Page 4 of 7 FirstFirst ... 2 3 4 5 6 ... LastLast
Results 61 to 80 of 130

Thread: Lieberman-Kyl amendment     submit to reddit submit to twitter

  1. #61
    Old Merits
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    1,060
    BG Level
    6

    Re: Lieberman-Kyl amendment

    Quote Originally Posted by Kuya
    Quote Originally Posted by Egon
    Quote Originally Posted by Kuya
    Quote Originally Posted by Egon
    Quote Originally Posted by Exoduso
    You're the one running from the truth lol.. We have no business starting wars just because we THINK someone might attack someone else in the future. We're not the world police we claim to be... and THAT'S why you have insurgents against Americans over there. It's hard to comprehend, I know, but people hate our fucking guts everywhere because we think everything is our business.
    This is where you're wrong. We ARE the world police. And ppl don't like us for the same reason why drunks don't like road blocks.
    I lol'd.
    If you're not smart enough to keep up, then gtfo.
    No, i understood perfectly. America is the roadblock other nations, who are drunk, because they clearly can't govern themselves, crash and burn into.

    That explains what happend Iraq also.
    Damn Straight!

  2. #62
    blax n gunz
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    11,141
    BG Level
    9

    Re: Lieberman-Kyl amendment

    Quote Originally Posted by Egon
    Damn Straight!
    http://i22.tinypic.com/11gumgj.jpg

    America! Fuck yeah!

    Now I know you're a troll.

  3. #63
    I'm not safe on my island
    Nikkei will still get me.

    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    20,043
    BG Level
    10

    Re: Lieberman-Kyl amendment

    But what does any of this have to do with the price of tea in china? Time to watch my soaps.

  4. #64
    Demosthenes11
    Guest

    Re: Lieberman-Kyl amendment

    Conservative Demosthenes11 Doesn't approve of this thread

  5. #65
    Sea Torques
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    691
    BG Level
    5

    Re: Lieberman-Kyl amendment

    Egon you watch fox news way to much

  6. #66
    Ridill
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    11,713
    BG Level
    9
    FFXIV Character
    Exoduso Fenice
    FFXIV Server
    Midgardsormr
    FFXI Server
    Bismarck

    Re: Lieberman-Kyl amendment

    Quote Originally Posted by Egon
    Quote Originally Posted by Exoduso
    You're the one running from the truth lol.. We have no business starting wars just because we THINK someone might attack someone else in the future. We're not the world police we claim to be... and THAT'S why you have insurgents against Americans over there. It's hard to comprehend, I know, but people hate our fucking guts everywhere because we think everything is our business.
    This is where you're wrong. We ARE the world police. And ppl don't like us for the same reason why drunks don't like road blocks.
    ... do you honestly believe that is the way things should be? That we should interfere anywhere we want, when we want, however we want, just because we're the almighty USA? Gimme a break..

  7. #67
    TIME OUT MOTHERFUCKER

    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    4,972
    BG Level
    7

    Re: Lieberman-Kyl amendment

    Egon has got to be a troll.


    I hope


    The whole thing is, if the president bombs Iran (or if Israel bombs Iran) Iran will retaliate on the troops in Iraq, as it has threatened to do so. The situation will dissolve quickly enough where a draft will be necessary. Or we withdraw all our troops from the middle east, damning israel to using nukes or dying.

    Corrections is saying I'm panicking, yet we have 2 aircraft carriers in the persian gulf, the media has been going apeshit painting Iran as the new Hitler germany, and now we have an amendment that gives to our president and our vice president, who couldn't give two shits about our own laws/constitution not to mention international laws, a justification to attack Iran.

    Maybe I'm tad paranoid.

  8. #68
    The God Damn Kuno
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    13,360
    BG Level
    9
    FFXIV Character
    Kuno Sedai
    FFXIV Server
    Gilgamesh
    FFXI Server
    Bahamut

    Re: Lieberman-Kyl amendment

    People like Egon are the reason we're in this fucking mess to begin with.

    It's not possible to have a conventional war anymore. You can't just roll in the tanks and take over a country these days. Also the US is in no condition to be keeping this shit up.

    Protip: In 20 years the US will be a big fucking shithole cause of this mess.

  9. #69
    Relic Horn
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    3,215
    BG Level
    7

    Re: Lieberman-Kyl amendment

    Holy crap, this thread turned awesome! Thanks mister 21 posts!

    Counter-arguments:

    Quote Originally Posted by http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saddam_hussein
    A leading member of the revolutionary Ba'ath Party, which espoused secular pan-Arabism, economic modernization, and socialism...
    Protip: secular = non-religious. That means he didn't agree with the religous fundamentalists, which is a fancy word for the terrorists.

    Quote Originally Posted by http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hezbollah
    Most in the Arab and Muslim worlds regard Hezbollah as a legitimate resistance movement
    Protip: a resistance movement usually opposes the established government.

    And finally:
    Quote Originally Posted by http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_nations
    The stated aims of the United Nations are to prevent war, to safeguard human rights, to provide a mechanism for international law, and to promote social and economic progress, improve living standards and fight diseases. It gives the opportunity for countries to balance global interdependence and national interests when addressing international problems. Toward these ends it ratified a Universal Declaration of Human Rights in 1948.
    Protip: That's pretty much what a world police does.

    Now then, feel free to either respond with something resembling an argument or continue trolling. Politics on this board hasn't been much fun since JerseyProphet stopped getting drunk

  10. #70
    blax n gunz
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    11,141
    BG Level
    9

    Re: Lieberman-Kyl amendment

    Quote Originally Posted by guartz
    Corrections is saying I'm panicking, yet we have 2 aircraft carriers in the persian gulf
    How about that, we have our aircraft carriers near a warzone! Obviously by rule of proximity it means we're going to attack anybody we don't like in the region.

    Quote Originally Posted by guartz
    , the media has been going apeshit painting Iran as the new Hitler germany
    Funny how the news sources I actually pay attention to (i.e. not Bill O'Reilly) don't do this, ever. But I guess sweeping generalizations is the only language an alarmist understands.

    Quote Originally Posted by guartz
    and now we have an amendment that gives to our president and our vice president, who couldn't give two shits about our own laws/constitution not to mention international laws, a justification to attack Iran.
    Get this through your maddeningly thick skull: This particular amendment is NOT FUCKING LAW. We are not bound by it to declare war on Iran, let alone agree with its conclusions.

  11. #71
    I'm not safe on my island
    Nikkei will still get me.

    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    20,043
    BG Level
    10

    Re: Lieberman-Kyl amendment

    Quote Originally Posted by guartz
    Egon has got to be a troll.


    I hope


    The whole thing is, if the president bombs Iran (or if Israel bombs Iran) Iran will retaliate on the troops in Iraq, as it has threatened to do so. The situation will dissolve quickly enough where a draft will be necessary. Or we withdraw all our troops from the middle east, damning israel to using nukes or dying.

    Corrections is saying I'm panicking, yet we have 2 aircraft carriers in the persian gulf, the media has been going apeshit painting Iran as the new Hitler germany, and now we have an amendment that gives to our president and our vice president, who couldn't give two shits about our own laws/constitution not to mention international laws, a justification to attack Iran.

    Maybe I'm tad paranoid.
    I do admit, even though you usually make exagerated points and jump to extreme conclusions. And you totaly screwed up the OP in this thread, i'm feeling a bit uneasy about this to. The Iran president coming to the U.S. and the media having a frenzy with him, as usual, is smelling of propaganda.

  12. #72
    Relic Horn
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    3,215
    BG Level
    7

    Re: Lieberman-Kyl amendment

    The thing is, I get the impression he's using it as propaganda as much as we are.

    @Kuno: It's only impossible for America to have a conventional war. Little guys in Africa and whatnot still roll out the tanks once in a while, and the rest of the world barely notices.

  13. #73
    TIME OUT MOTHERFUCKER

    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    4,972
    BG Level
    7

    Re: Lieberman-Kyl amendment

    Quote Originally Posted by Correction
    Quote Originally Posted by guartz
    Corrections is saying I'm panicking, yet we have 2 aircraft carriers in the persian gulf
    How about that, we have our aircraft carriers near a warzone! Obviously by rule of proximity it means we're going to attack anybody we don't like in the region.

    Quote Originally Posted by guartz
    , the media has been going apeshit painting Iran as the new Hitler germany
    Funny how the news sources I actually pay attention to (i.e. not Bill O'Reilly) don't do this, ever. But I guess sweeping generalizations is the only language an alarmist understands.

    Quote Originally Posted by guartz
    and now we have an amendment that gives to our president and our vice president, who couldn't give two shits about our own laws/constitution not to mention international laws, a justification to attack Iran.
    Get this through your maddeningly thick skull: This particular amendment is NOT FUCKING LAW. We are not bound by it to declare war on Iran, let alone agree with its conclusions.

    1.) The carriers are just off Iran's western coast.
    2.) You must have not watched the news in the past 3 days, with the visit and all?
    3.) Iraq war didn't start with a law either. Only justification and a tacit consent of congress.

    Correction, if we have differences of opinions doesn't make me an idiot, no matter how passionately you may disagree with me. Being so crude about it only makes you look ugly. Like it or not, my points, though sometimes stretched, have merit, in almost all occasions.

  14. #74
    TIME OUT MOTHERFUCKER

    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    4,972
    BG Level
    7

    Re: Lieberman-Kyl amendment

    Quote Originally Posted by Charla
    The thing is, I get the impression he's using it as propaganda as much as we are.

    @Kuno: It's only impossible for America to have a conventional war. Little guys in Africa and whatnot still roll out the tanks once in a while, and the rest of the world barely notices.

    yes you damn right he is, the whole visit was a play. Why?

    Iran is a large country, it has an economy, it has it's own stock market. Ahmadinejad's purpose is to act strong, to give an impression that Iran is so strong that US wouldn't dare attack it. This is so the rich people in Iran continue to invest in the country, and not run away, taking their money with them. Explains Ahmadinejad cocky attitude, which US is adeptly exploiting.

  15. #75
    Bring on the Revolution
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    21,061
    BG Level
    10

    Re: Lieberman-Kyl amendment

    lulz

    sound Familiar?

    Egon has got to stop trying to repeat everything hes told by hannity /Lavin/Rush. think for yourself instead of what they tell you to think.

  16. #76
    blax n gunz
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    11,141
    BG Level
    9

    Re: Lieberman-Kyl amendment

    Quote Originally Posted by guartz
    1.) The carriers are just off Iran's western coast.
    2.) You must have not watched the news in the past 3 days, with the visit and all?
    3.) Iraq war didn't start with a law either. Only justification and a tacit consent of congress.

    Correction, if we have differences of opinions doesn't make me an idiot, no matter how passionately you may disagree with me. Being so crude about it only makes you look ugly. Like it or not, my points, though sometimes stretched, have merit, in almost all occasions.
    1) The persian gulf borders more countries than Iran. And I didn't know the navy briefed you on the exact position of aircraft carriers
    2) Yeah the news I watched said 'Iran president in town.' and '"No gays in our country like yours" said the Iranian President.' Not "NEW HITLER IN TOWN AND HE'S A SHORT IRANIAN DUDE." An intelligent man can tell the difference between a quote from someone who doesn't like Ahmadinejad and a vast media conspiracy to paint a little toothbrush mustache on him and a swastica on his arm.
    3) Also started after a joint resolution of Congress. Not simply 'tacit consent.' The fucking paid for it.

    My problem with you guartz is you take something that's FACTUALLY WRONG (your OP) and just go on and on and on and on, without giving the slightest hint that you've learned you were wrong in the first place and maybe should not build upon a thread in which you were fundamentally wrong.

  17. #77
    TIME OUT MOTHERFUCKER

    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    4,972
    BG Level
    7

    Re: Lieberman-Kyl amendment

    Quote Originally Posted by Correction

    1) The persian gulf borders more countries than Iran. And I didn't know the navy briefed you on the exact position of aircraft carriers
    2) Yeah the news I watched said 'Iran president in town.' and '"No gays in our country like yours" said the Iranian President.' Not "NEW HITLER IN TOWN AND HE'S A SHORT IRANIAN DUDE." An intelligent man can tell the difference between a quote from someone who doesn't like Ahmadinejad and a vast media conspiracy to paint a little toothbrush mustache on him and a swastica on his arm.
    3) Also started after a joint resolution of Congress. Not simply 'tacit consent.' The fucking paid for it.

    My problem with you guartz is you take something that's FACTUALLY WRONG (your OP) and just go on and on and on and on, without giving the slightest hint that you've learned you were wrong in the first place and maybe should not build upon a thread in which you were fundamentally wrong.
    1. The white house press briefed the entire world regarding that, not just me.
    2. True, most of the bashing came from talking head experts, and entire fox news but it still constitutes a propaganda campaign because the entire mainstream media participated, if not directly then indirectly.
    3. Man, that resolution can be interpreted in two ways.
    1. Gives authority to invade Iraq
    2. Gives president authority to defend America using military from iraq AND enforce all relevant United Nations Security Council Resolutions regarding Iraq.

    Exact wording:
    "defend the national security of the United States against the continuing threat posed by Iraq; and enforce all relevant United Nations Security Council Resolutions regarding Iraq."

    Aside from the misleading title, I see nowhere saying zomg tankrush iraq kekekeke

    The president and you, choose number interpretation 1.

  18. #78
    Ridill
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    11,713
    BG Level
    9
    FFXIV Character
    Exoduso Fenice
    FFXIV Server
    Midgardsormr
    FFXI Server
    Bismarck

    Re: Lieberman-Kyl amendment

    Quote Originally Posted by Rhinox
    lulz

    sound Familiar?

    Egon has got to stop trying to repeat everything hes told by hannity /Lavin/Rush. think for yourself instead of what they tell you to think.
    lolwin.

  19. #79
    Tyr
    Tyr is offline
    E. Body
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    2,270
    BG Level
    7

    Re: Lieberman-Kyl amendment

    Read as much of the post as my brain could handle, and not so much because of intelligible dialogue (although there were some interesting points made on either side). Forum debates like these never get anywhere, and random idiots (read: Egon) enter the post and just ruin a potentially good topic. It also doesn't help if (at least in the first two pages, it was mainly Guartz v. Charla) people just shoot out "ok, then you're an idiot." or my favorite "go claim your darters" because whether or not a valid point is offered, the debate becomes nothing more than ad hominem posts. I wish we could find an unbiased moderator, skilled in debates, to at least look over these posts -- not to determine one side being right or wrong, but to allow for at least refreshing debate instead of just blurting out the first thing that comes to mind and adding on "you stupid ass" at the end of every comment. And to put it out there, apologies if this post sounds pretentious, as it's not my intent.

  20. #80
    Relic Shield
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    1,668
    BG Level
    6

    Re: Lieberman-Kyl amendment

    Quote Originally Posted by guartz
    Egon has got to be a troll.


    I hope


    The whole thing is, if the president bombs Iran (or if Israel bombs Iran) Iran will retaliate on the troops in Iraq, as it has threatened to do so. The situation will dissolve quickly enough where a draft will be necessary. Or we withdraw all our troops from the middle east, damning israel to using nukes or dying.

    Corrections is saying I'm panicking, yet we have 2 aircraft carriers in the persian gulf, the media has been going apeshit painting Iran as the new Hitler germany, and now we have an amendment that gives to our president and our vice president, who couldn't give two shits about our own laws/constitution not to mention international laws, a justification to attack Iran.

    Maybe I'm tad paranoid.
    One thing anybody should know about Israel is to not fuck with it. For its size it is one of the most powerful military nation(propartionally).

    Also to Egon, America is not the worlds police force, the UN is. Honestly Saddam was terrible dictator, but by far not the worst. Look up North Korea sometime and learn of the millions of people who starve while Kim JOng Il lives the life of luxury- and he actually HAS the bomb. Not to mention in recent years they have developed long range missiles that could reach the Japan or US coast. If there is any dictator that should have been overthrown it should have been him.

    Edit: im not of Korean or any asian decent, my background is Scotish and Irish.

Page 4 of 7 FirstFirst ... 2 3 4 5 6 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. That's in the first amendment?
    By kuronosan in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 185
    Last Post: 2010-10-23, 17:42
  2. Replies: 46
    Last Post: 2010-05-08, 21:03
  3. Replies: 30
    Last Post: 2010-04-29, 16:47
  4. Replies: 98
    Last Post: 2009-07-27, 14:08
  5. Wuts a 1st amendment?
    By Kuya in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 150
    Last Post: 2007-04-23, 13:31
  6. Discuss the second amendment here.
    By Devek in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 344
    Last Post: 2007-04-18, 12:03