Russia builds "Most powerful bombs"

[AlexRuzhyo]

I predict the next bomb will be named "The Mother In-Law of All Bombs".

It will scare the Russkies shitless.

[Kaylia]

I was reading this thread, until quartz started to quote Wikipedia as a credible source.

Congratulations on quoting a publicly created, entirely changeable source. I can't fucking stand when people say, "WELL IT'S ON THE WIKI, IT MUST BE TRUE!!!!!".

Wikipedia article are usually better than most encyclopedia, who can also be biased when it come to subjective point. Bashing wikipedia because it can be edited by anyone is stupid too.

You can verify the information using the source at the bottom of the page generally.

[Rigor]

it's tru tho, its totally his fault. Russia was just gonna chill, out of the picture.

Prove this point or just stop fucking posting forever.

ah lulz, you are such an angry person.

Ok, first you prove to me when has Russia initiated aggression towards U.S ?

Answer: Never.

United States always picked fights with russia, starting in early 1900s with Wilson.

Let's see who needs to stop posting forever.

Oh wait, I know what you are thinking!

Cuban Missile crisis? Oh wait.. that was just a response to U.S putting nukes in Georgia. (the country)

Oh wait, vietnam? Russians were suppling the weapons and the vietnamese attacked American ships?
NO WAIT. Gulf of Tonkin Incident was a fraud! US staged the event to go to war.
Even Wikipedia says so now.

What about that time when American troops invaded russia to battle bolshaviks, during the russian revolution?


Clearly, throughout history Russia has been very aggressive towards U.S - I concede my point, dear sir. You brainwashed propaganda is clearly superior to my knowledge.

Yes, yes. America is a horrible world power hell bent on world domination, and Russia is the benevolent hope for all of mankind. Gosh Darnit why can't we just leave those poor Russians alone!

You wanna know why Russia hasn't instigated many conflicts with the U.S.? Because they'd lose, like they did the last time. They came to us on their hands and knees begging for aide and we gave it, thats not something they are likely to forget.

When Russia leaves the countries around them alone, the big bad U.S. will most likely stop bullying them.

[Anderian]

it's tru tho, its totally his fault. Russia was just gonna chill, out of the picture.

Prove this point or just stop fucking posting forever.

ah lulz, you are such an angry person.

Ok, first you prove to me when has Russia initiated aggression towards U.S ?

Answer: Never.

United States always picked fights with russia, starting in early 1900s with Wilson.

Let's see who needs to stop posting forever.

Oh wait, I know what you are thinking!

Cuban Missile crisis? Oh wait.. that was just a response to U.S putting nukes in Georgia. (the country)

Oh wait, vietnam? Russians were suppling the weapons and the vietnamese attacked American ships?
NO WAIT. Gulf of Tonkin Incident was a fraud! US staged the event to go to war.
Even Wikipedia says so now.

What about that time when American troops invaded russia to battle bolshaviks, during the russian revolution?


Clearly, throughout history Russia has been very aggressive towards U.S - I concede my point, dear sir. You brainwashed propaganda is clearly superior to my knowledge.

Yes, yes. America is a horrible world power hell bent on world domination, and Russia is the benevolent hope for all of mankind. Gosh Darnit why can't we just leave those poor Russians alone!

You wanna know why Russia hasn't instigated many conflicts with the U.S.? Because they'd lose, like they did the last time. They came to us on their hands and knees begging for aide and we gave it, thats not something they are likely to forget.

When Russia leaves the countries around them alone, the big bad U.S. will most likely stop bullying them.

Lolled. Now, I'm no expert in these things, mind you, but these days, I don't think there are winners in wars, only losers. So yeah, it's kinda all the same who starts the war, it's all going to be a barren wasteland with a nice green glow after it's done.

Edit Oh, just to clarify, I wasn't arguing for Russia or anything. Hell, I'm Finnish. We've killed more than our fair share of them motherfuckers when they decided to cross over our borders carrying guns. :D

[Kael]

Cuban Missile crisis? Oh wait.. that was just a response to U.S putting nukes in Georgia. (the country)

Incorrect! Everyone knows that it was because the US stole the lead developer of the the USSRs new missle delivery system, Nikolai Stephanovich Sokolov.



lolz

[Rocl]

You only bolded the first one. And is it too close to rkenshin or something?

Did you shit bricks?

Don't worry I did, it was the first thing I noticed.

[Viena]

I was unaware that a light year was a speed instead of a period of time.

It's a distance!

It's both. Time and space are intrinsically related

Although they are related we measure them differently. You wouldn't know what I am talking about if say that I drive my car at a speed of 14 minutes, right? :wink:

[Senoska]

I was unaware that a light year was a speed instead of a period of time.

It's a distance!

It's both. Time and space are intrinsically related

Although they are related we measure them differently. You wouldn't know what I am talking about if say that I drive my car at a speed of 14 minutes, right? :wink:

Que stupid debate: since the speed of light is known if you gave the speed that you were traveling it would make sense. They are one in the same. It is a period of time as well as a distance traveled. It is a year of traveling at 299,792,458 m/s, or 5,878,625,373,183.61 miles total. One in the same

[Viena]

a) A year is a period of time.

b) A light year it's a speed, and although it's definition is based on a, it doesn't mean it's a, it's not.

Of course, that if you ignore the light part it's a time measure, but you would be talking about a. The same applies for non astronomical measuring: 1 m/s is not a period of time.

[Charla]

Lolled. Now, I'm no expert in these things, mind you, but these days, I don't think there are winners in wars, only losers.

Protip: when the other guy surrenders, you get to say you won. "there are no winners" is fine as a deep, overused philosophical statement, but it isn't exactly a description of reality.

[Anderian]

Lolled. Now, I'm no expert in these things, mind you, but these days, I don't think there are winners in wars, only losers.

Protip: when the other guy surrenders, you get to say you won. "there are no winners" is fine as a deep, overused philosophical statement, but it isn't exactly a description of reality.

/sigh

Edit: To avoid bitching and moaning, I am sighing because this is exactly the definition of arguing for the sake of arguing.

[Charla]

Lolled. Now, I'm no expert in these things, mind you, but these days, I don't think there are winners in wars, only losers.

Protip: when the other guy surrenders, you get to say you won. "there are no winners" is fine as a deep, overused philosophical statement, but it isn't exactly a description of reality.

/sigh

Edit: To avoid bitching and moaning, I am sighing because this is exactly the definition of arguing for the sake of arguing.

Hell yeah!
Oh, and don't forget arguing for the sake of postcount.

[Xavier]

Maybe now we can finally get back to the Cold War where things at least made sense in the world.

[guartz]

Lolled. Now, I'm no expert in these things, mind you, but these days, I don't think there are winners in wars, only losers. So yeah, it's kinda all the same who starts the war, it's all going to be a barren wasteland with a nice green glow after it's done.

Edit Oh, just to clarify, I wasn't arguing for Russia or anything. Hell, I'm Finnish. We've killed more than our fair share of them motherfuckers when they decided to cross over our borders carrying guns. :D

ha, that's right. Russians got it's ass kicked in Helsinki.

btw, are you people really that dense or are you all just fing with me?

[Charla]

Nobody ever went broke underestimating the intelligence of the American people. As far as I know, nobody ever went broke trying to estimate the collective intelligence of a forum, either.