
Originally Posted by
Tekki
If everyone was on the same plane as the top tiered Dynamis players, we wouldn't be having this discussion. Sure some sped can be "pont and kill" told by a leader to win a city zone, but only the best are going pull off a successful dynamis rounds where everything is paid for, produce a profit to pay for non-coinage zones, pull lots of AF out of any zone and take advantage of absolutely everything Dynamis has to offer, including DL farms, wins, relics, CoP/Tav zone runs, etc.
There is a clear difference between people who are simply playing in Dynamis zones and those who are taking complete and full advantage of everything Dynamis has to offer. People who don't do this will complain about costs and drop rate. The only thing the better players complain about is time slots taken from trash LSs wasting a zone.
The bottom line is this. If the cost of dynamis is in question with your group, you are doing something wrong. I repeat, YOU ARE DOING SOMETHING WRONG. If you are not using dynamis resources to pay for the runs themselves, then you are doing it wrong. If you agree to this arguement, then the only other argument I can come up with is that the 1m bled out of the system per run needs to be countered with more gil producing methods brought along by SE.
Another thing to add. What IF they bring down the price... Lets say 750k... 500k.... What then? Based on some arguments (the only valid one in this thread) you are STILL bleeding the system by large quantities of gil... just at a slower rate. Lets say they do this at the end of August. Then guess what? In November we will still be evaluating the same problem, yet again.
The case should be closed on the dynamis costs at this point. It seems to me that a large majority of the "Yes reduce cost" votes are simply not thinking this out. The problem is not where they think it is.
Again, I'll reiterate my point.
I'm for whatever Squenix will keep the playerbase playing as long as possible. If the majority of linkshells are unable to maintain a strict dynamis fund, then they should change it. If the majority of players are able to maintain a dynamis fund regularly to pay for all the zones, then keep it. Dynamis itself is a static event - it doesn't change. Just because one linkshell is super fantastic at clearing everything in a zone doesn't make that the average. It's not about your linkshell. Nor is it about the stupid little flash-in-the-pan linkshells that have cockblocked our linkshell's fucking Saturday and preventing us from doing any fucking zone as they sit in there for 1.5 hours and ruin everybody's day (fucking Hades). It shouldn't be catered to either group; but instead what the average linkshell can accomplish in that time.
I don't think this is unreasonable. And for what it's worth, I think the average dyna-linkshell is able to sustain itself. It's really not that hard to. Which brings me to my other point:
Dynamis is not a top-tier event for top-tier players. Just because you're really good at something does not justify it as being top-tier. You could be Tiger Woods, and at the end of the day, you're still playing golf. Are we really at the point now where we're accepting golf as an awesome, entertaining sport, full of challenge and skill? :D