another nation(s). It's unlikely that there would be only one political platform/set of ideas shared among everyone in an entire nation. It becomes further divided among factions within these groups(example: extreme conservatism vs a middle-man). It becomes even more ridiculous when you consider the US has much more cultures than Japan does. You might be getting confused now, so let me back it up a bit. It was retarded the moment you compared the two(three) nations. Right now, I'm just going over just how stupid the comment was in all the ways I think of.
Moving on: I do not discount laws, but some people don't respect some laws as much as they would others. This being a prime example. Most people don't report offenders because they don't agree with it(Maybe they wouldn't be so surprised/against by the law with Japan). Yes, some people do get charged on this, but my point is if it was a big deal to Americans, the law would receive more respect... cases like the one mentioned wouldn't be so controversial.
Huh? I was referring to the entire Liberal agenda, which is usually most vocal on college campuses(and duh, also on any media outlet, not just one). Abortions, Death Penalty, and many other issues are so fiercely debated among two sides, that alone should be proof that you can't label an entire nation to one setting. Again, I'm pointing out how dumb the statement is.opinions of college students one certain media outlet?
I've read this whole thread... since you've originally posted you seem to try to look as mean and tough as possible. Half your posts being an actual response to the conversation(which I'll admit isn't nonsense) and the other half is a prime example of e-thugging. Apparently I'm not alone in this and usually I'm never agreed with(not so hard to tell), so I'm not just making it up.I say fuck once and you're calling me an e-thug
I didn't think you were against America exactly just by the one statement. You kind of just proved it by getting off topic with more America bashing. Now I don't really think you "hate" America, but I'd find it hard to believe you don't hold some enmity toward the nation(as not only a government, but also as a society) with the crap you are saying. To do so would kind of explain the comparing of two other nations, at least to me.And then, to clarify further, you took one link and one line of what I said and just decided to make a point that I'm all like FUCK AMERIKKKA I HATE WHITE PEOPLE AND MEN.
If I missed the context of your post, why are you debating against me on the subject I thought it was. If I read the whole thing wrong, shouldn't you be like "No, this is what I meant"? I think it's dumb to compare two nations in the manner you did... where I did go wrong?
Oh, I'm sure MFP is so hilarious. I mean his "SHOCKING" insults subtly inserted into his argument and over the top Maddox style detailing of exaggeration. Maybe one day, you'll have to the pleasure in disagreeing with him. Maybe then you'll realize what has in humor is lacks in sense and comprehension skills.
Oh, and apparently talking about my ban is like hanging a "Please ban me sign ->" next to my head, so I rather not, but as annoying as I'm sure people find me, I don't think I've ever said anything as absurd like "I won, so go hide, I'm the winner of this internet debate, *insult*". That really doesn't give you a bad feeling reading that? The thought "What exactly am I dealing with here" crossed my mind.
Sorry for the wall of text, this is going nowhere maybe we should stop, ect ect.
XI Wiki


