
Originally Posted by
ringthree
the increased chance to hit from Optical Hat is more than the ultra-small benefit of 5 STR or 5 Attack and lower Accuracy, if you are using meat.
I rarely find myself satisfied with meat these days, even with my loved Hedgehog Pie.
But honestly talking about these 4 gears for monk:
1) Shura Zunari-Kabuto (+5STR +5ACC -50ish HP)
2) Pahluwan Qalansuwa (+7ACC +5ATT, +something HP)
3) Optical Hat (+10ACC +10EVA)
4) Walahra Turban (+5% Haste, +30 HP)
Ok it's pretty evident how 4) is the best, but we're talking about situations when we want accuracy.
My idea is that in most situations the difference will be so little that it's probably not even worth to argue, but let me go in further details thinking about possible scenarios/situations:
* Our accuracy is decent, but not as much as we would like it to be *
In this scenario is debeatable if Shura would make a difference. We could argue about having like a 0.something % more accuracy, or 5% faster hits so more chances to land a hit. If accuracy is decent, in the end, I'd probably still stick to Walahra.
* Our accuracy needs a boost *
Walahra is out, Shura probably isn't enough.
The doubt remains between Pahluwan and Optical.
Is +3 acc on optical worth a compensation for +5 att?
They both seem like very minimal damage.
+3 acc is not going to make a noticeable difference in the end over our total damage over a certain amount of time ratio, but the same can probably be said for +5 att.
Honestly, even in this situation I would still use Qalansuwa.
I hink nowadays I would use Optical Hat only when I'm for some reason tanking in +eva gear, and I think it's more important to get that +10 eva rather than that +5% haste from Walahra for Utsusemi recast.