Public opinion: Is dynamis too expensive?

[Yutuyu]

And your point is moot, because everyone can, right now. Only thing a 1 million fee really stops is a huge surge of new LSes. Or a huger surge of new LSes anyway.

And it would keep older linkshells from having to do pay run/city runs to fund CoP.

That's great, considering LSes would HAVE to do CoP, because everywhere else be clusterfucked even more.

Which is why I've continually supported the idea of only changing the price/entry item for CoP Dynamises, which you would've seen had you actually bothered to read more than that post!

[Yutuyu]

More demand because of upgrading Relic Armor?

As it stand on my server, it's about 200k to upgrade a piece of armor. 200k isn't a barrier at all to endgamers. So your theory of demand rising because of people upgrading more Relic Armor doesn't make much sense...if anything demand would rise because more people would upgrade Relic Weapons.

Because if they lowered the cost on entering CoP Dynamises, people would actually be able to attain Relic -1 reasonably. Right now very few linkshells bother to do CoP Dynamis and even fewer of them do them regularly. Not much -1 = not much being upgraded, very basic common sense.

[Deftscythe]

Dynamis isn't instanced and on a lot of servers it's already a pain to find a convenient time to go where any zone will be free, let alone whichever one you were planning to do.

[BRP]

And your point is moot, because everyone can, right now. Only thing a 1 million fee really stops is a huge surge of new LSes. Or a huger surge of new LSes anyway.

And it would keep older linkshells from having to do pay run/city runs to fund CoP.

That's great, considering LSes would HAVE to do CoP, because everywhere else be clusterfucked even more.

Which is why I've continually supported the idea of only changing the price/entry item for CoP Dynamises, which you would've seen had you actually bothered to read more than that post!

...what?

You just attempted to justify a price drop on (all) Hourglasses. That is what I am responding to(and what you originally responded to). Your previous posts are utterly irrelevant and do not warrant being read.

[Yutuyu]

Yeah, I agree, it'd be a problem for the cities/Xarcabard, if you ask me. Which is why I like the idea others suggested about a seperate/half cost item for the CoP zones, that would fix things fine in my opinion.

Not even half a page up!

[BRP]

Yeah, I agree, it'd be a problem for the cities/Xarcabard, if you ask me. Which is why I like the idea others suggested about a seperate/half cost item for the CoP zones, that would fix things fine in my opinion.

Not even half a page up!

I repeat: It's irrelevant. If you had quoted me and said something like that, then whatever point you are trying to make could be true.

[Yutuyu]

Yeah, I agree, it'd be a problem for the cities/Xarcabard, if you ask me. Which is why I like the idea others suggested about a seperate/half cost item for the CoP zones, that would fix things fine in my opinion.

Not even half a page up!

I repeat: It's irrelevant. If you had quoted me and said something like that, then whatever point you are trying to make could be true.

Silly me, expecting people participating in the discussion to actually see what's been said before they start talking. I'll have to make sure not to make that assumption again with you.

[BRP]

/facepalm...

Let me try just one more time:

And it would keep older linkshells from having to do pay run/city runs to fund CoP.

In this sentence you are saying "Dropping the price of the hourglass would keep older linkshells from having to do pay run/city runs to fund CoP". Do you not get why? 1) This entire series quotes had nothing to do with your previous opinion; 2) you are adding onto my sentence.

It can not be clearer than this, please understand it by now. You can't fault me for you having an opinion that has nothing to do with the conversation at hand. It doesn't even make sense.

[Yutuyu]

/facepalm...

Let me try just one more time:

And it would keep older linkshells from having to do pay run/city runs to fund CoP.

In this sentence you are saying "Dropping the price of the hourglass would keep older linkshells from having to do pay run/city runs to fund CoP". Do you not get why? 1) This entire series quotes had nothing to do with your previous opinion; 2) you are adding onto my sentence.

It can not be clearer than this, please understand it by now. You can't fault me for you having an opinion that has nothing to do with the conversation at hand. It doesn't even make sense.

Huh, I actually see your point.