Rydiu your IQ is way too high
Rydiu your IQ is way too high
I know![]()
Quick, what alphanumeric character comes next in the following sequence:Originally Posted by rydiu
8 0 0 8 _
way to define your own words. have you ever met a competent doctor, lawyer, accountant, bus driver, cook? i bet most of them couldn't have been called the same thing 3 years before they graduated high school.Originally Posted by rydiu
competence is having skill and knowing how to apply it. by acquiring skills you didn't have before or through simple experience someone can learn to be competent.
I wasn't defining my own words I was using the standard definition and making it easier for others to understand....paraphrasing.
You're taking the argument further away from the point...I'm not trying to argue over semantics, this is about fairness.
If you want to argue semantics, I win. To be a competent doctor/lawyer/etc you first need to gain the skills of your profession through experience. No doctor or lawyer gets to practice on their own without first getting some experience with people who've already done it. These people were all first competent at the english language, then gained competence in other areas which led to their expert skill.
Clearly competence is something that you need in order to aquire new skills. Take a look:
Originally Posted by Merriam-Webster's Dictionary
Fuck beat me to it... Seriously read or try to make your posts understood without trying to look like a hyprocrite.Originally Posted by layoneil
Also you can be a competent player and still be a fucking dumbass. =|
"Ideally" and "The way things are"/"Practically" are almost never the same....
Think outside the box anyone?
Hi there!Originally Posted by EssEnnKay
5Originally Posted by divisortheory
I don't get it D:Originally Posted by aurik
Think outside the box then, because that was the right answer
That chick has great 80085 !!Originally Posted by Carnusty
Fuck that took me so long to grasp
you're arguing over semantics because you contradicted yourself. competence doesn't mean anything unless you specify what they are competent at. no one is universally "competent".Originally Posted by rydiu
which is why your first definition "Competence is not something you develop.. its something you already have." completely fails.
oh really?Originally Posted by rydiu
clearly the Japanese have no competent doctors/lawyers/etc since they are not competent at the english language. you fail at semantics.Originally Posted by rydiu
---
and i'll stop with the semantics and just slam the door in your face
Originally Posted by rydiu
if you're not there than you do not have the capacity to function, which makes you about as incompetent as they come.4 : having the capacity to function or develop in a particular way
you don't need 100% attendance but they definitely have something to do with each other.
Is it so terrible to admit when you are wrong when argueing on the internet? I find that 99% of the time when somebody states their IQ and cites dictionary definitions they are most likely wrong and resort to argueing side topics instead of the main point.
Now you're just making no sense....obviously Japanese professionals are first competent at the Japanese language.
You have just committed what is known as a non sequitur. You're argument is taking random directions in an attempt to cover up flaws in your own logic...
There actually is a "universal competence" and it has to do with command of one's native language. See definition 3.Originally Posted by layoneil
I stated my IQ to kill the poor kids retard argument because I'm quite sick of people throwing that word around so recklessly. Its quite lame.Originally Posted by Merriam-Webster's Dictionary
I am not very intellectual but I fixed ur post to suit your high IQfullstopOriginally Posted by rydiu
Rydiu wasn't saying that his arguement was retarded, she was speaking of his arguement asserting that rydia was a retard, so her usuage could be appropriate.Originally Posted by Reapz
No, you didn't fix it....
Sorry, I'd rather take 18 competent players with hectic real life schedules over 64 incompetent leeches who only show up to get items and contribute nothing but attendance numbers. All points prove is that one person is there more than another. It doesn't prove anything else but a statistic. Logically you can deduce that the higher the statistic the more dedicated the player is to the linkshell, but you can only come to this conclusion if you ignore the variable known as real life committments.
I wouldn't care if someone got more than I did if they showed up more because frankly they will probably play more and thus get more use out of it than I would... but to say that makes them more dedicated is a fallacy.