But if the ball is underthrown and it lands at the DB's feet, it's PI because you're blocking the reciever from catching the ball when you don't have any idea where it is.Originally Posted by Tyche
But if the ball is underthrown and it lands at the DB's feet, it's PI because you're blocking the reciever from catching the ball when you don't have any idea where it is.Originally Posted by Tyche
PI has to be a catchable ball in that case you moron.Originally Posted by Deejay
Pretty sure a ball underthrown that bad would be called uncatchable, and when it's uncatchable, any action that would have constituted PI is no long applicable.
edit: beaten![]()
Jesus christ, you're a fucking idiot if you think a ball thrown at your feet is uncatchable. If the DB is in front of the receiver on an under thrown ball he's blocking the path to the ball without knowing where it is. This is why you're taught to read the receiver's eyes so you're not flagged on an underthrown ball.Originally Posted by Keno
I don't know how much clearer I can make this.
Where have we said once that the DB is in front of the WR? If the DB is in front of the WR, it'd be nigh impossible to block the WRs view outside of playing peek-a-boo.
Edit: Has there always been 4 hashmarks in college football?
Where else would the DB be if it's an out or fade pattern?Originally Posted by Tyche
Arch is starting to see what i'm talking about.Originally Posted by archibaldcrane
You also see this happen on fly patterns where it's the DB vs. WR. What you're NOT supposed to do is put your hands up while the WR is still locating the ball because it could be underthrown and when the WR stops to turn around the ref will see that you're:
A.) Not playing the ball because your hands are up when it's still not even in your proximity.
B.) You're blocking the receiver from coming back and making the catch.
You will get flagged for this, (not always) but it does happen.
Have any of you guys played DB or WR before?
is it really that big of a deal? take the play away, take away all the penalties, the outcome would be the same, dallas beating green bay
Well, unless the WR turns a complete 180 and finishes the route running backwards (which I have seen!), he's behind him. Fade routes are usually caught over the shoulder.
Who is he and who is him? lolOriginally Posted by Tyche
Fade routes are usually caught over the shoulder, correct. But if the ball is underthrown than it is illegal for the DB to just put his hands up and stand there. It's PI. That's the only point I was trying to make.
edit: And keno, if you want to sling disses without any real rhyme or reason go to spam.
Put your ecocks away, christ.
They called it on Ellis Hobbs in the AFC Championship game last season.Originally Posted by archibaldcrane
He'll only get flagged if he's faceguarding (specifically covering the receiver's face with his hands) or he collides with the receiver. Putting yourself between the receiver and the ball in any other manner without physically impeding the receiver, even if you have no idea where the ball is, is perfectly fine. Ball thrown at his feet, defender doesn't know where it is - fine. Unless he runs into the receiver who is making a play on the ball.Originally Posted by Deejay
*bangs his head on his desk*
Blocking a receiver's path to the ball is pass interference. When you don't turn around and keep your hands up you're blocking the receiver from making a path to the ball if it's underthrown.Originally Posted by archibaldcrane
Ouch Joe Gibbs...Ouch...
w00t! GO BILLS!Originally Posted by Daahan
Rex Grossman is looking.... awesome? so far!![]()
It seems more offenses are following this play-every-down-like-you're-losing-with-2-minutes-left trend.
God I love undrafted free agents! Selvin Mothafuckin Young!
Oh, and Oakland you still suck.