
Originally Posted by
Wolfknight
I am pretty sure it's not that clean cut, and not nearly that favor of turban. that's really inaccurate statement at for example at 70% acc and 44% haste[march/spell/byakko/swift/dusk x2+askar so 45 when turban], askar acc[only ignoring fstr] is improvement 2.18% increase in dmg, while haste is 1.85% increase in dmg, So ya Askar > turban in most cases, though for more comparsion at 85% acc and only 33% haste[no march, only spell same as above], Acc is 1.7% increase while haste is 1.4% increase, so ya unless pretty high acc and haste, so Again askar > turban. Even at 90% acc you'd need 44% haste for Askar to become slightly worse.
Edit: I am assumung GA for askar giving 3 acc thus 1.5% hit rate increase, my numbers aren't accurate for DWing.