
Originally Posted by
Ferien
Zam tests were
here
Tested three size3 shields assuming a common base reduction percentage and found out the DEF/2 = 1% thing. From there, he was able to extrapolate the base and find the base for other sizes. Results were:
1: 22%
2: 40%
3: 50%
4: ??
Aegis was tested by myself to give 76% damage reduction (
here), so this leads to either there being a 56% base for it, or it just having a defined 76%, not that it matters.
Also, my numbers for Koenig Shield nearly mirror zam's, so there's a point for them. Only problem with going out and testing this now will be that the damage functions are still unknown, so prior assumptions may be invalid now. I used the two most frequent values to determine proc rate and reduction, which I was able to confirm as valid with my Aegis tests, but depending on how random it is now, it may be impossible to find. We'll see how it goes.
What cracks me up with this data is how close the Aegis damage reduction over time is to Keonig.
Aegis = 76% damage reduction on block.
Koenig = 50%(size3) + 11%(def of 22/2) = 61%.
So on shield block your taking 15% less damage with Aegis.
So for Melee DoT reduction with max block rate:
Koenig: .65 * .61 = 39.65% Physical DoT reduction.
Aegis: .65 * .76 = 49.4% Physical DoT reduction.
~10% difference in DoT.
So basically Aegis is a 200-300 mil gil defending ring.
And yes I know I am not factoring in the -25% magic damage that helps on Magic WSs, AoE, and just about everything in the game, as that does place Aegis >>>> Koenig. Its just a common misconception that Aegis -significantly- reduces the physical DoT you take, as the gap isnt really that big.
Just like any other relic weapon, Aegis is the best option for its class, but by no means game breaking. As always, knowledge of job and how you use it > all. Though I have been in quite a few solo/low man situations since I got Aegis where afterwards I was like "jesus, Aegis was the reason I am still alive", so no regrets here.