Dark Rider Damaged?!

[divisortheory]

Glad I leave such a lasting impression on you folks Funny though that I only asked a simple question on the talk page and it was interepreted as me having wrote the article. Oh wait, forgot nobody here knows what talk pages are because whenever they want to make an edit to the wiki they just PM me directly asking me if I can do it for them.

But Divsiortheory put it on ffxiclopedia, it must be true.

Learn to read, champ.

[Khamsin]

Glad I leave such a lasting impression on you folks Funny though that I only asked a simple question on the talk page and it was interepreted as me having wrote the article. Oh wait, forgot nobody here knows what talk pages are because whenever they want to make an edit to the wiki they just PM me directly asking me if I can do it for them.

But Divsiortheory put it on ffxiclopedia, it must be true.

Learn to read, champ.

Given that I spelled your name exactly that way everytime I wrote it, you should realize I'm just poking fun at the misspelling, not you.

[Healer]

People who post under any name other then their main char's name lose not only at ffxi but at life as well.

[evilpaul]

Did you guys hear that Dark Rider drops PUP relic hands which have an Enhances Martial Arts trait!?

[Fridell]

Found it already:

viewtopic.php?f=2&t=11603&st=0&sk=t&sd=a&hilit=BLU +solo+Dark+Rider

http://www.cactusleaftl.com/ffxipics/fakedrkill.jpg

Quick! To the wiki!

thread owns

Pii is in my Dynamis LS, lol i never saw that screenshot hahaha.

[pii]

Yeah I faked this like 1 year ago :D
I lol'ed when I saw this topic.

[Tonko]

fake fake blah blah banished

[Rocl]

I thought he was defeated once by a BLU who used Voracious Trunk to remove his invulnerability. --Divsiortheory 14:51, 23 February 2007 (EST)

Don't questions need one of these ?

Also, one could correctly assume that this quote is what caused "Cannot be harmed unless Voracious Trunk is used."- right? But of course, our only proof is an admitted fake screenshot... yet it was still up to this day.

Let's see- original thread was August, 2006. (PS: If you read the thread, you should see people questioning your sanity when you believed the obvious fake) You posted this on the wiki on February 2007, 6 months after the thread.

I'd say this thread is more about your stupidity than the wiki's.

[divisortheory]

I thought he was defeated once by a BLU who used Voracious Trunk to remove his invulnerability. --Divsiortheory 14:51, 23 February 2007 (EST)

Don't questions need one of these ?

Also, one could correctly assume that this quote is what caused "Cannot be harmed unless Voracious Trunk is used."- right? But of course, our only proof is an admitted fake screenshot... yet it was still up to this day.

Let's see- original thread was August, 2006. (PS: If you read the thread, you should see people questioning your sanity when you believed the obvious fake) You posted this on the wiki on February 2007, 6 months after the thread.

I'd say this thread is more about your stupidity than the wiki's.

Yet the actual article wasn't even updated to include that until 6 months after I wrote that.

And let's not forget how "I think" is obviously a very strong assertion filled with lots of conviction. This just in folks! Everyone who isn't sure about something and emphasizes that by using words like "I think" is a complete idiot!

And let's also not forget that someone else updating wiki articles and not putting a verification tag based on someone else saying "I think" is obviously a sign of a completely different person's stupidity.

Yea...

Don't questions need one of these ?

Way to mean absolutely nothing.

[Rocl]

The question mark was a reference to you saying you posted a question, when it cleary wasn't. You weren't sure of your statement, but it wasn't a question.

So some poor schmuck comes along and decides to believe what you say and puts it in. Alright, yeah fault of a wiki, but still he got this glorious idea from you. Nonetheless, I still don't see how you could begin to believe the original screenshot, that's what makes you freaking retarded. I mean, even at that time, you were some sort of experience player right? You had lv4 dagger (as pointed out in the thread), yet you couldn't see past a simple joke?

[Ryko]

I've had this dicussion before >_>

Edit: Twice

viewtopic.php?p=284885#p284885

viewtopic.php?f=31&t=18665&p=572666&hilit=Rider#p5 72666

[divisortheory]

So some poor schmuck comes along and decides to believe what you say and puts it in.

By some poor schmuck you mean the person with more edits on the entire wiki than anyone else. Poor schmuck indeed, I'm sure he's not familiar with what types of things to believe and what not to believe, and when to use a verification tag.

Alright, yeah fault of a wiki, but still he got this glorious idea from you.

Got it, anytime person A states that something is true when they got the idea from person B who said they aren't sure if it's true, person B is an idiot. ::taking notes::

Nonetheless, I still don't see how you could begin to believe the original screenshot, that's what makes you freaking retarded. I mean, even at that time, you were some sort of experience player right? You had lv4 dagger (as pointed out in the thread), yet you couldn't see past a simple joke?

Mommy!!! Rocl's hurting my feelings

[Charitwo]

So some poor schmuck comes along and decides to believe what you say and puts it in.

By some poor schmuck you mean the person with more edits on the entire wiki than anyone else. Poor schmuck indeed, I'm sure he's not familiar with what types of things to believe and what not to believe, and when to use a verification tag.

Far be it from me to place something on an article I never knew was "altered", I was glancing over the talk page as I formatted the article and saw the line about "Cannot be harmed in any way etc" and it conflicted with the discussion on the talk page. Yea, I should have put a verification tag, because 1 claim is hardly enough evidence. Nobody's perfect. You guys should worry less on bashing people and more on intelligent conversation.

[Rocl]

So some poor schmuck comes along and decides to believe what you say and puts it in.

By some poor schmuck you mean the person with more edits on the entire wiki than anyone else. Poor schmuck indeed, I'm sure he's not familiar with what types of things to believe and what not to believe, and when to use a verification tag.

And people ask why the wiki is made fun of?

Alright, yeah fault of a wiki, but still he got this glorious idea from you.

Got it, anytime person A states that something is true when they got the idea from person B who said they aren't sure if it's true, person B is an idiot. ::taking notes::

Yes? If you believe someone is telling the truth when they aren't even sure they're telling the truth, and they admit they're not sure they're telling the truth, then you're pretty freaking dumb.

Nonetheless, I still don't see how you could begin to believe the original screenshot, that's what makes you freaking retarded. I mean, even at that time, you were some sort of experience player right? You had lv4 dagger (as pointed out in the thread), yet you couldn't see past a simple joke?

Mommy!!! Rocl's hurting my feelings

I'm sorry you still need your mother to console you.
Also, they removed gullible from the dictionary, you should probably go post that on a wiki talk page.

[divisortheory]

Yes? If you believe someone is telling the truth when they aren't even sure they're telling the truth, and they admit they're not sure they're telling the truth, then you're pretty freaking dumb.

Funny how you seem to have totally misread what I said, but backed me up nonetheless in your explanation. And I'm the stupid one

[Rocl]

Yes? If you believe someone is telling the truth when they aren't even sure they're telling the truth, and they admit they're not sure they're telling the truth, then you're pretty freaking dumb.

Funny how you seem to have totally misread what I said, but backed me up nonetheless in your explanation. And I'm the stupid one

The editor is still at fault, like I said. He shouldn't of believed a total moron. In this particular case, both person A, and person B are dumb. Just because someone believed you doesn't make you any less of a moron.

[Ryko]

Also, they removed gullible from the dictionary, you should probably go post that on a wiki talk page.

http://i22.photobucket.com/albums/b3...t/gullible.jpg

I heard about it on the interblag, it's gotta be true.

[Charitwo]

Rocl never fails to let his age show in arguments.

[Rocl]

Rocl never fails to let his age show in arguments.

So you're saying this is no fault of yours?

[Charitwo]

Perhaps you should re-read this page and try again.