then don't argue the conspiracy Tyche, but then don't look for Absolute Proof. There is no such thing.
then don't argue the conspiracy Tyche, but then don't look for Absolute Proof. There is no such thing.
nutbags, what??Originally Posted by Gregorio
These so called "nutbags" know a hell of a lot more about everything 9/11 than 99% of the general population, the others just accept the official story and the bullshit mainstream media feeds them and thinks that anyone who believes other is crazy, wierd or whatever.
I never argued the conspriacy, I argued ideological flaw of comparing 3 different building with 3 different structures taking damage in 3 different places.Originally Posted by guartz
Oh, and WTC7 took about 15 seconds to fall
http://youtube.com/watch?v=G86yuunRBIw
I'm not even prepared to argue conspiracy or not lol. I know very little, and never really cared to research. Just what I've randomly heard. I said I wasn't arguing for/against conspiracy, just that video/pictural evidence is easily debunked. Like I said, it takes a whole 10 seconds to find evidence to support any theory regarding 9/11.
that was easily the stupidest video I've ever seen.
Need a BG Forums Hall of Shame for people like Guartz. Account is three whole days old and he has spewed nothing but spam and widely discredited rubbish about 9/11 conspiracies into General. Takes a special kind of kid to make 100% of your posts useless.
discredited by pretty much the mainstream media only, you honest to god haven't got s fucking breeze what you're talking aboutOriginally Posted by Correction
More armchair engineers?
..if the official report is wrong why don't you write your own report and use empirical evidence to show how bombs took down wtc7?
I wanna know what types of bombs were used, where they were placed, and how they affected the structure causing a collapse.
Discredited by Materials Science and Photographed evidence gathered by people actually at the scene, more like it.Originally Posted by Erza
Steel melting? Nobody says it did. Steel at the temperatures that Jet Fuel burns at (plus everything else burning in the WTC) loses 75% of its strength. That's sufficient weakening to cause a collapse.
http://www.outokumpu.com/33342.epibrw
Plane vanishing? More like exploding into debris spread over an enormous area, not obviously visible from a lot of crash photos/footage because there was *gasp* a fire and emergency crews everywhere trying to clean up and rescue survivors.
http://www.loosechangeguide.com/lcg2.html
But yeah, keep that 'you don't know crap' attitude up, sooner or later I'm sure you'll bring the real perpetrators to justice, instead of using your conspiracy theory as a prop to attack people on irrelevant matters.![]()
I think the problem is that we use science and clear logic with these people.
Maybe we would have better luck if we threw out education and just used propaganda and la la land theories to prove they are wrong. This is the type of thinking they are used to and maybe this will connect with them.
Here goes:
At 9:02 a.m. CST, the Ryder truck, which contained about 5,000 pounds (2,300 kg) of fertilizer and nitromethane mixture packed into the back, detonated in front of the north side of the nine-story Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building. The blast destroyed a third of the building and created a thirty-foot (9 m) wide, eight-foot (2.4 m) deep crater on NW 5th Street next to the building. The blast destroyed or damaged 324 buildings in a sixteen-block radius, destroyed or burned 86 cars around the site, and shattered glass in 258 nearby buildings (the broken glass alone accounted for 5% of the death total and 69% of the injuries outside the Murrah Federal building). The destruction of the building left several hundred people homeless and shut down multiple offices in downtown Oklahoma City.
The effects of the blast were equivalent to 4,000 lbs (1,814 kg) of TNT, and could be heard and felt up to fifty-five miles (89 km) away. Seismometers at the Omniplex Museum in Oklahoma City (4.3 miles/7 kilometers away) and in Norman, Oklahoma (16.1 miles/26 kilometers away) recorded the blast as measuring approximately 3.0 on the Richter scale.
http://img528.imageshack.us/img528/2...ingdfsthm8.jpg http://img528.imageshack.us/img528/9...gaerialdv3.jpg
I was 20 min away from this in school when this bomb went off, I could feel it shake my classroom and so did everyone else.
As you can see, American built buildings are very strong. They can not be taken down by a simple bomb and this bomb was strong enough to register a 3.0 on the Richter scale 16.1 miles away. When WTC7 fell there wasn't a 3.0 on the Richter scale at the site much less 16 miles away.
This is proof that the 911 conspiracy is a conspiracy by the government to make them look capable and stronger than they actually are.
Originally Posted by guartz
http://i73.photobucket.com/albums/i2...a/RabbiLOL.jpg