http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21115130/wi ... ?GT1=10514
At first i thought the guy was just an attention whore for just going to an interview, because i thought that vasectomies, and the choice to not have children wasn't something so out of place now a days. But i was surprised me when i read the comments here: http://allday.msnbc.msn.com/archive/200 ... 93201.aspx
I could not understand the comments such as "He's just being selfish by not giving back to society". Excuse me? Did i just see someone say that? How is he not giving back to society by not having children? Lets not forget that it's no longer the Midevil ages and having children is no longer an economic asset in 1st to 2nd world countries. It cost quite a bit for parents to raise children and properly support them. It's not something you should just do and expect everything to be ok, it needs a great deal of planning and emotional readiness.
I don't see why someone is selfish for not wanting to bring a child to an already overcrowded world, in fact, he's doing society a favor by not having chilren, barring the age disparity that is leaving many 1st/2nd world countries with the possibility of a small young work force that is not enough to cover for the older generation. We certainly don't need more mouths to feed, especially to parents who aren't fit for the role. I would assume the man would get praised for doing what most don't and should. Realizing he's not ready for parenthood. Though i don't agree with the extremity of the choice he's taken, it is a nice way to avoid "accidents" in the future i supose. His mind could change in the future, as it undoubtively will.
But where does a person or rather society, get off laying claim on someone's sexual organs? How is his choice with his testicles, their business? Note, that this can also apply to the abortion issue, and people's reproductory(sp?) organs suddenly being made into public business. At first i scoffed at the inteview, till i noticed society is actually still filled with people who still feel "keeping the family line alive" should exceed the well being of the possible child or even their own lives. People still seem to think that leaving offspring, in today's world is still their "duty". Why in the world do people continue to keep to this idea that you have to have children because everybody else is doing it?
And something else that shocked me while reading the comments in the blog was the fact that women actually don't have the same rights as men when it comes to planing for a childfree future. Apperently it's a woman's obligation for them to have children or something. And i lol'd at the "psychiatrist" saying he must be spiritually bankrupt.
XI Wiki

