
Originally Posted by
Amele

Originally Posted by
Nameless

Originally Posted by
Lhexh
I go salvage as WAR/NIN with GAxe, I will NEVER use any sub other than that in Salvage because consistent damage mitigation, especially on Chariots, is more important since I co-tank every boss as WAR. NIN sub is just as viable as /DRK,/SAM,/DRG for WAR even with GAxe, for all the same reasons it was viable for MNKs pre-update.
Point of mine is, if you want to /nin and do consistant damage, why don't you DW? Are you really doing more damage /nin with GA than DW? I am not sure if I am on crazy pill, but the last time I check, DW shines on DoT and offers consistant damage thus you tank LBC with Mnk/nin.
You are just not getting the point. It really is why would you use GA when /nin when you can DW and do more consistant and better damage? /sam is what makes GA shine and do more than DW, with /nin, DW still do better.
lhexh addressed damage comparisons already.
you use gaxe war/nin on chariots because it generates less TP for the damage it deals. (it's why monk/nin is so good for tanking them.) and /nin will actually mitigate a significant amount of the damage they can deal
Well, if you are talking about giving mob less tp then yes, it has a purpose then and I understand that. But truely, I really doubt it does more damage. And obviously if you are tanking LBC, /nin is the choice, you just don't tank with /sam regardless what weapon you are using.
But we are kinda talking about extreme situation here aren't we? I can tell you pld/rdm is good for tanking JoL, but is it better than pld/nin in most situation? probably not. The point being in most situation, War/sam with GA > War/nin with DW > War/nin with GA. But again, if you can show parse result on merit that War/nin with GA > War/nin with DW, I will accept the defeat and change my opinion. As I said, so far the parses are showing that it is not the case, of course the parses after the 9/11 update.